Anders Carlsson1, Viswam S Nair, Madelyn S Luttgen, Khun Visith Keu, George Horng, Minal Vasanawala, Anand Kolatkar, Mehran Jamali, Andrei H Iagaru, Ware Kuschner, Billy W Loo, Joseph B Shrager, Kelly Bethel, Carl K Hoh, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Jorge Nieva, Peter Kuhn, Sanjiv S Gambhir. 1. *The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Cell Biology, La Jolla, CA; †Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA; ‡Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Sherbrooke, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Sherbrooke, Québec; §The California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA; ‖The VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; ¶Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; #The VA Palo Alto Health Care System Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Palo Alto, CA; **Department of Radiation Oncology; ††Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; ‡‡The VA Palo Alto Health Care System Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Palo Alto, CA; §§Scripps Clinic, Department of Pathology, La Jolla, CA; ‖‖Nuclear Medicine Division, University of San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA; ¶¶The Moores Cancer Center, University of San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, CA; ##The Billings Clinic, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Billings, MT; ***Departments of Bioengineering and †††Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) are potentially important cancer biomarkers, but using them for cancer detection in early-stage disease has been assay limited. We examined CTM test performance using a sensitive detection platform to identify stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing imaging evaluation. METHODS: First, we prospectively enrolled patients during 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging evaluation for lung cancer that underwent routine phlebotomy where CTM and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were identified in blood using nuclear (DAPI), cytokeratin (CK), and CD45 immune-fluorescent antibodies followed by morphologic identification. Second, CTM and CTC data were integrated with patient (age, gender, smoking, and cancer history) and imaging (tumor diameter, location in lung, and maximum standard uptake value [SUVmax]) data to develop and test multiple logistic regression models using a case-control design in a training and test cohort followed by cross-validation in the entire group. RESULTS: We examined 104 patients with NSCLC, and the subgroup of 80 with stage I disease, and compared them to 25 patients with benign disease. Clinical and imaging data alone were moderately discriminating for all comers (Area under the Curve [AUC] = 0.77) and by stage I disease only (AUC = 0.77). However, the presence of CTM combined with clinical and imaging data was significantly discriminating for diagnostic accuracy in all NSCLC patients (AUC = 0.88, p value = 0.001) and for stage I patients alone (AUC = 0.87, p value = 0.002). CONCLUSION: CTM may add utility for lung cancer diagnosis during imaging evaluation using a sensitive detection platform.
INTRODUCTION:Circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) are potentially important cancer biomarkers, but using them for cancer detection in early-stage disease has been assay limited. We examined CTM test performance using a sensitive detection platform to identify stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing imaging evaluation. METHODS: First, we prospectively enrolled patients during 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging evaluation for lung cancer that underwent routine phlebotomy where CTM and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were identified in blood using nuclear (DAPI), cytokeratin (CK), and CD45 immune-fluorescent antibodies followed by morphologic identification. Second, CTM and CTC data were integrated with patient (age, gender, smoking, and cancer history) and imaging (tumor diameter, location in lung, and maximum standard uptake value [SUVmax]) data to develop and test multiple logistic regression models using a case-control design in a training and test cohort followed by cross-validation in the entire group. RESULTS: We examined 104 patients with NSCLC, and the subgroup of 80 with stage I disease, and compared them to 25 patients with benign disease. Clinical and imaging data alone were moderately discriminating for all comers (Area under the Curve [AUC] = 0.77) and by stage I disease only (AUC = 0.77). However, the presence of CTM combined with clinical and imaging data was significantly discriminating for diagnostic accuracy in all NSCLCpatients (AUC = 0.88, p value = 0.001) and for stage I patients alone (AUC = 0.87, p value = 0.002). CONCLUSION:CTM may add utility for lung cancer diagnosis during imaging evaluation using a sensitive detection platform.
Authors: Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lalitha K Shankar; John M Hoffman; Steve Bacharach; Michael M Graham; Joel Karp; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Steven Larson; David A Mankoff; Barry A Siegel; Annick Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey Yap; Daniel Sullivan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; Daniel F Hayes; G Thomas Budd; Mathew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; Jeri Matera; W Jeffrey Allard; M Craig Miller; Herbert A Fritsche; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Leon W M M Terstappen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W Jeffrey Allard; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; Madeline Repollet; Mark C Connelly; Chandra Rao; Arjan G J Tibbe; Jonathan W Uhr; Leon W M M Terstappen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: B Brandt; R Junker; C Griwatz; S Heidl; O Brinkmann; A Semjonow; G Assmann; K S Zänker Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1996-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sunitha Nagrath; Lecia V Sequist; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daphne W Bell; Daniel Irimia; Lindsey Ulkus; Matthew R Smith; Eunice L Kwak; Subba Digumarthy; Alona Muzikansky; Paula Ryan; Ulysses J Balis; Ronald G Tompkins; Daniel A Haber; Mehmet Toner Journal: Nature Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Michael K Gould; Jessica Donington; William R Lynch; Peter J Mazzone; David E Midthun; David P Naidich; Renda Soylemez Wiener Journal: Chest Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Ramón Rami-Porta; David Ball; John Crowley; Dorothy J Giroux; James Jett; William D Travis; Masahiro Tsuboi; Eric Vallières; Peter Goldstraw Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Vasudha Murlidhar; Rishindra M Reddy; Shamileh Fouladdel; Lili Zhao; Martin K Ishikawa; Svetlana Grabauskiene; Zhuo Zhang; Jules Lin; Andrew C Chang; Philip Carrott; William R Lynch; Mark B Orringer; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Nallasivam Palanisamy; David G Beer; Max S Wicha; Nithya Ramnath; Ebrahim Azizi; Sunitha Nagrath Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Elizabeth M Jaffee; Chi Van Dang; David B Agus; Brian M Alexander; Kenneth C Anderson; Alan Ashworth; Anna D Barker; Roshan Bastani; Sangeeta Bhatia; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Otis Brawley; Atul J Butte; Daniel G Coit; Nancy E Davidson; Mark Davis; Ronald A DePinho; Robert B Diasio; Giulio Draetta; A Lindsay Frazier; Andrew Futreal; Sam S Gambhir; Patricia A Ganz; Levi Garraway; Stanton Gerson; Sumit Gupta; James Heath; Ruth I Hoffman; Cliff Hudis; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Ramy Ibrahim; Hossein Jadvar; Brian Kavanagh; Rick Kittles; Quynh-Thu Le; Scott M Lippman; David Mankoff; Elaine R Mardis; Deborah K Mayer; Kelly McMasters; Neal J Meropol; Beverly Mitchell; Peter Naredi; Dean Ornish; Timothy M Pawlik; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Martin G Pomper; Derek Raghavan; Christine Ritchie; Sally W Schwarz; Richard Sullivan; Richard Wahl; Jedd D Wolchok; Sandra L Wong; Alfred Yung Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Sam H Au; Brian D Storey; John C Moore; Qin Tang; Yeng-Long Chen; Sarah Javaid; A Fatih Sarioglu; Ryan Sullivan; Marissa W Madden; Ryan O'Keefe; Daniel A Haber; Shyamala Maheswaran; David M Langenau; Shannon L Stott; Mehmet Toner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 11.205