| Literature DB >> 25157693 |
Abstract
I agree with Nachev and Hacker's general approach. However, their criticism of claims of covert automaticity can be strengthened. I first say a few words on what voluntary action involves and on the consequent limited relevance of brain research for the determination of voluntariness. I then turn to Nachev and Hacker's discussion of possible covert automaticity and show why the case for it is weaker than they allow.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25157693 DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2014.951618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Neurosci ISSN: 1758-8928 Impact factor: 3.065