Literature DB >> 25157337

An evidence-based review of NX1207 and its potential in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Thomas Kunit1, Lukas Lusuardi1.   

Abstract

In elderly men, benign prostatic hyperplasia is often associated with lower urinary tract symptoms, and its prevalence rises with age. Lower urinary tract symptoms can be very bothersome and lead to a decrease in health-related quality of life. Furthermore, benign prostatic hyperplasia is a progressive disease that can lead to serious complications like acute urinary retention. Medical treatment with α1-blockers or 5α-reductase inhibitors is recommended by the European Association of Urology. On the other hand, there are some new innovations such as NX1207. The aim of this review is to summarize the published data. NX1207 is a new drug that is administered by transrectal intraprostatic injection under ultrasound guidance. The substance leads to prostate volume reduction and symptomatic improvement. However, patient numbers are still low and currently treatment with NX1207 is still experimental.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPH; LUTS; NX 1207; hyperplasia; prostate

Year:  2014        PMID: 25157337      PMCID: PMC4103918          DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S46047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Rep Urol        ISSN: 2253-2447


Introduction

In elderly and middle-aged men, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition; it is also called benign enlargement of the prostate. It is known that with age the prevalence of BPH increases. BPH is caused by hyperplasia of glandular and stromal tissues of the prostate.1,2 BPH leads to an enlarged gland, which is defined as >30 cm3.3 Among the most common diagnoses of middle-aged men (around 50 years or older), BPH is the fourth most common.4 These patients are afflicted by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The typical symptoms of LUTS are nocturia, frequent urination, urgency, weak stream, and incomplete emptying of the bladder. In cases of incomplete emptying, urinary infections are also typical in these patients. The severity of LUTS is assessed by the validated International Prostatic Symptom Score.5 Symptom severity is classified into three different groups: mild (0–7), moderate (8–19), or severe (20–35). As a basic principle, LUTS is caused by bladder outlet resistance due to prostate enlargement. However, the relationship between prostate enlargement and LUTS is not clear at all. An enlarged prostate does not lead to LUTS in every patient. Conversely, not every patient suffering LUTS has BPH. It is well known that nearly every man older than 80 years has histological BPH, but not all of them suffer LUTS. In contrast, LUTS has a prevalence of only 46% in men older than 70 years.6 It is well known that untreated BPH is a progressive condition and LUTS could worsen over time. Age over 50 years, prostate specific antigen >1.4 ng/mL, prostatic volume >30 cm3, and an International Prostatic Symptom Score of more than eight are predictive for progression.7 Without treatment, BPH can cause significant complications. Acute urinary retention, bladder calculi, and urinary tract infection are typically found in these patients. The most dangerous complication of untreated BPH with LUTS is renal impairment.8 Before starting treatment in these patients, the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends a diagnostic workup. This includes medical history, the already mentioned International Prostatic Symptom Score, physical examination, urinalysis, and blood tests. Furthermore, an ultrasound examination of the prostate, bladder, and kidneys should be done. As an extended diagnostic workup, uroflowmetry and a bladder diary can be done.9

Treatment

Current treatment guidelines, such as the EAU guidelines, offer different treatment options. A trial of watchful waiting is recommended for men with mild-to-moderate LUTS. A requirement for this is that LUTS causes no serious health threat in these patients and they are not too bothered by their symptoms. Lifestyle advice such as reduction of fluid intake in the evening or reduction of caffeine and alcohol should be given. Also, double voiding and urethral stripping is useful for these patients. When medical treatment is needed, α1-blockers are the standard medication for this group. However, their effect is not measurable through urodynamic measurement. In contrast, 5α-reductase inhibitors can improve flow rates by gland shrinkage. As written in the EAU guidelines, 5α-reductase inhibitors should be given to men with moderate-to-severe LUTS in combination with an enlarged prostate (>40 mL) or elevated prostate specific antigen concentrations (>1.4–1.6 μg/L). Furthermore, 5α-reductase inhibitors reduce the risk of acute urinary retention and can prevent surgery. Another treatment option mentioned in the EAU guidelines is phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. In the past, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors have been licensed only for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Recently, tadalafil – a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor with a long half-life – has been given to patients suffering mild LUTS with or without erectile dysfunction.9

NX1207

NX1207 is a new drug for the treatment of BPH, but it is still under investigation. It is a new protein that has been shown preclinically to induce apoptosis in cells.10 Apoptosis is well known as a program of cell death, which is used to kill unwanted cells. During apoptosis, morphological changes of the cell, disintegration of plasma membrane, cell shrinkage, and development of apoptotic bodies are found.11 Cysteine proteases called caspases are crucial for the apoptotic program. These activated proteases can be used as apoptotic markers measured by flow cytometry or fluorescence microscopy. In the early phase of apoptosis, the cell membrane loses its stability. During this process, membrane proteins of the inner leaflet switch to the external surface of the cell.12 Annexin V has a high affinity to these proteins and can therefore be used as an apoptotic marker. Caspase activation and Annexin V were verified in cells treated with NX1207 in vivo and in vitro; therefore, the investigators concluded that NX1207 leads to apoptotic cell death. The exact mechanism of action is not described in the published papers. The drug is dispensed in phosphate-buffered saline at physiological pH 7.4. In contrast to all licensed medications for LUTS, NX1207 is not given orally. Before the injection, patients are treated with antibiotics for 3 days and the antibiotic prophylaxis is continued for 7 days. A total of 5 mL NX1207 is injected directly into the periurethral zone of the prostate, using transrectal ultrasound for guidance. There is not any need for anesthesia. In the published papers, only slight dysuria for 2 days or minimal hematuria was described. A Phase III clinical trial using NX1207 is currently ongoing. Inclusion criteria are a prostatic volume between 30–70 mL and moderate-to-severe LUTS. A total of 5 mL NX1207 is injected into both transitional zones of the gland without any anesthesia. Furthermore, no catheterization is needed.12 There are two Phase II studies available in the USA. Trial 0014 was the first one. It was designed as a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. There were 43 clinical trial sites in the USA. A total of 175 men with clinical BPH were included in the study. Three different doses of NX1207 were examined – 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg. As a placebo control, saline was used. After randomization, a dose of NX1207 or saline was injected into the gland. The primary endpoint of this study was defined as an improvement in American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI) score – measured after 90 days. An improved AUASI score was found in every treatment arm. The lowest concentration of NX1207 (2.5 mg) led to a mean decrease in AUASI score to 11.0 (P=0.008 compared to placebo). With 5 mg NX1207, an improvement to 8.7 (P=0.08 compared to placebo) was found. The highest concentration of NX1207 (10 mg) led to a decrease in AUASI score to 8.1 (P=0.17 compared to placebo). Taking all treatment arms together, the mean improvement was 9.35 (P=0.017 compared to placebo). The secondary endpoint was defined as the volume reduction of the transition zone of the gland. A statistically significant mean prostate volume decrease of 6.8 mL was found compared to placebo. Trial 0016 was the second Phase II study. Like the first study, it was a multicenter and randomized trial. However, this study was designed as a noninferiority study. Thirty-two centers in the USA participated in Trial 0016. NX1207 (2.5 mg) was injected into the prostate and compared with finasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor. To prove dose-dependent efficacy, 0.125 mg NX1207 was also tested. Eighty-five patients were included in this trial. They were randomized to receive 2.5 mg NX1207, 0.125 mg NX1207, or finasteride. The study was double blinded in term of dosage. As in the first study, the primary endpoint was defined as change in AUASI score. The score was measured 90 and 180 days after treatment. As expected, 2.5 mg NX1207 led to a better AUASI score compared with 0.125 mg after 90 days. In detail, the mean decrease was 9.71 treated with 2.5 mg (N=48) and 4.29 for 0.125 mg (N=7) (P=0.034). Compared to finasteride, NX1207 was noninferior. The mean AUASI improvement was 4.13 for finasteride (N=24, P=0.001 compared to 2.5 mg NX1207). As in the first study, the volume reduction of the gland was investigated. A reduction of 4.6 g was seen with the 2.5 mg NX1207 dosage. After 180 days, the AUASI score was repeated. Full dosage of NX1207 resulted in a mean decrease of 7.51 and was noninferior compared to finasteride. The investigators tried a subgroup analysis, but they did not find a statistical difference in the results between moderate or severe LUTS. In this study, serum protein specific antigen levels and serum testosterone were also measured. However, NX1207 had no influence on these two parameters. Furthermore, no case of impaired sexual function from the injection of NX1207 was described.12 Taking all published data together, and although the patient numbers are very low, the level of evidence of publications is Ib.

Conclusion

All published clinical trials of NX1207 have demonstrated a significant improvement in symptomatic BPH. There was a statistically significant improvement in AUASI scores in patients treated with NX1207 compared to placebo (Table 1). A significant shrinkage in prostatic volume was also shown in these two studies. The authors of the published studies concluded that 5 mg NX1207 seems to be the optimal dosage. On the other hand, the patient numbers are very low. Before giving a general recommendation for NX1207, further studies are needed. There should be a large multicenter placebo-controlled validation study using 5 mg NX1207 with a follow-up of at least 5 years. At the moment, treatment with NX1207 is still experimental.
Table 1

Clinical impact summary for NX1207 on benign prostatic hyperplasia

Outcome measureEvidenceImplications
Disease-oriented evidencePreclinical studies in prostate cellsCaspases and Annexin V, as apoptotic markers, were detected in NX1207-treated cells in vivo and in vitro.
Patient-oriented evidenceThere are two Phase II studies available in the USA (Trials 0014 and 0016)NX1207 improves AUASI score after 90 days and leads to prostate volume reduction.9 In the second study, there was no inferiority compared to finasteride.10
Ongoing Phase IIIData is not available yet.13
Economic evidencePharmacoeconomic studies have not yet been conducted

Abbreviation: AUASI, American Urological Association Symptom Index.

  12 in total

1.  UroLift system for relief of prostate obstruction under local anesthesia.

Authors:  Jack Barkin; Jonathan Giddens; Peter Incze; Richard Casey; Stephen Richardson; Steven Gange
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.344

2.  Validation of a harmonized Spanish version of the IPSS: evidence of equivalence with the original American scale. International Prostate Symptom Score.

Authors:  X Badía; M García-Losa; R Dal-Ré; J Carballido; M Serra
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  The natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  John M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  The prevalence of prostatism: a population-based survey of urinary symptoms.

Authors:  C G Chute; L A Panser; C J Girman; J E Oesterling; H A Guess; S J Jacobsen; M M Lieber
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The potential for NX-1207 in benign prostatic hyperplasia: an update for clinicians.

Authors:  Neal Shore; Barrett Cowan
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic lymphocytes triggers specific recognition and removal by macrophages.

Authors:  V A Fadok; D R Voelker; P A Campbell; J J Cohen; D L Bratton; P M Henson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 7.  [Benign prostatic hyperplasia: background and diagnosis].

Authors:  C Gratzke; B Schlenker; P Weidlich; M Seitz; O Reich; C G Stief
Journal:  MMW Fortschr Med       Date:  2007-08-16

Review 8.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia progression and its impact on treatment.

Authors:  Bob Djavan; Matthias Waldert; Clemens Ghawidel; Michael Marberger
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age.

Authors:  S J Berry; D S Coffey; P C Walsh; L L Ewing
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics.

Authors:  J F Kerr; A H Wyllie; A R Currie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Emerging drugs to target lower urinary tract symptomatology (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): focus on the prostate.

Authors:  Stefan Ückert; George T Kedia; Dimitrios Tsikas; Annika Simon; Andreas Bannowsky; Markus A Kuczyk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Apoptotic Pathways Linked to Endocrine System as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Letteria Minutoli; Mariagrazia Rinaldi; Herbert Marini; Natasha Irrera; Giovanni Crea; Cesare Lorenzini; Domenico Puzzolo; Andrea Valenti; Antonina Pisani; Elena B Adamo; Domenica Altavilla; Francesco Squadrito; Antonio Micali
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Update on minimally invasive surgery and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Amanda S J Chung; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 4.  Expected Next-Generation Drugs Under Development in Relation to Voiding Symptoms.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Chung; Benjamin I Chung
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.835

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.