Literature DB >> 25156955

Gaze patterns of gross anatomy students change with classroom learning.

Ann C Zumwalt1, Arjun Iyer, Abenet Ghebremichael, Bruno S Frustace, Sean Flannery.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have documented that experts exhibit more efficient gaze patterns than those of less experienced individuals. In visual search tasks, experts use fewer, longer fixations to fixate for relatively longer on salient regions of the visual field while less experienced observers spend more time examining nonsalient regions. This study investigates whether changes in gaze patterns reflect learning by students in a medical gross anatomy course. Students were asked to examine photographs of dissections similar to those they experienced in class and to identify the tagged structure in each image. We postulated that, compared to naive behavior (behavior at baseline and when examining unfamiliar content) students would examine familiar content for longer and would direct proportionally more fixation time on cognitively salient regions of the images while using fewer, longer duration fixations. Our students examined familiar images for significantly longer than they did at baseline (P < 0.0001) or for unfamiliar images (P < 0.0001). They also spent significantly longer examining cognitively salient regions of familiar images, as compared to examining those regions at baseline (P < 0.0001) and on unfamiliar images (P < 0.0001). However, these gaze patterns were characterized by more numerous fixations rather than fewer, longer fixations. These individuals are successful learners in a challenging gross anatomy course, but are not experts in anatomy. Therefore we speculate that the gaze pattern they exhibit characterizes an earlier stage of the learning process than has previously been documented in studies of expertise, which have primarily focused on the gaze patterns of true experts.
© 2014 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  cognition; eye tracking; gaze tracking; gross anatomy education; learning assessment; learning outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25156955     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  3 in total

1.  Feasibility of eye-tracking technology to quantify expertise in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Authors:  T Kyle Harrison; T Edward Kim; Alex Kou; Cynthia Shum; Edward R Mariano; Steven K Howard
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Correlating Spatial Ability With Anatomy Assessment Performance: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Victoria A Roach; Misa Mi; Jason Mussell; Sonya E Van Nuland; Rebecca S Lufler; Kathryn M DeVeau; Stacey M Dunham; Polly Husmann; Hannah L Herriott; Danielle N Edwards; Alison F Doubleday; Brittany M Wilson; Adam B Wilson
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 6.652

3.  Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies.

Authors:  I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Ahmed Ghazi; Ashwin Sridhar; Danail Stoyanov; Mark Slack; John D Kelly; Justin W Collins
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.