Literature DB >> 25156911

The use of prosody during syntactic processing in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders.

Joshua John Diehl1, Carlyn Friedberg2, Rhea Paul3, Jesse Snedeker2.   

Abstract

In this study, we employed an eye-gaze paradigm to explore whether children (ages 8-12) and adolescents (ages 12-18) with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are able to use prosodic cues to determine the syntactic structure of an utterance. Persons with ASD were compared to typically developing (TD) peers matched on age, IQ, gender, and receptive language abilities. The stimuli were syntactically ambiguous but had a prosodic break that indicated the appropriate interpretation (feel the frog … with the feather vs. feel … the frog with the feather). We found that all groups were equally sensitive to the initial prosodic cues that were presented. Children and teens with ASD used prosody to interpret the ambiguous phrase as rapidly and efficiently as their TD peers. However, when a different cue was presented in subsequent trials, the younger ASD group was more likely to respond in a manner consistent with the initial prosodic cue rather than the new one. Eye-tracking data indicated that both younger groups (ASD and TD) had trouble shifting their interpretation as the prosodic cue changed, but the younger TD group was able to overcome this interference and produce an action consistent with the prosodic cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25156911     DOI: 10.1017/S0954579414000741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychopathol        ISSN: 0954-5794


  8 in total

1.  Spared bottom-up but impaired top-down interactive effects during naturalistic language processing in schizophrenia: evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

Authors:  Hugh Rabagliati; Nathaniel Delaney-Busch; Jesse Snedeker; Gina Kuperberg
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Prosodic Boundary Effects on Syntactic Disambiguation in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Talita Fortunato-Tavares; Richard G Schwartz; Klara Marton; Claudia F de Andrade; Derek Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The use of grammatical morphemes by Mandarin-speaking children with high functioning autism.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Stephen Crain; Liqun Gao; Ye Tang; Meixiang Jia
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-05

4.  Comprehension of Prosodically and Syntactically Marked Focus in Cantonese-Speaking Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Haoyan Ge; Fang Liu; Hoi Kwan Yuen; Aishu Chen; Virginia Yip
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-10-16

Review 5.  What Can Eye Movements Tell Us about Subtle Cognitive Processing Differences in Autism?

Authors:  Philippa L Howard; Li Zhang; Valerie Benson
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-24

6.  The Multidimensional Battery of Prosody Perception (MBOPP).

Authors:  Kyle Jasmin; Frederic Dick; Adam Taylor Tierney
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-10-06

7.  The Oscillopathic Nature of Language Deficits in Autism: From Genes to Language Evolution.

Authors:  Antonio Benítez-Burraco; Elliot Murphy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Interface of Syntax with Pragmatics and Prosody in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Arhonto Terzi; Theodoros Marinis; Kostantinos Francis
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.