Ganesh Asaithambi1, Xin Tong2, Mary G George2, Albert W Tsai3, James M Peacock3, Russell V Luepker4, Kamakshi Lakshminarayan5. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. Electronic address: ganesh785@gmail.com. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota. 4. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 5. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) recommended an expansion of the time window for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) reperfusion with intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) from 3 to 4.5 hours after symptom onset. We examine rates of IV and intra-arterial (IA) reperfusion before and after the recommendations to track guideline adoption in community practice. METHODS: Patients with AIS in the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry spanning years 2007-2012 were identified. Trends in rates of IV rt-PA versus IA therapy were examined. Outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), in-hospital mortality, ability to ambulate at discharge, and discharge destination. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2012, there were 182,235 AIS patients (median age, 72 years; 51.5% women) in the database at the time of analysis. AIS patients receiving IV rt-PA increased significantly from 3.7% in 2007 to 5.1% in 2012 in the ≤3 hours time window and from .2% in 2007 to 1.3% in 2012 in the 3-4.5 hours time window (P < .001 for both). There was also a significant increase in the rate of IA therapy between 2007 and 2012 (P < .001). There was a significant decrease in the rate of sICH among patients who received any reperfusion between 2007 and 2012. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend for increased utilization of IV rt-PA in the 0-3 hours and the 3-4.5 hours time windows, which began around the same time as the publication of AHA/ASA recommendations in 2009. This increase was associated with an increase in IA treatment rates along with a decrease in overall sICH rates for patients receiving any reperfusion.
BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) recommended an expansion of the time window for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) reperfusion with intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) from 3 to 4.5 hours after symptom onset. We examine rates of IV and intra-arterial (IA) reperfusion before and after the recommendations to track guideline adoption in community practice. METHODS:Patients with AIS in the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry spanning years 2007-2012 were identified. Trends in rates of IV rt-PA versus IA therapy were examined. Outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), in-hospital mortality, ability to ambulate at discharge, and discharge destination. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2012, there were 182,235 AIS patients (median age, 72 years; 51.5% women) in the database at the time of analysis. AIS patients receiving IV rt-PA increased significantly from 3.7% in 2007 to 5.1% in 2012 in the ≤3 hours time window and from .2% in 2007 to 1.3% in 2012 in the 3-4.5 hours time window (P < .001 for both). There was also a significant increase in the rate of IA therapy between 2007 and 2012 (P < .001). There was a significant decrease in the rate of sICH among patients who received any reperfusion between 2007 and 2012. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend for increased utilization of IV rt-PA in the 0-3 hours and the 3-4.5 hours time windows, which began around the same time as the publication of AHA/ASA recommendations in 2009. This increase was associated with an increase in IA treatment rates along with a decrease in overall sICH rates for patients receiving any reperfusion.
Authors: Kennedy R Lees; Erich Bluhmki; Rüdiger von Kummer; Thomas G Brott; Danilo Toni; James C Grotta; Gregory W Albers; Markku Kaste; John R Marler; Scott A Hamilton; Barbara C Tilley; Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Werner Hacke; Kathryn Allen; Jochen Mau; Dieter Meier; Gregory del Zoppo; D A De Silva; K S Butcher; M W Parsons; P A Barber; C Levi; C Bladin; G Byrnes Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Adnan I Qureshi; Saqib A Chaudhry; Biggya L Sapkota; Gustavo J Rodriguez; M Fareed K Suri Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Felipe de Los Ríos la Rosa; Jane Khoury; Brett M Kissela; Matthew L Flaherty; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Pooja Khatri; Opeolu Adeoye; Daniel Woo; Simona Ferioli; Dawn O Kleindorfer Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Martin Pitt; Thomas Monks; Paritosh Agarwal; David Worthington; Gary A Ford; Kennedy R Lees; Ken Stein; Martin A James Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mary G George; Xin Tong; Henraya McGruder; Paula Yoon; Wayne Rosamond; Andrea Winquist; Judith Hinchey; Hilary K Wall; Dilip K Pandey Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2009-11-06
Authors: Joseph P Broderick; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Sharon D Yeatts; Pooja Khatri; Michael D Hill; Edward C Jauch; Tudor G Jovin; Bernard Yan; Frank L Silver; Rüdiger von Kummer; Carlos A Molina; Bart M Demaerschalk; Ronald Budzik; Wayne M Clark; Osama O Zaidat; Tim W Malisch; Mayank Goyal; Wouter J Schonewille; Mikael Mazighi; Stefan T Engelter; Craig Anderson; Judith Spilker; Janice Carrozzella; Karla J Ryckborst; L Scott Janis; Renée H Martin; Lydia D Foster; Thomas A Tomsick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245