Robyn P Cant1, Simon J Cooper2. 1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, 100 Clyde Road, Berwick, Victoria 3806, Australia. Electronic address: Robyn.Cant@monash.edu. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, 100 Clyde Road, Berwick, Victoria 3806, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Brighton, UK. Electronic address: Simon.J.Cooper@monash.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to review the literature on utilisation and place of Web-based simulation within nursing education. Web-based simulation combines electronic multimedia options with a central video or virtual world to produce interactive learning activities mediated by the learner. DESIGN: An integrative review. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of healthcare databases between 2000 and 2014 and of Internet sources for hosted simulation programs in nursing. Eighteen primary programs were identified for inclusion. REVIEW METHODS: A strategy for integrative review was adopted in which studies were identified, filtered, classified, analysed and compared. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 18 programs, two game-based programs were identified which represented a 'virtual world' in which students could simultaneously or individually immerse themselves in a character role-play. However, most programs (n=10) taught an aspect of procedural patient care using multimedia (e.g. video, audio, graphics, quiz, text, memo). Time-limited sequences, feedback and reflective activities were often incorporated. Other studies (n=8) taught interpersonal communication skills or technical skills for equipment use. Descriptive study outcomes indicated ease of program use, strong satisfaction with learning and appreciation of program accessibility. Additionally, four studies reported significant improvements in knowledge post-intervention. CONCLUSION: Web-based simulation is highly acceptable to students and appears to provide learning benefits that align with other simulation approaches and it augments face-to-face teaching. Web-based simulation is likely to have a major place in nursing curricula in the next decade, yet further research is necessary to objectively evaluate learner outcomes and to justify its use.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to review the literature on utilisation and place of Web-based simulation within nursing education. Web-based simulation combines electronic multimedia options with a central video or virtual world to produce interactive learning activities mediated by the learner. DESIGN: An integrative review. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of healthcare databases between 2000 and 2014 and of Internet sources for hosted simulation programs in nursing. Eighteen primary programs were identified for inclusion. REVIEW METHODS: A strategy for integrative review was adopted in which studies were identified, filtered, classified, analysed and compared. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 18 programs, two game-based programs were identified which represented a 'virtual world' in which students could simultaneously or individually immerse themselves in a character role-play. However, most programs (n=10) taught an aspect of procedural patient care using multimedia (e.g. video, audio, graphics, quiz, text, memo). Time-limited sequences, feedback and reflective activities were often incorporated. Other studies (n=8) taught interpersonal communication skills or technical skills for equipment use. Descriptive study outcomes indicated ease of program use, strong satisfaction with learning and appreciation of program accessibility. Additionally, four studies reported significant improvements in knowledge post-intervention. CONCLUSION: Web-based simulation is highly acceptable to students and appears to provide learning benefits that align with other simulation approaches and it augments face-to-face teaching. Web-based simulation is likely to have a major place in nursing curricula in the next decade, yet further research is necessary to objectively evaluate learner outcomes and to justify its use.
Authors: Hege Vistven Stenseth; Simen Alexander Steindal; Marianne Trygg Solberg; Mia Alexandra Ølnes; Andrea Mohallem; Anne Lene Sørensen; Camilla Strandell-Laine; Camilla Olaussen; Caroline Farsjø Aure; Fernando Riegel; Ingunn Pedersen; Jaroslav Zlamal; Jussara Gue Martini; Paula Bresolin; Silje Christin Wang Linnerud; Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-04-04
Authors: Sok Ying Liaw; Lai Fun Wong; Sally Wai-Chi Chan; Jasmine Tze Yin Ho; Siti Zubaidah Mordiffi; Sophia Bee Leng Ang; Poh Sun Goh; Emily Neo Kim Ang Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Barbara Sinclair; Richard Booth; Josephine McMurray; Gillian Strudwick; Gavan Watson; Hanif Ladak; Merrick Zwarenstein; Susan McBride; Ryan Chan; Laura Brennan Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-05-28
Authors: Jonathan Currie; Raymond R Bond; Paul McCullagh; Pauline Black; Dewar D Finlay; Stephen Gallagher; Peter Kearney; Aaron Peace; Danail Stoyanov; Colin D Bicknell; Stephen Leslie; Anthony G Gallagher Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Michelle Aebersold; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Leila Cherara; Monica Weber; Christina Khouri; Robert Levine; Alan R Tait Journal: Clin Simul Nurs Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.391
Authors: Geneviève Rouleau; Jérôme Pelletier; José Côté; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Valérie Martel-Laferrière; Rock Lévesque; Guillaume Fontaine Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 5.428