Literature DB >> 25155712

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a highly genetic condition partly mediated by disc degeneration.

Michele C Battié1, Alfredo Ortega-Alonso, Riikka Niemelainen, Kevin Gill, Esko Levalahti, Tapio Videman, Jaakko Kaprio.   

Abstract

Objective. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most commonly diagnosed spinal disorders in older adults. Although the pathophysiology of the clinical syndrome is not well understood, a narrow central canal or intervertebral foramen is an essential or defining feature. The aim of the present study was to estimate the magnitude of genetic versus environmental influences on central lumbar spinal stenosis and to investigate disc degeneration and stature or bone development as possible genetic pathways.Methods. A classic twin study with multivariate analyses considering lumbar level and other covariates was conducted. The study sample comprised 598 male twins (147 monozygotic and 152 dizygotic pairs), 35-70 years of age, from the population-based Finnish Twin Cohort. The primary phenotypes were central lumbar stenosis as assessed qualitatively on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantitatively measured dural sac cross-sectional area. Additional phenotypes (to examine possible genetic pathways) included disc bulging and standing height, as an indicator of overall skeletal size or development.Results. The heritability estimate (h²) for qualitatively assessed central lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI was 66.9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 56.8,74.5). The broad-sense heritability estimate for dural sac cross-sectional area was 81.2% (95% CI 74.5, 86.1),with a similar magnitude of genetic influences across lumbar levels (h²=72.4–75.6). The additive genetic correlation of quantitatively assessed stenosis and disc bulging was extremely high. There was no indication of shared genetic influences between stenosis and stature.Conclusion. Central lumbar spinal stenosis and associated dural sac dimensions are highly genetic, and disc degeneration (bulging) appears to be one pathway through which genes influence spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25155712      PMCID: PMC4308556          DOI: 10.1002/art.38823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  4 in total

1.  Structured latent growth curves for twin data.

Authors:  M C Neale; J J McArdle
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  Genetics of disc-related disorders: current findings and lessons from other complex diseases.

Authors:  Annu Näkki; Michele C Battié; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Genetic and environmental effects on disc degeneration by phenotype and spinal level: a multivariate twin study.

Authors:  Michele C Battié; Tapio Videman; Esko Levälahti; Kevin Gill; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The Twin Spine Study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration.

Authors:  Michele C Battié; Tapio Videman; Jaakko Kaprio; Laura E Gibbons; Kevin Gill; Hannu Manninen; Janna Saarela; Leena Peltonen
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Downregulation of microRNA-193a-3p is involved in invertebral disc degeneration by targeting MMP14.

Authors:  Ming-Liang Ji; Xue-Jun Zhang; Pei-Liang Shi; Jun Lu; Shan-Zheng Wang; Qing Chang; Hui Chen; Chen Wang
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Dimensional changes of cervical and lumbar bony spinal canals in one generation in Western Switzerland: a computed tomography study.

Authors:  Arnaud Monier; Patrick Omoumi; Stéphanie Schizas; Fabio Becce; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Change in onset times of the abdominal muscles following functional task in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hyun Seung Song; Seong Doo Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2014-10-31

4.  The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Neda Zamani; Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-03-06

5.  The paradoxical relationship between ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and developmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Vivian Tam; Victor Yu Leong Leung; Dino Samartzis; Kenneth Man-Chee Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-09-05

6.  Characteristics and determinants of clinical symptoms in radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis in a tertiary health care centre in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Marie Doualla-Bija; Mbeng Ashu Takang; Emmanuella Mankaa; Jude Moutchia; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo; Henry Luma-Namme
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Current concepts and recent advances in understanding and managing lumbar spine stenosis.

Authors:  Carlos Bagley; Matthew MacAllister; Luke Dosselman; Jessica Moreno; Salah G Aoun; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-31

8.  Circular RNA hsa_circ_0001658 Inhibits Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Development by Regulating hsa-miR-181c-5p/FAS.

Authors:  Ge-Dong Meng; Bao-Shan Xu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Genome-wide association studies of low back pain and lumbar spinal disorders using electronic health record data identify a locus associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; Ian B Stanaway; Yanfei Zhang; Maxim B Freidin; Yakov A Tsepilov; David S Carrell; Frances M K Williams; Yurii S Aulchenko; Hakon Hakonarson; Bahram Namjou; David R Crosslin; Gail P Jarvik; Ming Ta Lee
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 7.926

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.