Literature DB >> 25155428

Randomized phase 2 study of bone-targeted therapy containing strontium-89 in advanced castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.

Mehmet Asim Bilen1, Marcella M Johnson, Paul Mathew, Lance C Pagliaro, John C Araujo, Ana Aparicio, Paul G Corn, Nizar M Tannir, Franklin C Wong, Michael J Fisch, Christopher J Logothetis, Shi-Ming Tu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiopharmaceutical use may improve the survival time of patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases. Whether androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with bone-targeted therapy provides a clinical benefit to patients with advanced castrate-sensitive prostate cancer has not been investigated.
METHODS: Eighty male patients were enrolled, and 79 were randomized: 40 to the control arm and 39 to the strontium-89 (Sr-89) arm. After randomization, patients in both study arms received ADT, doxorubicin, and zoledronic acid. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) time. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the effects of Sr-89 after controlling for the number of bone metastases.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time for the 29 patients alive at the last follow-up was 76.9 months (range, 0.07-103.4 months). The median PFS time was 18.5 months (95% confidence interval, 9.7-49.4 months) for the control arm and 12.9 months (95% confidence interval, 8.9-72.5 months) for the Sr-89 arm (P = .86). No patient developed myelodysplastic syndrome or a hematologic malignancy. An unplanned subgroup analysis suggested increased efficacy of bone-targeted therapy with a greater extent of bone involvement (ie, >6 bone metastases vs ≤6 bone metastases on the bone scan).
CONCLUSIONS: The data showed that bone-targeted therapy using 1 dose of Sr-89 combined with chemohormonal ablation therapy did not favorably affect the PFS of patients with castrate-sensitive prostate cancer. The combined therapy was feasible and safe. Whether such bone-targeted therapy provides a favorable outcome for those patients with a greater tumor burden in the bone warrants further investigation.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone metastasis; phase 2; prostate cancer; radiopharmaceutical; strontium-89

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25155428      PMCID: PMC4270821          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

Review 1.  Acute myelogenous leukemia after exposure to strontium-89 for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  S E Kossman; M A Weiss
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan.

Authors:  M S Soloway; S W Hardeman; D Hickey; J Raymond; B Todd; S Soloway; M Moinuddin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Nuclear bone imaging in metastatic cancer of the prostate.

Authors:  J J Pollen; K Gerber; W L Ashburn; J D Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Huggins; C V Hodges
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1972 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Reduced incidence of bone metastases in irradiated areas after external radiation therapy of prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  H Jacobsson; I Näslund
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Bone-targeted therapy for advanced androgen-independent carcinoma of the prostate: a randomised phase II trial.

Authors:  S M Tu; R E Millikan; B Mengistu; E S Delpassand; R J Amato; L C Pagliaro; D Daliani; C N Papandreou; T L Smith; J Kim; D A Podoloff; C J Logothetis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-02-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Osteoblastic response to successful treatment of metastatic cancer of the prostate.

Authors:  J J Pollen; W J Shlaer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone.

Authors:  Yibin Kang; Peter M Siegel; Weiping Shu; Maria Drobnjak; Sanna M Kakonen; Carlos Cordón-Cardo; Theresa A Guise; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche.

Authors:  L M Calvi; G B Adams; K W Weibrecht; J M Weber; D P Olson; M C Knight; R P Martin; E Schipani; P Divieti; F R Bringhurst; L A Milner; H M Kronenberg; D T Scadden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The combination of cyproterone acetate and low dose diethylstilbestrol in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  S L Goldenberg; N Bruchovsky; P S Rennie; C M Coppin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bone-Targeted Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrei H Iagaru; Erik Mittra; Patrick M Colletti; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Radium-223-Dichloride in Castration Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer-Preliminary Results of the Response Evaluation Using F-18-Fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Kalevi Kairemo; Timo Joensuu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.