Literature DB >> 25155240

Risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition in intensive care units: a prospective multicentre study.

A-G Venier1, C Leroyer2, C Slekovec3, D Talon3, X Bertrand3, S Parer4, S Alfandari5, J-M Guerin6, B Megarbane7, C Lawrence8, B Clair9, A Lepape10, M Perraud11, P Cassier11, D Trivier12, A Boyer13, V Dubois14, J Asselineau15, A-M Rogues16, R Thiébaut17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major nosocomial pathogen in intensive care units (ICUs); however, endogenous versus exogenous origin of contamination remains unclear. AIM: To identify individual and environmental ICU risk factors for P. aeruginosa acquisition.
METHODS: A five-month prospective multicentric study was performed in ten French ICUs. Adult patients hospitalized in ICU for ≥ 24 h were included and screened for P. aeruginosa colonization on admission, weekly and before discharge. P. aeruginosa acquisition was defined by a subsequent colonization or infection if screening swabs on admission were negative. Water samples were obtained weekly on water taps of the ICUs. Data on patient characteristics, invasive devices exposure, antimicrobial therapy, P. aeruginosa water and patient colonization pressures, and ICU characteristics were collected. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using multivariate Cox model.
FINDINGS: Among the 1314 patients without P. aeruginosa on admission, 201 (15%) acquired P. aeruginosa during their ICU stay. Individual characteristics significantly associated with P. aeruginosa acquisition were history of previous P. aeruginosa infection or colonization, cumulative duration of mechanical ventilation and cumulative days of antibiotics not active against P. aeruginosa. Environmental risk factors for P. aeruginosa acquisition were cumulative daily ward 'nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score' (NEMS) [hazard ratio (HR): 1.47 for ≥ 30 points; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-2.03] and contaminated tap water in patient's room (HR: 1.76; CI: 1.09-2.84).
CONCLUSION: Individual risk factors and environmental factors for which intervention is possible were identified for P. aeruginosa acquisition.
Copyright © 2014 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-transmission; Hospital environment; Infection control; Intensive care unit; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25155240     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  21 in total

1.  Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Burn Patients.

Authors:  Laura Ruegsegger; Jamie Xiao; Arash Naziripour; Trey Kanumuambidi; Dylan Brown; Felicia Williams; Steven H Marshall; Susan D Rudin; Kelly Yen; Tingyu Chu; Liang Chen; Emanuele Sozzi; Luther Bartelt; Barry Kreiswirth; Robert A Bonomo; David van Duin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  Acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its resistance phenotypes in critically ill medical patients: role of colonization pressure and antibiotic exposure.

Authors:  Nazaret Cobos-Trigueros; Mar Solé; Pedro Castro; Jorge Luis Torres; Cristina Hernández; Mariano Rinaudo; Sara Fernández; Álex Soriano; José María Nicolás; Josep Mensa; Jordi Vila; José Antonio Martínez
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Cold Plasma Inactivation of Bacterial Biofilms and Reduction of Quorum Sensing Regulated Virulence Factors.

Authors:  Dana Ziuzina; Daniela Boehm; Sonal Patil; P J Cullen; Paula Bourke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Disruption of the microbiota across multiple body sites in critically ill children.

Authors:  Matthew B Rogers; Brian Firek; Min Shi; Andrew Yeh; Rachel Brower-Sinning; Victoria Aveson; Brittany L Kohl; Anthony Fabio; Joseph A Carcillo; Michael J Morowitz
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 5.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa in premise plumbing of large buildings.

Authors:  Emilie Bédard; Michèle Prévost; Eric Déziel
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Regev Cohen; Frida Babushkin; Shoshana Cohen; Marina Afraimov; Maurice Shapiro; Martina Uda; Efrat Khabra; Amos Adler; Ronen Ben Ami; Svetlana Paikin
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.887

7.  Benefits and unintended consequences of antimicrobial de-escalation: Implications for stewardship programs.

Authors:  Josie Hughes; Xi Huo; Lindsey Falk; Amy Hurford; Kunquan Lan; Bryan Coburn; Andrew Morris; Jianhong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Patient autonomy and disclosure of material information about hospital-acquired infections.

Authors:  Sorin Hostiuc; Arthur-Jozsef Molnar; Alin Moldoveanu; Maria Aluaş; Florica Moldoveanu; Iuliana Bocicor; Maria-Iuliana Dascalu; Elisabeta Bădilă; Mihaela Hostiuc; Ionut Negoi
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Risk factors for colonization and infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients hospitalized in intensive care units in France.

Authors:  S Hoang; A Georget; J Asselineau; A-G Venier; C Leroyer; A M Rogues; R Thiébaut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Risk factors and the resistance mechanisms involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Stéphanie Druge; Stéphanie Ruiz; Fanny Vardon-Bounes; Marion Grare; François Labaste; Thierry Seguin; Olivier Fourcade; Vincent Minville; Jean-Marie Conil; Bernard Georges
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2019-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.