Literature DB >> 25155204

Function and osteoarthritis progression after arthroscopic treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: a prospective study after a mean follow-up of 4.6 (4.2-5.5) years.

T Gicquel1, J-E Gédouin2, N Krantz3, O May3, P Gicquel4, N Bonin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after arthroscopic femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) surgery are promising in the short-term but have rarely been evaluated in the mid-term (e.g., about 5 years). Here, our objectives were to obtain mid-term data on functional and radiographic outcomes, to identify prognostic factors, and to determine the mid-term rate of arthroplasty revision with the associated risk factors. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the results of arthroscopic FAI surgery were sustained over time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective multi-surgeon study of 53 Tönnis grade 0 or 1 hips treated arthroscopically for symptomatic FAI (23 cam, 10 pincer, and 20 mixed deformities). We obtained short-term (10 months) and mid-term (4.6 years) data on the functional outcome (WOMAC and satisfaction scores), proportion of patients without revision arthroplasty, and development of osteoarthritis (graded using the Tönnis classification).
RESULTS: In the patients without revision arthroplasty, the WOMAC score improved significantly (P<0.01) from baseline (61.4 ± 15.6) to 10 months (84.2 ± 15.6) and last follow-up (85.2 ± 15.5) but remained unchanged between the two postoperative time points, confirming the stability of the results. The proportion of satisfied patients was 79% after 10 months and 68% (36/53) at last follow-up (NS). Osteoarthritis developed in 13/35 (37%) hips for which radiographs were obtained at last follow-up. At last follow-up, 46/53 hips (87%; 95%CI, 78-96) did not required revision surgery; arthroplasty was required in the 7 remaining hips. The main prognostic factor was the preoperative osteoarthritis Tönnis grade: at last follow-up, compared to Tönnis grade 0 hips, Tönnis grade 1 hips had lower WOMAC scores (77 vs. 88), lower satisfaction rates (50% versus 77%), a higher rate of osteoarthritis progression (57% versus 24%), and a higher rate of arthroplasty (33.3% versus 2.9%). DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with published data. The outcomes of arthroscopic FAI surgery are sustained over time and the preoperative osteoarthritis status is the main predictor of mid-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective cohort study.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage; Femoro-acetabular impingement; Hip; Labrum; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25155204     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  15 in total

1.  What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?

Authors:  Pascal Cyrill Haefeli; Christoph Emanuel Albers; Simon Damian Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Lorenz Büchler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Total volume of cam deformity alone predicts outcome in arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Sarah H Ellis; Diana M Perriman; Alexander W R Burns; Teresa M Neeman; Joseph T Lynch; Paul N Smith
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Radiographic outcomes reporting after arthroscopic management of femoroaceabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ivan Dzaja; Kyle Martin; Jeffrey Kay; Muzammil Memon; Andrew Duong; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

4.  Previous arthroscopic repair of femoro-acetabular impingement does not affect outcomes of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan Charles; Scott LaTulip; James A Goulet; Aidin Eslam Pour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Treatment options for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Hans Gollwitzer
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-05-23

6.  Femoroacetabular impingement and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Charlie Zhang; Linda Li; Bruce B Forster; Jacek A Kopec; Charles Ratzlaff; Lalji Halai; Jolanda Cibere; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Quality Assessment of Prospective Cohort Studies Evaluating Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Axel Öhlin; Louise Karlsson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Páll Jónasson; Mattias Ahldén; Adad Baranto; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 8.  Predictors of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Olawale A Sogbein; Ajay Shah; Jeffrey Kay; Muzammil Memon; Nicole Simunovic; Etienne L Belzile; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-19

9.  Outcome of hip arthroscopy in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis-A prospective study.

Authors:  Mikael Sansone; Mattias Ahldén; Pall Jonasson; Christoffer Thomeé; Leif Swärd; David Collin; Adad Baranto; Jón Karlsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-12-26

10.  Multicenter outcomes of arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement in the community hospital setting.

Authors:  Dean K Matsuda; Monti Khatod; Francois Antounian; Raoul Burchette; Stefano Bini; Faith F Anthony; Jessica Harris; Charito Calipusan
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.