Literature DB >> 25154772

The impact of routine assessment of past or current mental health on help-seeking in the perinatal period.

Nicole Reilly1, Sheree Harris2, Deborah Loxton2, Catherine Chojenta2, Peta Forder2, Marie-Paule Austin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines now recommend that women be asked about their past or current mental health as a routine component of maternity care. However, the value of this line of enquiry in increasing engagement with support services, as required, remains controversial. AIM: The current study aimed to examine whether assessment of past or current mental health, received with or without referral for additional support, is associated with help-seeking during pregnancy and the postpartum.
METHODS: A subsample of women drawn from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (young cohort) who reported experiencing significant emotional distress during pregnancy (N=398) or in the 12 months following birth (N=380) participated in the study.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that women who were not asked about their emotional health were less likely to seek any formal help during both pregnancy (adjOR=0.09, 95%CI: 0.04-0.24) and the postpartum (adjOR=0.07, 95%CI: 0.02-0.13), as were women who were asked about these issues but who were not referred for additional support (antenatal: adjOR=0.26, 95%CI: 0.15-0.45; postnatal: adjOR=0.14, 95%CI: 0.07-0.27). However, considerable levels of consultation with general practitioners, midwives and child health nurses, even in the absence of referral, were evident.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that enquiry by a health professional about women's past or current mental health is associated with help-seeking throughout the perinatal period. The clinical and resource implications of these findings for the primary health care sector should be considered prior to the implementation of future routine perinatal depression screening or psychosocial assessment programmes.
Copyright © 2014 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Help seeking; Perinatal; Psychosocial assessment; Referral; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25154772     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  6 in total

1.  Sleep Problem Trajectories and Cumulative Socio-Ecological Risks: Birth to School-Age.

Authors:  Ariel A Williamson; Jodi A Mindell; Harriet Hiscock; Jon Quach
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Antenatal psychosocial risk status and Australian women's use of primary care and specialist mental health services in the year after birth: a prospective study.

Authors:  Virginia Schmied; Rachel Langdon; Stephen Matthey; Lynn Kemp; Marie-Paule Austin; Maree Johnson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  "We do not know how to screen and provide treatment": a qualitative study of barriers and enablers of implementing perinatal depression health services in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abel Fekadu Dadi; Emma R Miller; Telake Azale; Lillian Mwanri
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2021-05-05

4.  Attitudes and Engagement of Pregnant and Postnatal Women With a Web-Based Emotional Health Tool (Mummatters): Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Nicole Reilly; Marie-Paule Austin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Implementing a Perinatal Depression Screening in Clinical Routine: Exploring the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Thuy Giang Trinh; Cornelia E Schwarze; Mitho Müller; Maren Goetz; Kathrin Hassdenteufel; Markus Wallwiener; Stephanie Wallwiener
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Evolution of Postpartum Weight and Body Composition after Excessive Gestational Weight Gain: The Role of Lifestyle Behaviors-Data from the INTER-ACT Control Group.

Authors:  Margriet Bijlholt; Lieveke Ameye; Hanne van Uytsel; Roland Devlieger; Annick Bogaerts
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.