Literature DB >> 25154677

Comparison of starting ovarian stimulation on day 2 versus day 15 of the menstrual cycle in the same oocyte donor and pregnancy rates among the corresponding recipients of vitrified oocytes.

Francisca Martínez1, Elisabet Clua2, Marta Devesa2, Ignacio Rodríguez2, Gemma Arroyo2, Clara González2, Miquel Solé2, Rosa Tur2, Buenaventura Coroleu2, Pedro N Barri2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer in recipients of embryos from donor oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation initiated on day 2 (D2) or day 15 (D15) of the menstrual cycle with a secondary end point of comparing the response to stimulation.
DESIGN: Prospective observational comparative study.
SETTING: Private in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. PATIENT(S): Oocyte donors (OD) and recipients. INTERVENTION(S): Donors stimulated within 3 months, starting on day 2 or day 15 after bleeding, with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, and GnRH agonist trigger, and oocytes vitrified and later assigned to recipients, followed by routine IVF procedures one to two embryos transferred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome pregnancy rate, and secondary outcome number of mature oocytes retrieved. RESULT(S): Nine D2 and nine D15 cycles were performed in nine donors. There were no differences between D2 and D15 in the number of mature oocytes obtained (14.0±6.96 vs. 16.89±7.52). To date, 20 recipients have received vitrified oocytes (8 recipients received D2 oocytes and 12 recipients received D15 oocytes). There were no differences between the groups of recipients in fertilization rate (77.3% vs. 76.5%) or number of embryos transferred (1.50±0.53 vs. 1.67±0.65). Twelve clinical pregnancies were obtained. No differences were noted in pregnancy rates (62.5% vs. 58.3%) or implantation rates (41.67% vs. 45%) between recipients of D2 oocytes and recipients of D15 oocytes. CONCLUSION(S): Donor oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation initiated on day 15 of the cycle achieve good pregnancy rates. This information is useful for patients with cancer undergoing fertility preservation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 01645241.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Luteal phase ovarian stimulation; fertility preservation; oocyte recipients; oocyte vitrification; pregnancy rates

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25154677     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian manipulation in ART: going beyond physiological standards to provide best clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Israel Ortega; Juan A García-Velasco; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Similar miRNomic signatures characterize the follicular fluids collected after follicular and luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Ramona Carmelo; Elvira Immacolata Parrotta; Stefania Scalise; Gianluca Santamaria; Erminia Alviggi; Maria Teresa De Angelis; Gianmarco Sarro; Alberto Vaiarelli; Roberta Venturella; Laura Rienzi; Fulvio Zullo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Giovanni Cuda
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C E Boots; M Meister; A R Cooper; A Hardi; E S Jungheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Oncofertility: Meeting the Fertility Goals of Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  H Irene Su; Yuton Tony Lee; Ronald Barr
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 5.  ART outcomes following ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase:a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Buo-Jia Lu; Chien-Ju Lin; Bou-Zenn Lin; Li Huang; Li-Ting Chien; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  An extremely patient-friendly and efficient stimulation protocol for assisted reproductive technology in normal and high responders.

Authors:  Chen-Yu Huang; Guan-Yeu Chen; Miawh-Lirng Shieh; Hsin-Yang Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Silvia Colamaria; Elisabetta Trabucco; Carlo Alviggi; Roberta Venturella; Erminia Alviggi; Ramona Carmelo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Prolonged pituitary down-regulation with full-dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in different menstrual cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yingfen Ying; Tanchu Yang; Huina Zhang; Chang Liu; Junzhao Zhao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer: Practical issues.

Authors:  So Yun Park; Kyungah Jeong; Eun Hye Cho; Hye Won Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2020-11-02

10.  Double Stimulation in the Same Ovarian Cycle (DuoStim) to Maximize the Number of Oocytes Retrieved From Poor Prognosis Patients: A Multicenter Experience and SWOT Analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Elisabetta Trabucco; Roberta Vallefuoco; Laura Buffo; Ludovica Dusi; Fabrizio Fiorini; Nicoletta Barnocchi; Francesco Maria Bulletti; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.