Ming Chang1, Gunnel Tybring, Marja-Liisa Dahl, Jonatan D Lindh. 1. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge C1:68, SE-141 86, Stockholm, Sweden, ming.chang@ki.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Citalopram and escitalopram, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, are primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, which is a highly polymorphic enzyme known to cause inter-individual differences in pharmacokinetics. However, the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on citalopram or escitalopram exposure has yet to be fully clarified, especially with regard to the quantitative impact of the CYP2C19*17 allele. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of functional CYP2C19 allele variants on citalopram/escitalopram exposure. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with a structured search algorithm and eligibility criteria for including related studies, calculating the change of citalopram or escitalopram exposure associated with CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 as compared with CYP2C19*1 using fixed-effect and random-effects models. Assessment of publication bias was performed by means of funnel plots and sensitivity analysis using meta-regressions. The pre-defined review protocol was registered at the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews, registration number CRD42013004106. RESULTS: Sixteen studies from 14 publications met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies included 847 patients from psychiatric patient trials and 140 healthy subjects from pharmacokinetic studies. Compared to subjects with the EM/EM (CYP2C19*1/*1) genotype, the exposure to (es)citalopram increased by 95 % (95 % CI 40-149, p < 0.0001) in the poor metabolizer (PM)/PM (CYP2C19*2 or *3/*2 or *3), 30 % (95 % CI 4-55, p < 0.05) in the extensive metabolizer (EM)/PM (CYP2C19*1/*2 or *3), and 25 % (95 % CI 1-49, p < 0.05) in the ultrarapid metabolizer (UM)/PM (CYP2C19*17/*2 or *3) groups. In contrast, the exposure to (es)citalopram decreased by 36 % (95 % CI 27-46, p < 0.0001) in the UM/UM (CYP2C19*17/*17) and by 14 % (95 % CI 1-27, p < 0.05) in the UM/EM (CYP2C19*17/*1). INTERPRETATION: This is the first meta-analysis based on a systematic review of accumulated information that addresses the relationship between CYP2C19 genotypes and the exposure to citalopram or escitalopram. All functional CYP2C19 genotype groups demonstrated significant effects on (es)citalopram exposure. The findings based on our pooled analysis are likely to help in understanding the inter-individual variability in the exposure to citalopram and escitalopram in psychiatric patients and to facilitate dose selection, particularly for the homozygous carriers of CYP2C19*2 or *3 (loss of function) and CYP2C19*17 (gain of function) alleles. The results could improve individualization of citalopram or escitalopram therapy and could also be used for physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling as well as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling.
BACKGROUND:Citalopram and escitalopram, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, are primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, which is a highly polymorphic enzyme known to cause inter-individual differences in pharmacokinetics. However, the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on citalopram or escitalopram exposure has yet to be fully clarified, especially with regard to the quantitative impact of the CYP2C19*17 allele. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of functional CYP2C19 allele variants on citalopram/escitalopram exposure. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with a structured search algorithm and eligibility criteria for including related studies, calculating the change of citalopram or escitalopram exposure associated with CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 as compared with CYP2C19*1 using fixed-effect and random-effects models. Assessment of publication bias was performed by means of funnel plots and sensitivity analysis using meta-regressions. The pre-defined review protocol was registered at the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews, registration number CRD42013004106. RESULTS: Sixteen studies from 14 publications met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies included 847 patients from psychiatricpatient trials and 140 healthy subjects from pharmacokinetic studies. Compared to subjects with the EM/EM (CYP2C19*1/*1) genotype, the exposure to (es)citalopram increased by 95 % (95 % CI 40-149, p < 0.0001) in the poor metabolizer (PM)/PM (CYP2C19*2 or *3/*2 or *3), 30 % (95 % CI 4-55, p < 0.05) in the extensive metabolizer (EM)/PM (CYP2C19*1/*2 or *3), and 25 % (95 % CI 1-49, p < 0.05) in the ultrarapid metabolizer (UM)/PM (CYP2C19*17/*2 or *3) groups. In contrast, the exposure to (es)citalopram decreased by 36 % (95 % CI 27-46, p < 0.0001) in the UM/UM (CYP2C19*17/*17) and by 14 % (95 % CI 1-27, p < 0.05) in the UM/EM (CYP2C19*17/*1). INTERPRETATION: This is the first meta-analysis based on a systematic review of accumulated information that addresses the relationship between CYP2C19 genotypes and the exposure to citalopram or escitalopram. All functional CYP2C19 genotype groups demonstrated significant effects on (es)citalopram exposure. The findings based on our pooled analysis are likely to help in understanding the inter-individual variability in the exposure to citalopram and escitalopram in psychiatricpatients and to facilitate dose selection, particularly for the homozygous carriers of CYP2C19*2 or *3 (loss of function) and CYP2C19*17 (gain of function) alleles. The results could improve individualization of citalopram or escitalopram therapy and could also be used for physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling as well as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling.
Authors: Sarah C Sim; Carl Risinger; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Eleni Aklillu; Magnus Christensen; Leif Bertilsson; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Patricia Huezo-Diaz; Nader Perroud; Edgar P Spencer; Rebecca Smith; Sarah Sim; Susanne Virding; Rudolf Uher; Cerisse Gunasinghe; Jo Gray; Desmond Campbell; Joanna Hauser; Wolfgang Maier; Andrej Marusic; Marcella Rietschel; Jorge Perez; Caterina Giovannini; Ole Mors; Julien Mendlewicz; Peter McGuffin; Anne E Farmer; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; Ian W Craig; Katherine J Aitchison Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-04-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey R Bishop; Fedra Najjar; Leah H Rubin; Stephen J Guter; Thomas Owley; Matthew W Mosconi; Suma Jacob; Edwin H Cook Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Anna M Wehry; Laura Ramsey; Shane E Dulemba; Sarah A Mossman; Jeffrey R Strawn Journal: Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care Date: 2018-01-08