Literature DB >> 25154094

Spatially explicit modeling of 1992-2100 land cover and forest stand age for the conterminous United States.

Terry L Sohl, Kristi L Sayler, Michelle A Bouchard, Ryan R Reker, Aaron M Friesz, Stacie L Bennett, Benjamin M Sleeter, Rachel R Sleeter, Tamara Wilson, Chris Soulard, Michelle Knuppe, Travis Van Hofwegen.   

Abstract

Information on future land-use and land-cover (LULC) change is needed to analyze the impact of LULC change on ecological processes. The U.S. Geological Survey has produced spatially explicit, thematically detailed LULC projections for the conterminous United States. Four qualitative and quantitative scenarios of LULC change were developed, with characteristics consistent with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES). The four quantified scenarios (A1B, A2, B1, and B2) served as input to the forecasting scenarios of land-use change (FORE-SCE) model. Four spatially explicit data sets consistent with scenario storylines were produced for the conterminous United States, with annual LULC maps from 1992 through 2100. The future projections are characterized by a loss of natural land covers in most scenarios, with corresponding expansion of anthropogenic land uses. Along with the loss of natural land covers, remaining natural land covers experience increased fragmentation under most scenarios, with only the B2 scenario remaining relatively stable in both the proportion of remaining natural land covers and basic fragmentation measures. Forest stand age was also modeled. By 2100, scenarios and ecoregions with heavy forest cutting had relatively lower mean stand ages compared to those with less forest cutting. Stand ages differed substantially between unprotected and protected forest lands, as well as between different forest classes. The modeled data were compared to the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) and other data sources to assess model characteristics. The consistent, spatially explicit, and thematically detailed LULC projections and the associated forest stand-age data layers have been used to analyze LULC impacts on carbon and greenhouse gas fluxes, biodiversity, climate and weather variability, hydrologic change, and other ecological processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25154094     DOI: 10.1890/13-1245.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  12 in total

1.  Predicting combined effects of land use and climate change on river and stream salinity.

Authors:  John R Olson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Impact of prior and projected climate change on US Lyme disease incidence.

Authors:  Lisa I Couper; Andrew J MacDonald; Erin A Mordecai
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Wilderness areas in a changing landscape: changes in land use, land cover, and climate.

Authors:  Jocelyn L Aycrigg; T Ryan Mccarley; R Travis Belote; Sebastian Martinuzzi
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  Projection of corn production and stover-harvesting impacts on soil organic carbon dynamics in the U.S. Temperate Prairies.

Authors:  Yiping Wu; Shuguang Liu; Claudia J Young; Devendra Dahal; Terry L Sohl; Brian Davis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The relative impacts of climate and land-use change on conterminous United States bird species from 2001 to 2075.

Authors:  Terry L Sohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Paris Agreement on Climate Change: A Booster to Enable Sustainable Global Development and Beyond.

Authors:  Subhash Janardhan Bhore
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Mediterranean California's water use future under multiple scenarios of developed and agricultural land use change.

Authors:  Tamara S Wilson; Benjamin M Sleeter; D Richard Cameron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing threats of non-native species to native freshwater biodiversity: Conservation priorities for the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Panlasigui; Amy J S Davis; Michael J Mangiante; John A Darling
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.990

9.  Single species conservation as an umbrella for management of landscape threats.

Authors:  Claire A Runge; John C Withey; David E Naugle; Joseph E Fargione; Kate J Helmstedt; Ashley E Larsen; Sebastian Martinuzzi; Jason D Tack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.

Authors:  Jesse D Gourevitch; Aura M Alonso-Rodríguez; Natalia Aristizábal; Luz A de Wit; Eva Kinnebrew; Caitlin E Littlefield; Maya Moore; Charles C Nicholson; Aaron J Schwartz; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.