Literature DB >> 25153666

Osseointegrated implants for auricular defects: operative techniques and complication management.

Daniel J Rocke1, Debara L Tucci, Jeffrey Marcus, Jay McClennen, David Kaylie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Auricular defects are challenging to reconstruct with native tissue. We describe operative techniques and complication management for patients undergoing osseointegrated implants for auriculectomy defects and microtia.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients at Duke University Medical Center with auricular defects treated with osseointegrated implants for prosthetic (OIP) auricles from January 1, 2010, until September 16, 2013.
INTERVENTIONS: Osseointegrated implantation for auricular defects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Description of operative techniques, complications, and complication management.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients met inclusion criteria. Five patients had microtia and atresia. Two of these patients had bilateral microtia and atresia and underwent bilateral simultaneous implantation of both OIP and osseointegrated hearing implants (OHIs). Two other microtia/atresia patients underwent simultaneous unilateral OIP and OHI. Eleven patients had unilateral defects from either trauma or skin cancer resection. Three patients received adjuvant radiation before implantation. Complications included tissue overgrowth requiring revision surgery (two patients), inadequate bone stock requiring split calvarial bone graft and later implantation, loss of implant secondary to osteoradionecrosis requiring hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and skin infection requiring antibiotic therapy.
CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of auriculectomy defects and microtia is difficult to accomplish using native tissue. Complications are common, and these complications can have devastating consequences on the final result. Osseointegrated implantation offers an outstanding alternative for reconstructing these defects. We describe our multidisciplinary team approach, examine operative techniques, and focus on the unique challenges of simultaneous and bilateral simultaneous OIP and OHI implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25153666     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  5 in total

Review 1.  Otologic and Audiology Concerns of Microtia Repair.

Authors:  Kausar Ali; Kriti Mohan; Yi-Chun Liu
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Osseointegrated implants for auricular prostheses: An alternative to autologous repair.

Authors:  Marisa A Ryan; Tawfiq Khoury; David M Kaylie; Matthew G Crowson; C Scott Brown; Jay McClennen; Eileen M Raynor
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Refabrication of an implant-retained auricular prosthesis using clip attachment pickup technique.

Authors:  Sanketh Kethireddy; Keerthi Kethireddy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

4.  Shape Optimization of Costal Cartilage Framework Fabrication Based on Finite Element Analysis for Reducing Incidence of Auricular Reconstruction Complications.

Authors:  Jing Zhong; Suijun Chen; Yanyan Zhao; Junfeiyang Yin; Yilin Wang; Haihuan Gong; Xueyuan Zhang; Jiejie Wang; Yaobin Wu; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Hilde Morales-Meléndez; Carlos Pérez-Albacete Martínez; David Morales-Schwarz; Roni Kolerman; Manuel Fernández-Domínguez; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de Val
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.