| Literature DB >> 25153489 |
Clement Kin-Ming Tsui1, Lina Farfan1, Amanda D Roe2, Adrianne V Rice2, Janice E K Cooke2, Yousry A El-Kassaby1, Richard C Hamelin3.
Abstract
Over 18 million ha of forests have been destroyed in the past decade in Canada by the mountain pine beetle (MPB) and its fungal symbionts. Understanding their population dynamics is critical to improving modeling of beetle epidemics and providing potential clues to predict population expansion. Leptographium longiclavatum and Grosmannia clavigera are fungal symbionts of MPB that aid the beetle to colonize and kill their pine hosts. We investigated the genetic structure and demographic expansion of L. longiclavatum in populations established within the historic distribution range and in the newly colonized regions. We identified three genetic clusters/populations that coincide with independent geographic locations. The genetic profiles of the recently established populations in northern British Columbia (BC) and Alberta suggest that they originated from central and southern BC. Approximate Bayesian Computation supports the scenario that this recent expansion represents an admixture of individuals originating from BC and the Rocky Mountains. Highly significant correlations were found among genetic distance matrices of L. longiclavatum, G. clavigera, and MPB. This highlights the concordance of demographic processes in these interacting organisms sharing a highly specialized niche and supports the hypothesis of long-term multipartite beetle-fungus co-evolutionary history and mutualistic relationships.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25153489 PMCID: PMC4143264 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Population structure of Leptographium longiclavatum based on ten microsatellites using STRUCTURE.
Each pie chart represents the average % assignment of fungal isolates (based on membership coefficient) from individuals into each of the three optimal clusters (“BC” by blue, “North” by red, “Rocky” by yellow) in each of the 17 populations.
Summary information of 17 populations of L. longiclavatum, including sampling locations and time, host origin, N (sample size), He (genetic diversity), allelic diversity, % polymorphic loci, and IA (index of association).
| Location | Code | Hosts | Year of isolation | Number of isolates | Number of isolates (clone corrected) | Genetic diversity (He) | Allellic diversity | Percentage of polymorphic loci | IA (index of association) |
|
| BL |
| 2004 | 9 | 8 | 0.424 (0.075) | 2.4 (0.34) | 90% | −0.3 (0.85) |
|
| QUE |
| 2004 | 12 | 11 | 0.401 (0.068) | 2.6 (0.40) | 100% | 0.4 (0.07) |
|
| PG |
| 2004 | 18 | 17 | 0.349 (0.086) | 2.7 (0.616) | 90% | 0.17 (0.13) |
|
| KAM |
| 2004 | 26 | 22 | 0.368 (0.073) | 3.1 (0.526) | 100% | 0.15 (0.82) |
|
| MER |
| 2009 | 15 | 14 | 0.465 (0.064) | 3 (0.447) | 100% | 0.26 (0.1) |
|
| WL |
| 2004 | 22 | 21 | 0.409 (0.086) | 2.7 (0.396) | 80% | 0.5 (0.0067**) |
|
| Val |
| 2007/2008 | 8 | 8 | 0.383 (0.066) | 2.1 (0.18) | 90% | 0.35 (0.11) |
|
| GOL |
| 2004 | 8 | 7 | 0.391 (0.069) | 2.2 (0.327) | 90% | −0.02 (0.46) |
|
| YOH |
| 2007/2008 | 5 | 5 | 0.349 (0.019) | 1.7 (0.26) | 50% | 0.07 (0.47) |
|
| CAN |
| 2007/2008 | 12 | 11 | 0.332 (0.079) | 2.5 (0.522) | 90% | −0.23 (0.79) |
|
| SPA |
| 2007/2008 | 6 | 6 | 0.291 (0.101) | 1.8 (0.327) | 50% | −0.21 (0.8) |
|
| CRP |
| 2007/2008 | 5 | 5 | 0.391 (0.096) | 2.1 (0.314) | 70% | −0.27 (0.34) |
|
| FAR |
| 2007/2008 | 15 | 14 | 0.276 (0.065) | 2.4 (0.427) | 90% | 0.07 (0.34) |
|
| FCR |
| 2007/2008 | 17 | 15 | 0.276 (0.065) | 1.9 (0.277) | 70% | 0.33 (0.05 |
|
| TUR |
| 2007/2008 | 21 | 17 | 0.306 (0.067) | 2.3 (0.335) | 90% | 0.08 (0.26) |
|
| GRP |
| 2007/2008 | 23 | 20 | 0.286 (0.073) | 2.2 (0.249) | 90% | 0.33 (0.04 |
|
| KAK |
| 2007/2008 | 19 | 17 | 0.336 (0.081) | 2.5 (0.543) | 80% | 0.185 (0.14) |
|
| 241 | 218 | 0.323 (0.018) | 2.365 (0.096) | 0.1 (0.01 |
The null hypothesis of random association of alleles in random mating (IA = 0) was tested by comparing the observed value of the statistic with that obtained after 500 randomization to simulate distribution (* p value <0.05; ** p value <0.01).
*used in manuscript text and figures.
Summary of F and heterozygosity (H) from each locus in L. longiclavatum populations (clone corrected data, n = 218).
| Locus | Alleles per locus |
|
| |
| Mean | SE | |||
| SR7 | 13 | 0.153 | 0.746 | 0.026 |
| SR14 | 4 | 0.181 | 0.178 | 0.045 |
| SR16 | 2 | 0.188 | 0.382 | 0.033 |
| SR24 | 4 | 0.199 | 0.417 | 0.055 |
| SR36 | 3 | 0.118 | 0.242 | 0.044 |
| SR45 | 6 | 0.265 | 0.262 | 0.064 |
| SR47 | 4 | 0.219 | 0.433 | 0.032 |
| SR52 | 3 | 0.146 | 0.149 | 0.040 |
| SR53 | 6 | 0.380 | 0.383 | 0.059 |
| SR57 | 3 | 0.308 | 0.315 | 0.036 |
| Overall mean | 0.195 | 0.302 | 0.017 | |
| SE | 0.020 |
Figure 2Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) among 17 Leptographium longiclavatum populations based on Nei's genetic distance using GenAlEx (cluster “BC” by blue, “North” by red, “Rocky” by yellow).
The first and second accounted for 37% and 22.2% of the variance, respectively.
Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) for Leptographium longiclavatum populations based on (i) sampling locations and (ii) three genetic clusters pooled according to the PCoA and STRUCTURE (Degrees of freedom (df), sum of squares (SS), variance estimates, percentages of total variation (%) contributed by populations, clusters and individual isolates within populations are shown).
| (i) | df | SS | Variance | % |
|
| Among all 17 populations | 16 | 157.325 | 0.309 | 13.42 | <0.001 |
| Within each of 17 populations | 419 | 835.895 | 1.995 | 86.58 | <0.001 |
| Total | 435 | 993.22 | 2.304 | 100 | |
| (ii) | |||||
| Among 3 Clusters | 2 | 68.242 | 0.1987 | 8.39 | <0.001 |
| Among populations within 3 clusters | 14 | 89.082 | 0.1734 | 7.32 | <0.001 |
| Within 17 populations | 419 | 835.895 | 1.995 | 84.28 | <0.001 |
| Total | 435 | 993.22 | 2.3670 | 100 |
Figure 3Diagram showing potential gene flow among three clusters and the movement and demographic expansion pattern of L. longiclavatum inferred from DIYABC.
Solid lines indicate there is no significant difference between the FST values of two locations, suggesting gene flow between them (only connections among clusters are shown; refer to Table S4 for FST differentiation/connections among locations within each cluster).
Results of individual assignment from GENECLASS.
| Location | # Sample | # Assigned home | % Home | % Cluster | Ratio |
|
| 8 | 4 | 50.00 | 100.00 |
|
|
| 11 | 4 | 36.36 | 100.00 | 1.48 |
|
| 17 | 1 | 5.88 | 100.00 | 1 |
|
| 22 | 10 | 45.45 | 95.45 |
|
|
| 14 | 9 | 64.29 | 100.00 |
|
|
| 21 | 8 | 38.10 | 100.00 |
|
|
| 8 | 1 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 0.13 |
|
| 7 | 0 | 0.00 | 14.29 | 0 |
|
| 5 | 4 | 80.00 | 80.00 | 1.4 |
|
| 11 | 4 | 36.36 | 45.45 | 0.5 |
|
| 6 | 2 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0.1 |
|
| 5 | 2 | 40.00 | 40.00 | 0.09 |
|
| 14 | 3 | 21.43 | 28.57 | 0.64 |
|
| 15 | 0 | 0.00 | 26.67 | 0 |
|
| 17 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.53 | 0 |
|
| 20 | 0 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 0 |
|
| 17 | 0 | 0.00 | 11.76 | 1 |
Number of individuals assigned to original sampling location (correct assignment).
Assignment rate to original location ( = Nhome /N).
Assignment rate to the genetic cluster recognized from STRUCTURE.
Ratio = total number of individuals (out of 218) assigned to the location / sample size of the location (N).
Comparison of observed gene diversity (H) with expected gene diversity (HEQ) at mutation-drift equilibrium calculated from the observed number of alleles under the IAM, SMM and TPM for the 17 populations.
| D/E | |||||||
| IAM | TPM | SMM | p | mode | |||
|
| 3/7 | 4/6 | 8/2 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.08 | normal |
|
| 2/7** | 2/7** | 2/7 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.25 | shifted |
|
| 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 0.3 | 0.57 | 0.82 | normal |
|
| 4/6 | 4/6 | 4/6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | shifted |
|
| 5/5 | 5/5 | 7/3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | normal |
|
| 1/9** | 2/8 | 4/6 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.375 | normal |
|
| 1/7 | 2/6 | 3/5 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.46 | normal |
|
| 4/6 | 5/5 | 6/4 | 0.23 | 0.4 | 0.2 | normal |
|
| 3/6 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | shifted |
|
| 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | shifted |
|
| 0/5 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.2 | shifted |
|
| 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 0.49 | 0.6 | 1 | normal |
|
| 0/7** | 2/5 | 2/5 | 0.008 | 0.03 | 0.07 | shifted |
|
| 3/6 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.4 | shifted |
|
| 4/6 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0.37 | 1 | 0.3 | normal |
|
| 3/6 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 0.4 | 1 | 1 | normal |
|
| 4/5 | 8/1 | 8/1** | 1 | 0.02 | 0.01 | normal |
|
| ¾ | 3/4 | 3/4 | 0.11 | 0.4 | 0.2 | shifted |
|
| 5/4 | 5/4 | 6/3 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.9 | normal |
|
| 1/7 | 1/7 | 2/6 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.6 | normal |
IAM, infinite allele model; SMM, stepwise mutation model;
TPM, two-phase mutation models.
D / E is the number of loci showing a deficit / excess of gene diversity. Significance estimates of excess or deficiency across loci were obtained using the one-tailed Wilcoxon test and the sign test.
*P≤0.05, **P≤0.01.
Model choice and robustness on model choice for discrimination among three scenarios (SC).
| SC1 (BC > Rocky > Epidemic) | SC2 (Rocky > BC > Epidemic) | SC3 (BC + Rocky > Epidemic) | |
| Posterior probability | 0.2077 [0.2015–0.2140] | 0.3652 [0.3574–0.3731] | 0.4270 [0.4195–0.4345] |
|
| |||
|
| 0.78 | 0.052 | 0.294** |
|
| 0.042 | 0.738 | 0.262** |
|
| 0.178 | 0.21 | 0.444 |
*Type I error, **Type II error.
Congruence among genetic distance matrices of two fungi, the mountain pine beetles and geographic distance among sampling locations using CADM implemented in the R framework.
| Global congruence |
| |||
|
| 0.7975 | |||
|
| 287.1177*** | |||
|
| Ho: matrix is incongruent with remaining matrices | |||
| H1: matrix is congruent with at least one other matrix | ||||
| MPB |
|
| Geographic distance | |
|
| 0.7368 | 0.7473 | 0.7040 | 0.7322 |
|
| *** | *** | *** | *** |
|
| MPB |
|
| Geographic distance |
|
| 1 | 0.7248*** | 0.6749*** | 0.8107*** |
|
| 1 | 0.7840*** | 0.7330*** | |
|
| 1 | 0.6528*** | ||
|
| 1 | |||