BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass develop anti-protamine antibodies, with or without the association of thromboembolic events. METHODS: We extensively investigated the serological features of protamine antibodies, which developed in six patients who were clinically suspected to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Three patients had thrombotic events. Sera were tested by four different commercially available immunoassays, a heparin-platelet aggregation test, and for their binding properties to heparin, platelet factor 4 (PF4), complex heparin-PF4, protamine, and protamine complex with heparin. Sera from four patients were also tested for the capability to induce platelet activation and the formation of platelet-monocyte heterotypic aggregates. RESULTS: The ELISA assay Zymutest HIA was strongly positive in all cases, the HPIA Asserachrome was borderline, and the gel centrifugation test PaDGIA was positive in two tested patients. Platelet aggregation tests were negative. Using a variation of the Zymutest HIA we demonstrate that IgG antibodies bound only to protamine or protamine complex with heparin, but not to heparin or PF4 only. Sera-induced platelet P-selectin expression and the formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates. Blood samples from one patient proofed positive concomitantly with the thromboembolic event. However, serological characteristics did not differ between antibodies associated with thromboembolic events from those without. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that protamine-induced antibodies are specific and may induce platelet activation, which explains their association with thromboembolic events.
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass develop anti-protamine antibodies, with or without the association of thromboembolic events. METHODS: We extensively investigated the serological features of protamine antibodies, which developed in six patients who were clinically suspected to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Three patients had thrombotic events. Sera were tested by four different commercially available immunoassays, a heparin-platelet aggregation test, and for their binding properties to heparin, platelet factor 4 (PF4), complex heparin-PF4, protamine, and protamine complex with heparin. Sera from four patients were also tested for the capability to induce platelet activation and the formation of platelet-monocyte heterotypic aggregates. RESULTS: The ELISA assay Zymutest HIA was strongly positive in all cases, the HPIA Asserachrome was borderline, and the gel centrifugation test PaDGIA was positive in two tested patients. Platelet aggregation tests were negative. Using a variation of the Zymutest HIA we demonstrate that IgG antibodies bound only to protamine or protamine complex with heparin, but not to heparin or PF4 only. Sera-induced platelet P-selectin expression and the formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates. Blood samples from one patient proofed positive concomitantly with the thromboembolic event. However, serological characteristics did not differ between antibodies associated with thromboembolic events from those without. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that protamine-induced antibodies are specific and may induce platelet activation, which explains their association with thromboembolic events.