The highly selective palladium-catalyzed Negishi coupling of secondary alkylzinc reagents with heteroaryl halides is described. The development of a series of biarylphosphine ligands has led to the identification of an improved catalyst for the coupling of electron-deficient heterocyclic substrates. Preparation and characterization of oxidative addition complex (L)(Ar)PdBr provided insight into the unique reactivity of catalysts based on CPhos-type ligands in facilitating challenging reductive elimination processes.
The highly selective palladium-catalyzed Negishi coupling of secondary alkylzinc reagents with heteroaryl halides is described. The development of a series of biarylphosphine ligands has led to the identification of an improved catalyst for the coupling of electron-deficient heterocyclic substrates. Preparation and characterization of oxidative addition complex (L)(Ar)PdBr provided insight into the unique reactivity of catalysts based on CPhos-type ligands in facilitating challenging reductive elimination processes.
Aromatic compounds bearing one
or multiple alkyl components represent ubiquitous structural motifs
among pharmaceuticals and natural products.[1] Consequently, extensive efforts have been devoted to the rapid and
direct construction of sp2–sp3carbon–carbon
bonds in both industrial and academic settings. One of the most frequently
practiced methods to form sp2–sp3carbon–carbon
bonds relies on transition-metal-catalyzed coupling reactions.[2] However, the cross-coupling involving secondary alkyl nucleophiles remains challenging, owing
to the competitive β-hydride elimination and migratory reinsertion
that results in the formation of undesired isomerized products (5) (Scheme 1). To overcome this challenge,
the development of catalyst systems to facilitate reductive elimination
while suppressing competitive β-hydride elimination is of central
importance. Since the pioneering work of Kumada and Hayashi[3] in the area of Ni- and Pd-catalyzed selective
cross-coupling of secondary alkyl nucleophiles, several key advances
have been achieved in the past decade.[4−8] In 2009, our group described a catalyst system based on a diakylbiarylphosphine
ligand (CPhos, L1), which allowed for the coupling of
secondary alkylzinc reagents with aryl bromides and activated aryl
chlorides to deliver a range of coupling products with good selectivity.[4] Organ also developed a well-engineered NHC-based
PEPPSI precatalyst (Pd-PEPPSI-IPentCl), enabling the selective
preparation of functionalized arenes bearing secondary alkyl substituents.[5]
Scheme 1
Major Side Reactions Associated with Pd-Catalyzed
Cross-Coupling
Involving Secondary Alkyl Nucleophiles
Despite these advances, significant challenges
still remain. While
the coupling of relatively simple aromatic substrates and secondary
alkyl nucleophiles can be accomplished with good regioisomeric retention,
efforts to combine heteroaryl electrophiles with secondary alkyl organometallic
reagents have been met with considerably less success. Because of
the altered electronic properties of heterocylic compounds, poor selectivity
for the desired coupling products (4) is usually obtained.
In addition, the presence of heteroatoms capable of coordinating to
the Pd center can lead to catalyst inhibition and deactivation, thereby
rendering the coupling of these heterocycles particularly challenging.[9] Given the importance of heterocyclic compounds
in medicinal chemistry and materials science,[10] a general, practical, and selective protocol for the coupling of
heteroaryl halides with secondary alkyl nucleophiles is highly desirable.
Herein we report our efforts in catalyst development for such coupling
reactions. With these monodentate biarylphosphine-based catalysts,
a diverse array of heteroaryl halides, including those that were unsuccessful
substrates with our previously reported catalyst system, can be combined
with secondary alkylzinc reagents with high levels of regiochemical
fidelity.Our initial studies focused on the coupling of various
types of
heteroaryl halides with isopropylzinc bromide prepared using Knochel’s
procedure (Scheme 2).[11] It was found that through the use of our easily activated palladacycle
precatalyst[12] (11) ligated
by CPhos[13] (L1), a wide range
of heteroaryl halides, including 3-chlorobenzosisothiazole (10a), 4-chloroquinazoline (10b), 4- and 5-halopyrimidine
(10c and 10d), and 3-bromobenzothiazole
(10e) could be effectively transformed in good yields
with high level of selectivity. The coupling of 5-chlorobenzothiazole
(10f) proved to be more difficult with this catalyst
system, and we found that the addition of 1 equiv of LiCl allowed
these processes to occur with excellent yields.[14] Finally, nitrogen heterocycles with unprotected NH groups
such as 5-bromoindole (10g), 5-bromo-7-azaindole (10h), and 6-bromoindazole (10i) also represented
compatible substrates under our conditions.
Scheme 2
Cross-Coupling of
Heteroaryl Halides with Isopropylzinc Bromide
Reaction
conditions: HetAr-X
(1.0 mmol), i-PrZnBr·LiCl (1.3 mmol), 0 °C
to rt, 1–12 h. Yields are isolated yields on average of two
runs.
1 equiv of LiCl
was used; THF was used as the sole solvent; 2 mol % of 15 and 2 mol % of L1 was used.
2.3 equiv of iPrZnBr·LiCl was used. n = normal
product, r = rearranged product. n/r ratio was determined by GC and/or 1H NMR spectroscopy analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
Cross-Coupling of
Heteroaryl Halides with Isopropylzinc Bromide
Reaction
conditions: HetAr-X
(1.0 mmol), i-PrZnBr·LiCl (1.3 mmol), 0 °C
to rt, 1–12 h. Yields are isolated yields on average of two
runs.1 equiv of LiCl
was used; THF was used as the sole solvent; 2 mol % of 15 and 2 mol % of L1 was used.2.3 equiv of iPrZnBr·LiCl was used. n = normal
product, r = rearranged product. n/rratio was determined by GC and/or1H NMR spectroscopy analysis of the crude reaction mixture.The catalyst derived from CPhos (L1) was not effective
with electron-deficient six-membered nitrogen heterocycles. For example,
using the CPhos-based catalyst, Negishi coupling of 2-bromopyrimidine
(12) and isopropylzinc bromide (9) furnished
a 75:25 mixture of 2-isopropylpyrimidine (13a) and 2-propylpyrimidine
(13b) as determined by GC analysis (Scheme 3). To overcome this limitation, we set out to further facilitate
the reductive elimination process by preparing and examining a new
series of biarylphosphine ligands (L2–L13). We decided to preserve the biaryl framework of CPhos as a key
design element for creating more effective ligands, as mechanistic
studies suggested that the dimethylamino (Me2N-) groups
present in the CPhos biaryl backbone are critical to accelerate reductive
elimination and discourage β-hydride elimination (vide infra).
Since electron-deficient ligands have been demonstrated to accelerate
the reductive elimination step,[15] we prepared
ligands L2–L7 wherein the cyclohexyl
groups on the phosphine were replaced with less electron-donating
aryl groups. Indeed, a catalyst composed of L3 (PhCPhos)
furnished improved selectivity than the original L1-based
catalyst, as demonstrated by a 10-fold increase in the 13a/13bratio. However, adding additional electron-withdrawing
substituents to the P-bound Ar- groups did not provide improved results
(L6), and the L5-based catalyst bearing
P-bound 3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxyphenyl groups exhibited the best selectivity
for the nonrearranged product. We next replaced the P-bound cyclohexyl
group in L1 by other alkyl groups. Eventually, L10 (EtCPhos) possessing two less electron-donating P-bound
ethyl substituents[16] was identified to
as the most effective ligand for this transformation.
Scheme 3
Ligand
Effect on the Coupling of 2-Bromopyrimidine and i-PrZnBr·LiCl,
Catalyst
derived from L12 afforded 15% conversion after 2 h.
Only 30% conversion was achieved
in the absence of phosphine
ligands; no reaction in the absence of Pd(OAc)2. 13a/13b ratio was determined by GC analysis of
the crude reaction mixture.
Ligand
Effect on the Coupling of 2-Bromopyrimidine and i-PrZnBr·LiCl,
Catalyst
derived from L12 afforded 15% conversion after 2 h.Only 30% conversion was achieved
in the absence of phosphine
ligands; no reaction in the absence of Pd(OAc)2. 13a/13bratio was determined by GC analysis of
the crude reaction mixture.With the new set
of reaction conditions in hand, we set out to
explore the substrate scope of electron-deficient six-membered nitrogen
heterocycles (Scheme 4). It was found that
the catalyst based on EtCPhos (L10) accommodated a wide
variety of nitrogen heterocycles including 2-chloropyridine (15a), 2-chloroquinoline (15b), 2-chloropyrazine
(15c), 2-chloroquinoxaline (15d), 3-chloropyridazine
(15e), delivering the corresponding coupling products
in excellent yields. Moreover, in most cases (15a–e), improved selectivity for the nonrearranged product was
achieved as compared with the L1-based catalyst that
we previously developed.
Scheme 4
Cross-Coupling of Electron-Deficient Six-Membered
Heteroaryl Halides
with Isopropylzinc Bromide
Reaction conditions:
HetAr-X
(1.0 mmol), i-PrZnBr·LiCl (1.3 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (1 mol %), L10 (2 mol %), 0 °C to rt, 12
h. n = normal product, r = rearranged product. n/r ratio was determined
by GC or 1H NMR spectroscopy analysis of the crude reaction
mixture. Yields are isolated yields on average of two runs. In most
cases, the rearranged product and the nonrearranged product are chromatographically
inseparable.
Cross-Coupling of Electron-Deficient Six-Membered
Heteroaryl Halides
with Isopropylzinc Bromide
Reaction conditions:
HetAr-X
(1.0 mmol), i-PrZnBr·LiCl (1.3 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (1 mol %), L10 (2 mol %), 0 °C to rt, 12
h. n = normal product, r = rearranged product. n/rratio was determined
by GC or1H NMR spectroscopy analysis of the crude reaction
mixture. Yields are isolated yields on average of two runs. In most
cases, the rearranged product and the nonrearranged product are chromatographically
inseparable.To further demonstrate the utility
of catalysts based on CPhos-type
ligands, a series of secondary alkylzinc halides were prepared and
coupled with a wide range of heteroaryl halides (Scheme 5). Coupling of acyclic secondary alkylzinc halides proceeded
with excellent selectivity for the desired product (18a–c). Notably, rearrangement of the alkyl content
was not observed during the coupling event when benzylzinc reagents
(18d) and cyclic alkylzinc reagents (18e and 18f) were used. Other cyclic secondary alkylzinc
reagents ranging from cyclopropyl to cyclohexylzinc halides (18g–i) could also be effectively coupled.
We note, however, that haloimidazoles afforded low yields under the
current reaction conditions due to the competitive reduction of these
heteroaromatic substrates.
Scheme 5
Substrate Scope of Secondary Alkylzinc Reagents
Reaction conditions: HetAr-X
(1.0 mmol), sec-alkylZnBr·LiCl (1.3 mmol), 15 (1 mol %), L1 (1 mol %), 0 °C to rt,
2 h. a. 60 °C. n = normal product, r = rearranged product. n/r
ratio was determined by GC and/or 1H NMR analysis of the
crude reaction mixture.
Substrate Scope of Secondary Alkylzinc Reagents
Reaction conditions: HetAr-X
(1.0 mmol), sec-alkylZnBr·LiCl (1.3 mmol), 15 (1 mol %), L1 (1 mol %), 0 °C to rt,
2 h. a. 60 °C. n = normal product, r = rearranged product. n/rratio was determined by GC and/or1H NMR analysis of the
crude reaction mixture.To gain further insight
into the unique reactivity of Pd-based
catalyst system featuring CPhos-type ligands, we prepared oxidative
addition complex [L1·ArPdBr] (Ar = 4-cyanophenyl)
(20) as an air-stable bright yellow solid by treating
(COD)Pd(CH2TMS)2 with 4-bromobenzonitrile and L1 in THF (Scheme 6). Reaction of methyl
4-chlorobenzoate and isopropylzinc bromide employing catalytic amount
(1 mol %) of 20 afforded the same mixture of rearranged
and nonrearranged products (45:1) as when palladacycle precatalyst 11 was used, demonstrating the catalytic competence of 20 for the coupling of secondary alkylzinc halides. Single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 1) of 20 revealed a nearly square-planarPd(II) center featuring
κ2 bound CPhos ligand through P atom and ipso-C moiety of the bottom aromatic ring (ipso-C–Pd bond length = 2.478(3) Å). The solid-state structure
of 20 indicates that neither of the dimethylamino substituents
of L1 coordinates to the Pd(II) center, indicating the
monodentate nature of L1. Further examination of 20 suggests that neither of the dimethylamino groups lies
in the plane of the bottom ring of L1, with the dihedral
angles C38–N1–C32–C31 and C40–N2–C36–C31
being 39.12° and 82.24°, respectively. This observation
is suggestive that the lone pair of the Me2N- group is
not in conjugation with the lowerring of L1 and the
Me2N groups presented in the ligand biaryl backbone could
likely serve as electron-withdrawing substituents, thereby rendering
the bottom ring of the phosphine less electron-donating. In light
of this effect, we believe that the use of CPhos-type ligands may
facilitate reductive elimination and carefully balancing the electron-donating
ability of P-bound substituents and the biaryl backbone is critical
to the success of selective coupling of secondary alkyl nucleophiles.
Scheme 6
Synthesis of Oxidative Addition Complex 20
Figure 1
ORTEP representation drawing of oxidative
addition complex 20. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity;
thermal ellipsoids
set at 50% probability.
ORTEP representation drawing of oxidative
addition complex 20. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity;
thermal ellipsoids
set at 50% probability.In summary,
we have developed general catalyst systems allowing
for the highly selective cross-coupling of secondary alkylzinc reagents
and heteroaryl halides under mild conditions. Our protocol is effective
with a broad spectrum of heteroaryl halides, delivering an array of
complex heterocycles possessing secondary alkyl substituents that
are frequently found in biologically active compounds. Furthermore,
design and evaluation of a series of biarylphosphine ligands bearing
a 2,6-bis(dimethylamino)phenyl group proximal to the phosphine have
led to a new catalyst that demonstrated superior selectivity for the
coupling of electron-deficient heteroaryl halides. Application of
these newly developed catalysts in cross-coupling reactions where
transmetalation orreductive elimination remains challenging is topic
of onging investigation in our laboratory.
Authors: Cory Valente; Selçuk Calimsiz; Ka Hou Hoi; Debasis Mallik; Mahmoud Sayah; Michael G Organ Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Tobias Thaler; Benjamin Haag; Andrei Gavryushin; Katrin Schober; Evelyn Hartmann; Ruth M Gschwind; Hendrik Zipse; Peter Mayer; Paul Knochel Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2010-01-17 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Nathaniel H Park; Ekaterina V Vinogradova; David S Surry; Stephen L Buchwald Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 15.336