Literature DB >> 25153157

Coronary artery calcification scoring with state-of-the-art CT scanners from different vendors has substantial effect on risk classification.

Martin J Willemink1, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Richard A P Takx, Tim Leiner, Ricardo P J Budde, Ronald L A W Bleys, Marco Das, Joachim E Wildberger, Mathias Prokop, Nico Buls, Johan de Mey, Arnold M R Schilham, Pim A de Jong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the intervendor variability of Agatston scoring determined with state-of-the-art computed tomographic (CT) systems from the four major vendors in an ex vivo setup and to simulate the subsequent effects on cardiovascular risk reclassification in a large population-based cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research ethics board approval was not necessary because cadaveric hearts from individuals who donated their bodies to science were used. Agatston scores obtained with CT scanners from four different vendors were compared. Fifteen ex vivo human hearts were placed in a phantom resembling an average human adult. Hearts were scanned at equal radiation dose settings for the systems of all four vendors. Agatston scores were quantified semiautomatically with software used clinically. The ex vivo Agatston scores were used to simulate the effects of different CT scanners on reclassification of 432 individuals aged 55 years or older from a population-based study who were at intermediate cardiovascular risk based on Framingham risk scores. The Friedman test was used to evaluate overall differences, and post hoc analyses were performed by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction.
RESULTS: Agatston scores differed substantially when CT scanners from different vendors were used, with median Agatston scores ranging from 332 (interquartile range, 114-1135) to 469 (interquartile range, 183-1381; P < .05). Simulation showed that these differences resulted in a change in cardiovascular risk classification in 0.5%-6.5% of individuals at intermediate risk when a CT scanner from a different vendor was used.
CONCLUSION: Among individuals at intermediate cardiovascular risk, state-of the-art CT scanners made by different vendors produced substantially different Agatston scores, which can result in reclassification of patients to the high- or low-risk categories in up to 6.5% of cases. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25153157     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.

Authors:  Bálint Szilveszter; Hesham Elzomor; Mihály Károlyi; Márton Kolossváry; Rolf Raaijmakers; Kálmán Benke; Csilla Celeng; Andrea Bartykowszki; Zsolt Bagyura; Árpád Lux; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Coronary CT Angiography: Variability of CT Scanners and Readers in Measurement of Plaque Volume.

Authors:  Rolf Symons; Justin Z Morris; Colin O Wu; Amir Pourmorteza; Mark A Ahlman; João A C Lima; Marcus Y Chen; Marissa Mallek; Veit Sandfort; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Influence of iterative reconstruction on coronary calcium scores at multiple heart rates: a multivendor phantom study on state-of-the-art CT systems.

Authors:  N R van der Werf; M J Willemink; T P Willems; M J W Greuter; T Leiner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Influence of heart rate on coronary calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer phantom study.

Authors:  N R van der Werf; M J Willemink; T P Willems; R Vliegenthart; M J W Greuter; T Leiner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Georg Apfaltrer; Moritz H Albrecht; U Joseph Schoepf; Taylor M Duguay; Carlo N De Cecco; John W Nance; Domenico De Santis; Paul Apfaltrer; Marwen H Eid; Chelsea D Eason; Zachary M Thompson; Maximilian J Bauer; Akos Varga-Szemes; Brian E Jacobs; Erich Sorantin; Christian Tesche
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.

Authors:  Andrew D Choi; Eric S Leifer; Jeannie Yu; Sujata M Shanbhag; Kathie Bronson; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-07-27

7.  Performance of visual, manual, and automatic coronary calcium scoring of cardiac 13N-ammonia PET/low dose CT.

Authors:  Magdalena M Dobrolinska; Sergiy V Lazarenko; Friso M van der Zant; Lonneke Does; Niels van der Werf; Niek H J Prakken; Marcel J W Greuter; Riemer H J A Slart; Remco J J Knol
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Plaque assessment by coronary CT.

Authors:  Bálint Szilveszter; Csilla Celeng; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Iterative reconstruction can permit the use of lower X-ray tube current in CT coronary artery calcium scoring.

Authors:  Mark A Rodrigues; Michelle C Williams; Thomas Fitzgerald; Martin Connell; Nicholas W Weir; David E Newby; Edwin J R van Beek; Saeed Mirsadraee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Total coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden is associated with myocardial ischemia in non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ingeborg Eskerud; Eva Gerdts; Terje H Larsen; Judit Simon; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Mai Tone Lønnebakken
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.