Literature DB >> 25153005

Influence of the implant drill design and sequence on temperature changes during site preparation.

Gianpaolo Sannino, Paolo Capparé, Enrico F Gherlone, Alberto Barlattani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare bone temperature changes during implant drilling with two drill designs employed in three different drilling sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two implant drill designs and three drilling sequences were evaluated in vitro using artificial bone cylinders. The evaluated drills were different only in the cutting-surface length (control, 16 mm; test, 4 mm). Three drilling sequences (control A, test B1, and test B2) were evaluated with and without irrigation. Temperatures were measured with thermocouple technology. The temperature changes generated by the final drill of each sequence were recorded as the experimental results and were subjected to the Student t test.
RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in temperature changes when comparing the control group A with the test groups B1 (P = .001) and B2 (P = .01) during drilling without coolant. The mean temperature changes were 12.4°C, 6.5°C, and 13.7°C for groups A, B1, and B2, respectively. The Student t test showed statistically significant differences between temperature changes of the control group A and the test groups B1 (P < .01) and B2 (P < .05) during drilling with coolant. The mean temperature changes were 0.9°C, 0.7°C, and 1.9°C for groups A, B1, and B2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Reduction in length of the cutting surface of the drill may limit frictional heat. Drills with the same length of cutting surface may induce lower bone temperature changes, when considering a preliminary drilling step with a pilot drill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25153005     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  The effects of irrigation volume to the heat generation during implant surgery.

Authors:  A Sindel; Ö Dereci; M Hatipoğlu; M-A Altay; Ö Özalp; A Öztürk
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

2.  Use of elevator instruments when luxating and extracting teeth in dentistry: clinical techniques.

Authors:  John Mamoun
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-28

3.  In Vitro Study on Bone Heating during Drilling of the Implant Site: Material, Design and Wear of the Surgical Drill.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Bernabeu-Mira; Hilario Pellicer-Chover; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Healing at sites prepared using different drilling protocols. An experimental study in the tibiae of sheep.

Authors:  Vittorio Favero; Shigeru Sakuma; Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman; Guillermo Alejandro Benedetto; Franco Bengazi; Daniele Botticelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills.

Authors:  Gaetano Marenzi; Josè Camilla Sammartino; Fabio Scherillo; Carlo Rengo; Alfredo De Rosa; Vincenzo Graziano; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  An experimental comparative study of drilling efficiency and temperature elevation with unmodified and modified medical drills in pig tibia bone.

Authors:  Makoto Enokida; Haruhisa Kanaya; Kazutake Uehara; Masaru Ueki; Hideki Nagashima
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-08-02

7.  Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone.

Authors:  Luca Lamazza; Girolamo Garreffa; Domenica Laurito; Marco Lollobrigida; Luigi Palmieri; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.