Literature DB >> 25152599

Living donor liver transplantation does not increase tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to deceased donor transplantation.

Guang-Qin Xiao1, Jiu-Lin Song1, Shu Shen1, Jia-Yin Yang1, Lu-Nan Yan1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).
METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data from 408 liver cancer patients from February 1999 to September 2012. We used the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test to analyze the characteristics of LDLT and DDLT. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the RFS and OS in HCC.
RESULTS: Three hundred sixty HBV-positive patients (276 DDLT and 84 LDLT) were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 27.1 mo (range 1.1-130.8 mo). One hundred eighty-five (51.2%) patients died during follow-up. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates for LDLT were 85.2%, 55.7%, and 52.9%, respectively; for DDLT, the RFS rates were 73.2%, 49.1%, and 45.3% (P = 0.115). The OS rates were similar between the LDLT and DDLT recipients, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 81.8%, 49.5%, and 43.0% vs 69.5%, 43.0%, and 38.3%, respectively (P = 0.30). The outcomes of HCC according to the Milan criteria after LDLT and DDLT were not significantly different (for LDLT: 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS: 94.7%, 78.7%, and 78.7% vs 89.2%, 77.5%, and 74.5%, P = 0.50; for DDLT: 86.1%, 68.8%, and 68.8% vs 80.5%, 62.2%, and 59.8% P = 0.53).
CONCLUSION: The outcomes of LDLT for HCC are not worse compared to the outcomes of DDLT. LDLT does not increase tumor recurrence of HCC compared to DDLT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deceased donor; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplantation; Living donor

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25152599      PMCID: PMC4138476          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  36 in total

1.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the proposed UCSF criteria with the Milan criteria and the Pittsburgh modified TNM criteria.

Authors:  Francis Y Yao; Linda Ferrell; Nathan M Bass; Peter Bacchetti; Nancy L Ascher; John P Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son.

Authors:  R W Strong; S V Lynch; T H Ong; H Matsunami; Y Koido; G A Balderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  [Problems of surgical anatomy and surgical practice studied with a view to transplantation of sections of the liver in humans].

Authors:  A Dagradi; P F Munari; A Gamba; M Zannini; P L Sussi; G Serio
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  1966-08

4.  Segmental liver transplantation from a living donor.

Authors:  B Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Modified techniques for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Lu-Nan Yan; Bo Li; Yong Zeng; Tian-Fu Wen; Ji-Chun Zhao; Wen-Tao Wang; Jia-Yin Yang; Ming-Qing Xu; Yu-Kui Ma; Zhe-Yu Chen; Jiang-Wen Liu; Hong Wu
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2006-05

6.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list.

Authors:  Francis Y Yao; Nathan M Bass; Bev Nikolai; Timothy J Davern; Robert Kerlan; Victor Wu; Nancy L Ascher; John P Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Graft and patient survival after adult live donor liver transplantation compared to a matched cohort who received a deceased donor transplantation.

Authors:  Paul J Thuluvath; Hwan Y Yoo
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C-related cirrhosis: no difference in histological recurrence when compared to deceased donor liver transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Linsheng Guo; Mauricio Orrego; Hector Rodriguez-Luna; Vijiyan Balan; Thomas Byrne; Kapil Chopra; David D Douglas; Edwyn Harrison; Adyr Moss; K Sudhakar Reddy; James W Williams; Jorge Rakela; David Mulligan; Hugo E Vargas
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Partial hepatectomy accelerates local tumor growth: potential roles of local cytokine activation.

Authors:  A Picardo; H M Karpoff; B Ng; J Lee; M F Brennan; Y Fong
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  V Mazzaferro; E Regalia; R Doci; S Andreola; A Pulvirenti; F Bozzetti; F Montalto; M Ammatuna; A Morabito; L Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we?

Authors:  Roberto Mazzanti; Umberto Arena; Renato Tassi
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2016-02-20

Review 2.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma from living-donor vs. deceased donor.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 3.  Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: an (almost) exclusive Eastern procedure?

Authors:  Rafael S Pinheiro; Daniel R Waisberg; Lucas S Nacif; Vinicius Rocha-Santos; Rubens M Arantes; Liliana Ducatti; Rodrigo B Martino; Quirino Lai; Wellington Andraus; Luiz A C D'Albuquerque
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-29

Review 4.  Impact of non-oncological factors on tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Xiang-Qian Gu; Wei-Ping Zheng; Da-Hong Teng; Ji-San Sun; Hong Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Combination of 5-fluorouracil and 2-morphilino-8-phenyl-4H-chromen-4-one may inhibit liver cancer stem cell activity.

Authors:  Yu-Chong Peng; Shi-Dong Lu; Jian-Hong Zhong; Zhi-Bo Xie; Xue-Mei You; Ning-Fu Peng; Le-Qun Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-17

Review 6.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and novel surgical approaches.

Authors:  Gonzalo Sapisochin; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Increased Surgical Complications but Improved Overall Survival with Adult Living Donor Compared to Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Jian-Guo Qiu; Yang Cai; Luo Cheng; Cheng-You Du
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.