| Literature DB >> 25152568 |
Luciana Gabriel Nogueira1, Ronaldo Honorato Barros Santos2, Alfredo Inácio Fiorelli2, Eliane Conti Mairena1, Luiz Alberto Benvenuti3, Edimar Alcides Bocchi4, Noedir Antonio Stolf2, Jorge Kalil1, Edecio Cunha-Neto1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy (CCC), a late consequence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection, is an inflammatory cardiomyopathy with prognosis worse than those of noninflammatory etiology (NIC). Although the T cell-rich myocarditis is known to play a pathogenetic role, the relative contribution of each of the functional T cell subsets has never been thoroughly investigated. We therefore assessed gene expression of cytokines and transcription factors involved in differentiation and effector function of each functional T cell subset (TH1/TH2/TH17/Treg) in CCC, NIC, and heart donor myocardial samples. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25152568 PMCID: PMC4134835 DOI: 10.1155/2014/914326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Characteristics of patients and control heart donors whose samples were used in this study.
| CCC | NIC | N | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14 | 8 | 6 |
| Age | 47.2 ± 14.6 | 53.3 ± 7.5 | 32.2 ± 12.8 |
| Sex (M/F) | 5/9 | 0/9 | 0/6 |
| EF | 26.50 ± 8.96 | 22.73 ± 6.28 | ND |
| Fibrosis | Moderate to intense | Moderate to intense | 0 |
| LVDD | 71.64 ± 7.48 | 75.86 ± 15.84 | ND |
| Hypertrophy | Yes | Yes | No |
| Myocarditis | Moderate to intense | Absent | 0 |
Age (years); M (male); F (female); CCC (chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy); NIC (noninflammatory cardiomyopathy). Normal heart donors (N) were subject to ventilator and vasoactive drugs and had been under life support for an average of 48 hours. Characterization of the samples as myocarditis, fibrosis, and hypertrophy; reference values for the presence of myocarditis and fibrosis: absent; slight; moderate; intense; hypertrophy: Y (yes), N (no). ND (not done); EF (left ventricular ejection fraction) ≥ 55%; LVDD (left ventricle diastolic diameter); reference value: diameter 39–55 mm.
Figure 1Expression of mRNA encoding transcription factors T-bet, Gata-3, and Rorγ-T in myocardium. Real-time qPCR analysis of mRNA expression in CCC and NIC myocardium. After normalization to GAPDH mRNA, relative increase was plotted in comparison to N group and data were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt method, as described in Methods section. The horizontal bar stands for the median; dotted lines indicate twofold increase or decrease of expression as compared with the control group.
Figure 2The ratio of mRNA encoding transcription factors T-bet and Gata-3 in myocardium. The ratio of relative expression of T-bet/GATA-3 in CCC and NIC group. The ratio of relative expression was plotted in comparison to N group and data were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt method, as described in Methods section.
Figure 3Myocardial expression of cytokine mRNA. Real-time qPCR analysis of mRNA expression in CCC and NIC myocardium. After normalization to GAPDH mRNA, relative increase was plotted in comparison to N group and data were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt method, as described in Methods section. The horizontal bar stands for the median. Dotted lines indicate twofold increase or decrease of expression as compared with the control group.
Correlation of mRNA expression of T cell lineage-associated molecules against each other and versus LVDD on heart tissue from CCC patients using Spearman's rank correlation.
| mRNA expression |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| T-bet versus LVDD | 0.043 | 0.546 |
| T-bet versus Foxp3 | 0.047 | 0.538 |
| T-bet versus CTLA-4 | 0.0001 | 0.903 |
| IFN- | 0.004 | 0.714 |
| IFN- | 0.004 | 0.710 |
| IL-18 versus T-bet | 0.045 | 0.543 |
| IL-18 versus IFN- | 0.002 | 0.749 |
| IL-18 versus Foxp3 | 0.009 | 0.670 |
| IL-18 versus CTLA-4 | 0.007 | 0.648 |
| Foxp3 versus CTLA-4 | 0.001 | 0.771 |
Figure 4Expression of Foxp3, CTLA-4, IL-10, and TGF-β in myocardium. Real-time qPCR analysis of mRNA expression in CCC and NIC myocardium. After normalization to GAPDH mRNA, relative increase was plotted in comparison to N group and data were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt method, as described in Methods section. The horizontal bar stands for the median. Dotted lines indicate twofold increase or decrease of expression as compared with the control group.