Literature DB >> 25151437

Preclinical evaluation of a newly designed ureteral stent and magnetic retrieval catheter for minimally invasive stent removal.

Jin Wang1, JiaYu Feng1, WenGang Hu1, YaJun Song1, XiaoTing Xu1, MingQi Fan1, ChiBing Huang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple minimally invasive method for ureteral stent removal that does not require cystoscopy or fluoroscopic guidance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a novel ureteral stent comprising the main body of a stent and an iron oxide-coated net that was woven of processed polyester sutures. The ureteral stent was retrieved by a magnetic retrieval catheter with small hooks on the neck surface. Detailed analysis of the necessary mechanical and magnetic properties was performed, and we conducted retrieval tests of the ureteral stent from a specially designed urinary system model.
RESULTS: The breaking strength and Young modulus of the processed polyester sutures were 10.12 ± 0.30 N and 9143 ± 7 N/tex, respectively. Thermogravimetric tests showed that the iron (III) oxide powders on the processed sutures accounted for 23% of the total weight. The magnetization value of the magnetic retrieval catheter was 578 emu/g. The dissolution times of polyvinyl alcohol wrapped the net in saline or urine were 24.2 ± 2.0 and 23.6 ± 3.1 hours, respectively. All stents in both the experimental and the control groups were successfully removed from the specially designed urinary model. However, the retrieval time in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (38.6 ± 12.6 vs 59 ± 15.7 seconds; P <.05).
CONCLUSION: Ureteral stent removal using a magnetic retrieval catheter with small capture devices is considered feasible. This technique is easy to learn and should be considered as suitable for use on an outpatient basis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151437     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of pain perception associated with use of the magnetic-end ureteric double-J stent for short-term ureteric stenting.

Authors:  S Sevcenco; K Eredics; L Lusuardi; Hans Christoph Klingler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Revisiting the tethered ureteral stents in children: a novel modification.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Behnam Nabavizadeh; Sorena Keihani; Seyed Hossein Hosseini Sharifi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Comparison of a magnetic retrieval device vs. flexible cystoscopy for removal of ureteral stents in renal transplant patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Jason Akerman; Emily C L Wong; Gaurav Vasisth; Fadil Hassan; Camilla Tajzler; Kevin Piercey; Jen Hoogenes; Shahid Lambe
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Magnetic Ureteral Stents Are Feasible in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  P F Pohlmann; M Kunzelmann; K Wilhelm; A Miernik; C Gratzke; A Jud; P Pisarski; B Jänigen
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2019

Review 5.  Ureteral stents in urolithiasis.

Authors:  Matthias Beysens; Thomas O Tailly
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.