Anne-Claude V Bédard1, Jeffrey H Newcorn2, Suzanne M Clerkin3, Beth Krone2, Jin Fan4, Jeffrey M Halperin4, Kurt P Schulz2. 1. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York. Electronic address: ac.bedard@mssm.edu. 2. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York. 3. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York; Purchase College of the State University of New York. 4. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York; Queens College of the City University of New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Visuospatial working memory impairments have been implicated in the pathophysiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, most ADHD research has focused on the neural correlates of nonspatial mnemonic processes. This study examined brain activation and functional connectivity for visuospatial working memory in youth with and without ADHD. METHOD: Twenty-four youth with ADHD and 21 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing an N-back test of working memory for spatial position. Block-design analyses contrasted activation and functional connectivity separately for high (2-back) and low (1-back) working memory load conditions versus the control condition (0-back). The effect of working memory load was modeled with linear contrasts. RESULTS: The 2 groups performed comparably on the task and demonstrated similar patterns of frontoparietal activation, with no differences in linear gains in activation as working memory load increased. However, youth with ADHD showed greater activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), greater functional connectivity between the left DLPFC and left intraparietal sulcus, and reduced left DLPFC connectivity with left midcingulate cortex and PCC for the high load contrast compared to controls (p < .01; k > 100 voxels). Reanalysis using a more conservative statistical approach (p < .001; k > 100 voxels) yielded group differences in PCC activation and DLPFC-midcingulate connectivity. CONCLUSION: Youth with ADHD show decreased efficiency of DLPFC for high-load visuospatial working memory and greater reliance on posterior spatial attention circuits to store and update spatial position than healthy control youth. Findings should be replicated in larger samples.
OBJECTIVE: Visuospatial working memory impairments have been implicated in the pathophysiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, most ADHD research has focused on the neural correlates of nonspatial mnemonic processes. This study examined brain activation and functional connectivity for visuospatial working memory in youth with and without ADHD. METHOD: Twenty-four youth with ADHD and 21 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing an N-back test of working memory for spatial position. Block-design analyses contrasted activation and functional connectivity separately for high (2-back) and low (1-back) working memory load conditions versus the control condition (0-back). The effect of working memory load was modeled with linear contrasts. RESULTS: The 2 groups performed comparably on the task and demonstrated similar patterns of frontoparietal activation, with no differences in linear gains in activation as working memory load increased. However, youth with ADHD showed greater activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), greater functional connectivity between the left DLPFC and left intraparietal sulcus, and reduced left DLPFC connectivity with left midcingulate cortex and PCC for the high load contrast compared to controls (p < .01; k > 100 voxels). Reanalysis using a more conservative statistical approach (p < .001; k > 100 voxels) yielded group differences in PCC activation and DLPFC-midcingulate connectivity. CONCLUSION: Youth with ADHD show decreased efficiency of DLPFC for high-load visuospatial working memory and greater reliance on posterior spatial attention circuits to store and update spatial position than healthy control youth. Findings should be replicated in larger samples.
Authors: Jeffrey N Browndyke; Miles Berger; Patrick J Smith; Todd B Harshbarger; Zachary A Monge; Viral Panchal; Tiffany L Bisanar; Donald D Glower; John H Alexander; Roberto Cabeza; Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Agatha Lenartowicz; Steven Lu; Cameron Rodriguez; Edward P Lau; Patricia D Walshaw; James T McCracken; Mark S Cohen; Sandra K Loo Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-02-06 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Olga Tymofiyeva; Vivian X Zhou; Chuan-Mei Lee; Duan Xu; Christopher P Hess; Tony T Yang Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 3.169