Literature DB >> 25151407

Practice-based versus patient-level outcomes research in hemodialysis: the DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study) experience.

Friedrich K Port1.   

Abstract

When randomized controlled trials are unavailable, clinicians have to rely on observational studies. However, analyses using observational data to evaluate specific treatments and their associations with outcomes often are biased through confounding by clinical indication for the treatment of interest. Given the rich observational data and limited clinical trial data available in the dialysis population, successfully accounting for this bias can lead to substantial knowledge generation. In recent decades, much has been learned about statistical methods for observational data, including the fact that even extensive adjustments may not always overcome this bias, particularly when unmeasured confounders exist. In this article, examples based on the international DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study) are used to demonstrate the value of practice-based instrumental variable analyses. This methodology leverages the marked differences in practice patterns among dialysis facilities and uses the reasonable assumption that patients are assigned to a dialysis facility without consideration of its specific treatment pattern in order to minimize bias in analyses relying on observational data. Examples using the dialysis facility as an instrument that are reviewed in depth in this article include studies of dialysate sodium concentration, systolic blood pressure targets, and treatment time, demonstrate the value of this methodology to produce advanced knowledge. However, practice-based analyses have potential limitations. Specifically, observation of sufficiently large differences in practice patterns is required and these analyses should consider that the treatment of interest may be associated with other facility treatment practices. These examples from the DOPPS hopefully will stimulate advances in methodologies and critical clinical work toward improving patient care by identifying beneficial treatment practices applicable to dialysis, chronic kidney disease, and beyond.
Copyright © 2014 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confounding by indication; dialysate sodium; dialysis treatment time; instrumental variable analyses; international dialysis; observational studies; predialysis blood pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151407     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  4 in total

1.  Interdialytic Weight Gain and Hemoglobin Concentrations in the Japanese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study: Further Considerations.

Authors:  Manfred Hecking; Peter Wabel
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 2.  Factors affecting outcomes in patients reaching end-stage kidney disease worldwide: differences in access to renal replacement therapy, modality use, and haemodialysis practices.

Authors:  Bruce M Robinson; Tadao Akizawa; Kitty J Jager; Peter G Kerr; Rajiv Saran; Ronald L Pisoni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Hemodialysis outcomes and practice patterns in end-stage renal disease: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kerala.

Authors:  G R Lakshminarayana; L G Sheetal; A Mathew; R Rajesh; G Kurian; V N Unni
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Understanding associations of hemodialysis practices with clinical and patient-reported outcomes: examples from the DOPPS.

Authors:  Friedrich K Port; Hal Morgenstern; Brian A Bieber; Angelo Karaboyas; Keith P McCullough; Francesca Tentori; Ronald L Pisoni; Bruce M Robinson
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.992

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.