Literature DB >> 25151315

Use of body armor protection with fighting load impacts soldier performance and kinematics.

Kari L Loverro1, Tyler N Brown2, Megan E Coyne2, Jeffrey M Schiffman3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this evaluation was to examine how increasing body armor protection with and without a fighting load impacted soldiers' performance and mobility. Thirteen male soldiers performed one performance (repeated 30-m rushing) and three mobility tasks (walk, walk over and walk under) with three different body armor configurations and an anterior fighting load. Increasing body armor protection, decreased soldier performance, as individual and total 30-m rush times were significantly longer with greater protection. While increasing body armor protection had no impact on mobility, i.e. significant effect on trunk and lower limb biomechanics, during the walk and walk over tasks, greater protection did significantly decrease maximum trunk flexion during the walk under task. Adding fighting load may negatively impact soldier mobility, as greater maximum trunk extension was evident during the walk and walk over tasks, and decreased maximum trunk flexion exhibited during the walk under task with the fighting load.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Gait; Obstacle negotiation; Torso load

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151315     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

1.  Changes in Gait with Anteriorly Added Mass: A Pregnancy Simulation Study.

Authors:  Maureen I Ogamba; Kari L Loverro; Natalie M Laudicina; Simone V Gill; Cara L Lewis
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Biophysical Assessment and Predicted Thermophysiologic Effects of Body Armor.

Authors:  Adam W Potter; Julio A Gonzalez; Anthony J Karis; Xiaojiang Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The Impact of Load Carriage on Measures of Power and Agility in Tactical Occupations: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Aaron Joseph; Amy Wiley; Robin Orr; Benjamin Schram; J Jay Dawes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A quantitative evaluation of physical and digital approaches to centre of mass estimation.

Authors:  Sophie Macaulay; John R Hutchinson; Karl T Bates
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Associations between Fitness Measures and Change of Direction Speeds with and without Occupational Loads in Female Police Officers.

Authors:  Robin M Orr; Filip Kukić; Aleksandar Čvorović; Nenad Koropanovski; Radivoje Janković; Jay Dawes; Robert Lockie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Comparing the Effects of Different Body Armor Systems on the Occupational Performance of Police Officers.

Authors:  Ben Schram; Robin Orr; Rodney Pope; Ben Hinton; Geoff Norris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance.

Authors:  Nathan D Dicks; Tammy V Joe; Kyle J Hackney; Robert W Pettitt
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-08-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.