Literature DB >> 25151126

Water deficit in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum primarily limits net photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal conductance, increasing photorespiration, and increasing the ratio of dark respiration to gross photosynthesis.

Daryl R Chastain1, John L Snider2, Guy D Collins2, Calvin D Perry3, Jared Whitaker4, Seth A Byrd2.   

Abstract

Much effort has been expended to improve irrigation efficiency and drought tolerance of agronomic crops; however, a clear understanding of the physiological mechanisms that interact to decrease source strength and drive yield loss has not been attained. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms contributing to inhibition of net carbon assimilation under drought stress, three cultivars of Gossypium hirsutum were grown in the field under contrasting irrigation regimes during the 2012 and 2013 growing season near Camilla, Georgia, USA. Physiological measurements were conducted on three sample dates during each growing season (providing a broad range of plant water status) and included, predawn and midday leaf water potential (ΨPD and ΨMD), gross and net photosynthesis, dark respiration, photorespiration, and chlorophyll a fluorescence. End-of-season lint yield was also determined. ΨPD ranged from -0.31 to -0.95MPa, and ΨMD ranged from -1.02 to -2.67MPa, depending upon irrigation regime and sample date. G. hirsutum responded to water deficit by decreasing stomatal conductance, increasing photorespiration, and increasing the ratio of dark respiration to gross photosynthesis, thereby limiting PN and decreasing lint yield (lint yield declines observed during the 2012 growing season only). Conversely, even extreme water deficit, causing a 54% decline in PN, did not negatively affect actual quantum yield, maximum quantum yield, or photosynthetic electron transport. It is concluded that PN is primarily limited in drought-stressed G. hirsutum by decreased stomatal conductance, along with increases in respiratory and photorespiratory carbon losses, not inhibition or down-regulation of electron transport through photosystem II. It is further concluded that ΨPD is a reliable indicator of drought stress and the need for irrigation in field-grown cotton.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drought stress; Gossypium hirsutum; Photorespiration; Photosynthesis; Respiration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151126     DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0176-1617            Impact factor:   3.549


  18 in total

1.  Differential seedling growth and tolerance indices reflect drought tolerance in cotton.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmood; Muhammad Shahid Iqbal; Hongge Li; Mian Faisal Nazir; Shiguftah Khalid; Zareen Sarfraz; Daowu Hu; Chen Baojun; Xiaoli Geng; Sani Muhammad Tajo; Washu Dev; Zubair Iqbal; Pan Zhao; Guanjing Hu; Xiongming Du
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.260

2.  Coupling physiological analysis with proteomic profile to understand the photosynthetic responses of young Euterpe oleracea palms to drought.

Authors:  Hellen Oliveira de Oliveira; Gledson Luiz Salgado de Castro; Lorena Oliveira Correa; Walter Vellasco Duarte Silvestre; Sidney Vasconcelos do Nascimento; Rafael Borges da Silva Valadares; Guilherme Corrêa de Oliveira; Rodolfo Inacio Nunes Santos; Reginaldo Alves Festucci-Buselli; Hugo Alves Pinheiro
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: a coping strategy.

Authors:  Abid Ullah; Hakim Manghwar; Muhammad Shaban; Aamir Hamid Khan; Adnan Akbar; Usman Ali; Ehsan Ali; Shah Fahad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Effects of genetic manipulation of the activity of photorespiration on the redox state of photosystem I and its robustness against excess light stress under CO2-limited conditions in rice.

Authors:  Shinya Wada; Yuji Suzuki; Daisuke Takagi; Chikahiro Miyake; Amane Makino
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Photosynthetic Response of an Alpine Plant, Rhododendron delavayi Franch, to Water Stress and Recovery: The Role of Mesophyll Conductance.

Authors:  Yanfei Cai; Jihua Wang; Shifeng Li; Lu Zhang; Lvchun Peng; Weijia Xie; Feihu Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  After more than a decade of soil moisture deficit, tropical rainforest trees maintain photosynthetic capacity, despite increased leaf respiration.

Authors:  Lucy Rowland; Raquel L Lobo-do-Vale; Bradley O Christoffersen; Eliane A Melém; Bart Kruijt; Steel S Vasconcelos; Tomas Domingues; Oliver J Binks; Alex A R Oliveira; Daniel Metcalfe; Antonio C L da Costa; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick Meir
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Modulation of Photorespiratory Enzymes by Oxidative and Photo-Oxidative Stress Induced by Menadione in Leaves of Pea (Pisum sativum).

Authors:  Ramesh B Bapatla; Deepak Saini; Vetcha Aswani; Pidakala Rajsheel; Bobba Sunil; Stefan Timm; Agepati S Raghavendra
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  Exogenous melatonin improves the salt tolerance of cotton by removing active oxygen and protecting photosynthetic organs.

Authors:  Dan Jiang; Bin Lu; Liantao Liu; Wenjing Duan; Yanjun Meng; Jin Li; Ke Zhang; Hongchun Sun; Yongjiang Zhang; Hezhong Dong; Zhiying Bai; Cundong Li
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Effect of drought on photosynthesis, total antioxidant capacity, bioactive component accumulation, and the transcriptome of Atractylodes lancea.

Authors:  Aqin Zhang; Mengxue Liu; Wei Gu; Ziyun Chen; Yuchen Gu; Lingfeng Pei; Rong Tian
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Comparative transcriptome analysis highlights the crucial roles of photosynthetic system in drought stress adaptation in upland rice.

Authors:  Zheng-Feng Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Li; Ben-Ze Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.