Literature DB >> 25151095

Monitoring and reporting transfusion reactions as a quality indicator - a clinical audit.

Shabneez Hussain1, Bushra Moiz2, Fatima Azra Ausat3, Mohammad Khurshid4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: This audit was conducted as a part of a quality assurance activity to assess the frequency of receiving completely filled out blood transfusion reaction forms which were accompanied by the required samples. Once this information is known, we will elevate the bar each year to achieve 100% compliance. The sub-aim was to evaluate the frequency of the reported transfusion reactions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from 1st April 2010 to 30th April 2011. The information was evaluated and the frequency of receiving completely filled blood transfusion reaction forms was assessed. The variables identified were the type of transfusion reaction, the blood component transfused, the health care personnel filling the form, and whether there was legible handwriting and a completely filled form. Transfusion reactions were reported as a percentage of the total number of units transfused.
RESULTS: During the study period, 17,880 packed red cells, 13,200 platelets, 13,620 fresh frozen plasma and 2256 cryoprecipitate were transfused and 106 transfusion reactions (0.23%) were reported. Of these, febrile non hemolytic transfusion reaction was the most common (47%), the majority caused by packed red cells.
CONCLUSION: Eighty-four percent of the transfusion reaction forms were completely filled as per our criteria. Febrile non hemolytic transfusion reactions were the most common reactions reported.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Clinical audit; Hemovigilance; Transfusion reaction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151095     DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2014.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci        ISSN: 1473-0502            Impact factor:   1.764


  3 in total

1.  Role of National Accreditation Board of Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH) core indicators monitoring in quality and safety of blood transfusion.

Authors:  Anshu Gupta; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

2.  Analysis of Turnaround Time for Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Issues: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  A-Jin Lee; Sang-Gyung Kim
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2017-08-01

3.  Associated Factors With Acute Transfusion Reaction From Hospital Online Reporting Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chao-Yuan Yao; Ju-Huei Chien; Hsun-Yang Chuang; Tsing-Fen Ho
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.243

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.