| Literature DB >> 25150944 |
David H Gorski1, Steven P Novella2.
Abstract
Over the past two decades complementary and alternative medicine treatments relying on dubious science have been embraced by medical academia. Despite low to nonexistent prior probability that testing these treatments in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) will be successful, RCTs of these modalities have proliferated, consistent with the principles of evidence-based medicine, which underemphasize prior plausibility rooted in science. We examine this phenomenon and argue that what is needed is science-based medicine rather than evidence-based medicine.Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; clinical trials; complementary and alternative medicine; integrative medicine; science-based medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25150944 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.06.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Mol Med ISSN: 1471-4914 Impact factor: 11.951