Literature DB >> 25150934

Comparison of MDCK-MDR1 and Caco-2 cell based permeability assays for anti-malarial drug screening and drug investigations.

Xiannu Jin1, Thu-Lan Luong1, Necole Reese1, Heather Gaona1, Vanessa Collazo-Velez1, Chau Vuong1, Brittney Potter1, Jason C Sousa1, Raul Olmeda1, Qigui Li1, Lisa Xie1, Jing Zhang1, Ping Zhang1, Greg Reichard1, Victor Melendez1, Sean R Marcsisin2, Brandon S Pybus1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Malaria is a major health concern and affects over 300million people a year. Accordingly, there is an urgent need for new efficacious anti-malarial drugs. A major challenge in developing new anti-malarial drugs is to design active molecules that have preferable drug-like characteristics. These "drug-like" characteristics include physiochemical properties that affect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME). Compounds with poor ADME profiles will likely fail in vivo due to poor pharmacokinetics and/or other drug delivery related issues. There have been numerous assays developed in order to pre-screen compounds that would likely fail in further development due to poor absorption properties including PAMPA, Caco-2, and MDCK permeability assays.
METHODS: The use of cell-based permeability assays such as Caco-2 and MDCK serve as surrogate indicators of drug absorption and transport, with the two approaches often used interchangeably. We sought to evaluate both approaches in support of anti-malarial drug development. Accordingly, a comparison of both assays was conducted utilizing apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) values determined from liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses.
RESULTS: Both Caco-2 and MDCK permeability assays produced similar Papp results for potential anti-malarial compounds with low and medium permeability. Differences were observed for compounds with high permeability and compounds that were P-gp substrates. Additionally, the utility of MDCK-MDR1 permeability measurements was demonstrated in probing the role of P-glycoprotein transport in Primaquine-Chloroquine drug-drug interactions in comparison with in vivo pharmacokinetic changes. DISCUSSION: This study provides an in-depth comparison of the Caco-2 and MDCK-MDR1 cell based permeability assays and illustrates the utility of cell-based permeability assays in anti-malarial drug screening/development in regard to understanding transporter mediated changes in drug absorption/distribution. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-malarial drug development; Caco-2; MDCK; MDCK-MDR1; Permeability; Primaquine–Chloroquine interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150934     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2014.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  14 in total

1.  Brain Penetrable Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitor SW-100 Ameliorates Memory and Learning Impairments in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Alan P Kozikowski; Sida Shen; Marta Pardo; Maurício T Tavares; Dora Szarics; Veronick Benoy; Chad A Zimprich; Zsófia Kutil; Guiping Zhang; Cyril Bařinka; Matthew B Robers; Ludo Van Den Bosch; James H Eubanks; Richard S Jope
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Multi-functional scaling methodology for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic applications using integrated microphysiological systems (MPS).

Authors:  Christian Maass; Cynthia L Stokes; Linda G Griffith; Murat Cirit
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Molecular transport through membranes: Accurate permeability coefficients from multidimensional potentials of mean force and local diffusion constants.

Authors:  Rui Sun; Yining Han; Jessica M J Swanson; Jeffrey S Tan; John P Rose; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Anton Ivanyuk; Françoise Livio; Jérôme Biollaz; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Incorporation of lipolysis in monolayer permeability studies of lipid-based oral drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Tanmoy Sadhukha; Buddhadev Layek; Swayam Prabha
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.617

6.  Absorption Characteristics of Combination Medication of Realgar and Indigo Naturalis: In Vitro Transport across MDCK-MDR1 Cells and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics in Mice after Oral Administration.

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Lin Guo; Long-Fei Lin; Chang-Hai Qu; Xing-Bin Yin; Shi-Lin Luo; Xin Zhang; Hai-Ying Zhang; Xiao Liang; Jun Guan; Jian Ni
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 7.  Emerging Methods and Design Principles for Cell-Penetrant Peptides.

Authors:  Leila Peraro; Joshua A Kritzer
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Pre-clinical evaluation of CYP 2D6 dependent drug-drug interactions between primaquine and SSRI/SNRI antidepressants.

Authors:  Xiannu Jin; Brittney Potter; Thu-Lan Luong; Jennifer Nelson; Chau Vuong; Corttney Potter; Lisa Xie; Jing Zhang; Ping Zhang; Jason Sousa; Qigui Li; Brandon S Pybus; Mara Kreishman-Deitrick; Mark Hickman; Philip L Smith; Robert Paris; Gregory Reichard; Sean R Marcsisin
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Enantiospecific pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of primaquine and blood-stage antimalarial drugs.

Authors:  Kalayanee Chairat; Podjanee Jittamala; Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn; Sasithon Pukrittayakamee; Warunee Hanpithakpong; Daniel Blessborn; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P J Day; Joel Tarning
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Intracellular ABCB1 as a Possible Mechanism to Explain the Synergistic Effect of Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin Combination in COVID-19 Therapy.

Authors:  J M Scherrmann
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.