Literature DB >> 25150710

Impact of aminophylline on the pharmacodynamics of propofol in beagle dogs.

Soo-Han Lee1, Hyun-Ji Kang, Seok-Joon Jin, Do-Yang Park, Yoon-Ji Choi, Byung-Moon Choi, Eun-Kyung Lee, Gyu-Jeong Noh.   

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and aminophylline. Nine beagle dogs were randomly allocated at the propofol rates of 0.75 (group A), 1.00 (group B), and 1.25 (group C) mg/kg/min. During period 1, propofol only was infused, while during period 2, aminophylline only, at the rate of 0.69 (group A), 1.37 (group B), and 2.62 (group C) mg/kg/h. During periods 3-5, the two drugs were co-administered. The aminophylline infusion rate was 0.69 (period 3), 1.37 (period 4), and 2.62 (period 5) mg/kg/h. The aminophylline was infused from 0 to 30 h, and the propofol was infused at 24 h for 20 min. Blood samples and electroencephalograms were obtained at preset intervals. In the linear regression between log-transformed doses of aminophylline and AUC inf, the slope was 0.6976 (95% CI 0.5242-0.8710). Pharmacokinetics of aminophylline was best described by a one-compartment, with enzyme auto-induction, model. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol were best described by a three-compartment model and a sigmoid Emax model, respectively. Pharmacodynamic parameter estimates of propofol were: k(e0) = 0.805/min, E0 = 0.76, Emax = 0.398, Ce(50 na) = 2.38 μg/mL (without aminophylline-exposure), C(e50 wa) = 4.49 μg/mL (with aminophylline-exposure), and γ = 2.21. Propofol becomes less potent when exposed to aminophylline. Pharmacodynamic antagonistic interaction of aminophylline with propofol sedation, may occur, not in a dose-dependent manner, but in an all-or-none response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150710     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-014-9377-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  45 in total

1.  Artifact robustness, inter- and intraindividual baseline stability, and rational EEG parameter selection.

Authors:  Jörgen Bruhn; Thomas W Bouillon; Andreas Hoeft; Steven L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Effect of aminophylline on bispectral index.

Authors:  A Turan; D Memiş; B Karamanlýodthlu; Z Pamukçu; N Süt
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Effect of aminophylline on the protective action of common antiepileptic drugs against electroconvulsions in mice.

Authors:  S J Czuczwar; C Ikonomidou; Z Kleinrok; L Turski; W Turski
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Acute and subacute toxicities of theophylline are directly reflected by its plasma concentration in dogs.

Authors:  M Shibata; M Wachi; M Kagawa; J Kojima; K Onodera
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-04

5.  Comparative bioavailability of two sustained-release theophylline formulations in the dog.

Authors:  G Mengozzi; L Intorre; S Bertini; M Giorgi; G Soldani
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.658

6.  The effects of aminophylline on bispectral index during inhalational and total intravenous anaesthesia.

Authors:  M Hüpfl; I Schmatzer; A Buzath; H Burger; K Hörauf; G Ihra; P Marhofer; P Nagele
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Propofol vs midazolam in short-, medium-, and long-term sedation of critically ill patients. A cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  G Carrasco; R Molina; J Costa; J M Soler; L Cabré
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Aminophylline reversal of prolonged postoperative sedation induced by propofol.

Authors:  Satoru Sakurai; Atsuo Fukunaga; Kenichi Fukuda; Masataka Kasahara; Tatsuya Ichinohe; Yuzuru Kaneko
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Prolonged periodic breathing: significance in sleep studies.

Authors:  N N Finer; K J Barrington; B Hayes
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  AhR activation underlies the CYP1A autoinduction by A-998679 in rats.

Authors:  Michael J Liguori; Chih-Hung Lee; Hong Liu; Rita Ciurlionis; Amy C Ditewig; Stella Doktor; Mark E Andracki; Gerard D Gagne; Jeffrey F Waring; Kennan C Marsh; Murali Gopalakrishnan; Eric A G Blomme; Yi Yang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  3 in total

1.  Propofol target-controlled infusion modeling in rabbits: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Yan Chen; Ming Yi; Shang-Long Yao; Xue-Ping Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-05

2.  Novel Methods for Measuring Depth of Anesthesia by Quantifying Dominant Information Flow in Multichannel EEGs.

Authors:  Kab-Mun Cha; Byung-Moon Choi; Gyu-Jeong Noh; Hyun-Chool Shin
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-16

3.  Aminophylline and Ephedrine, but Not Flumazenil, Inhibit the Activity of the Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 3 Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes and Reverse the Increased Activity by Propofol.

Authors:  Sohyeon Moon; Hee Jung Baik
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.