Literature DB >> 25150708

Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Marie-Eve Letellier1, Diana Dawes, Nancy Mayo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to estimate the extent to which the content of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 goes beyond functioning and include global feeling of well-being.
METHODS: Respectively, 21 and 13 healthcare professionals agreed to link the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 to the ICF. Mappers were asked to independently identify appropriate codes for the corresponding items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 following standardized linking rules and methodology. A Delphi technique was used in order to reach consensus. The threshold of agreement was 70 %. Rounds were stopped when the threshold was obtained or when it was clear that no consensus would be reached.
RESULTS: A total of 25 items out of 30 were endorsed for the EORTC QLQ-C30: 8 items were endorsed at the 4-digit level, 15 items at the 3-digit level, and 2 items reach the consensus that the items were not cover within the ICF. Only 2 items out of 23 did not reach consensus in the EORTC QLQ-BR23. Of the 21 items endorsed, 3 items were endorsed at the 5-digit level, 10 items at the 4-digit level, and 8 at the 3-digit level.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the content of the EORTC QLQ-C30 goes beyond functioning and includes global feeling of well-being and that the content of the EORTC QLQ-BR23 is related to functioning. Furthermore, linking items to the ICF framework could be an additional method to validate the content of health-related questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150708     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0791-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  35 in total

1.  An observation on self-esteem as the linchpin of quality of life for the aged. An essay.

Authors:  A N Schwartz
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1975-10

2.  The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices capture constructs beyond symptoms and function.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Carolina Moriello; Miho Asano; Susara van der Spuy; Lois Finch
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Magnitude of late effects of breast cancer treatments on shoulder function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pamela K Levangie; Jacqueline Drouin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Jose M Valderas; Jordi Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; M Groenvold; J I Arraras; J Franklin; A te Velde; M Muller; L Franzini; A Williams; H C de Haes; P Hopwood; A Cull; N K Aaronson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prevalence of breast cancer treatment sequelae over 6 years of follow-up: the Pulling Through Study.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz; Rebecca M Speck; Sheree A Rye; Tracey DiSipio; Sandra C Hayes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema.

Authors:  Janice N Cormier; Robert L Askew; Kristi S Mungovan; Yan Xing; Merrick I Ross; Jane M Armer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Impact of lymphoedema on arm function and health-related quality of life in women following breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Diana J Dawes; Sarkis Meterissian; Mark Goldberg; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Lymphedema management.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Charles L McGarvey; Jeanne A Petrek; Sandra A Russo; Marie E Taylor; Saskia R J Thiadens
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.934

10.  Rates and predictors of consideration for adjuvant radiotherapy among high-risk breast cancer patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Stanimira Krotneva; Kristen Reidel; Mohammed Nassif; Nora Trabulsi; Nancy Mayo; Robyn Tamblyn; Ari N Meguerditchian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  4 in total

1.  Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

Authors:  S Traversoni; J Jutai; C Fundarò; S Salvini; R Casale; A Giardini
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using a personalized measure (Patient Generated Index (PGI)) to identify what matters to people with cancer.

Authors:  Ala' S Aburub; B Gagnon; A M Rodríguez; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Effect of different rehabilitation training timelines to prevent shoulder dysfunction among postoperative breast cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Shao; Qing Shu; Dan Xu; Hui Teng; Gao-Song Wu; Jin-Xuan Hou; Jun Tian
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Jens Lehmann; Maria Rothmund; David Riedl; Gerhard Rumpold; Vincent Grote; Michael J Fischer; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.