Literature DB >> 25150607

Adaptive support ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support in weaning patients after orthotopic liver transplantation.

P Celli1, E Privato2, S Ianni2, C Babetto2, C D'Arena2, N Guglielmo3, F Maldarelli2, G Paglialunga2, M Rossi3, P B Berloco3, F Ruberto2, F Pugliese2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extubation phase is an extremely critical moment in patients who have undergone orthotopic liver transplantation, who do not always have the advantage of long-lasting positive-pressure ventilation and positive expiratory end pressure; these factors can lead to splanchnic venous congestion, and this is why a rapid extubation can represent a great benefit for the graft.
METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare the adaptive support ventilation (ASV) mode with the standard mode of weaning in our intensive care unit, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support (P-SIMV), in patients who received orthotopic liver transplantation. ASV is a positive-pressure mode, in which pressure level and respiratory rate are automatically adjusted according to measured lung dynamics at each breath. Eligible patients were assigned to either ASV or P-SIMV group. The weaning protocol was based on the individual respiratory activity and structured in 4 different phases.
RESULTS: The average length of intubation was significantly shorter in the ASV group than in the P-SIMV group (90±13 vs 153±22 minutes, P=.05). The total modifications to the ventilator settings were significantly larger in the P-SIMV group (1.5±1 vs 6±2; P=.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that although both procedures are safe and easy to apply, ASV is superior in terms of weaning times, and it simplifies respiratory management. The better patient-machine interaction in ASV has been highlighted by other authors for different clusters of patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150607     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.06.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of respiratory and hemodynamic stability in patients with traumatic brain injury ventilated by two ventilator modes: Pressure regulated volume control versus synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Omid Aghadavoudi; Babak Alikiaii; Fariba Sadeghi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-11-28

2.  Automated control of mechanical ventilation during general anaesthesia: study protocol of a bicentric observational study (AVAS).

Authors:  Dirk Schädler; Georg Miestinger; Tobias Becher; Inéz Frerichs; Norbert Weiler; Christoph Hörmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Babak Alikiaii; Saeed Abbasi; Hamideh Yari; Mojtaba Akbari; Parviz Kashefi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Comparison of ventilatory modes to facilitate liberation from mechanical ventilation: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kimberley A Lewis; Dipayan Chaudhuri; Gordon Guyatt; Karen E A Burns; Karen Bosma; Long Ge; Tim Karachi; Thomas Piraino; Shannon M Fernando; Nischal Ranganath; Laurent Brochard; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.