Literature DB >> 25150391

Germ cell transplantation into mouse testes procedure.

Jose V Medrano1, Ana M Martínez-Arroyo2, Meena Sukhwani3, Inmaculada Noguera4, Alicia Quiñonero2, Jose M Martínez-Jabaloyas5, Antonio Pellicer6, Jose Remohí5, Kyle E Orwig3, Carlos Simón7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the step-by-step protocol followed to assay germ cell transplantation into the seminiferous epithelium of mouse testes.
DESIGN: Video presentation of an animal model for research in reproductive and regenerative medicine.
SETTING: Research laboratory. ANIMAL(S): Male nude mice (NU-Foxn1(nu)). INTERVENTION(S): Mice were chemically sterilized with alkylant compounds (busulfan) followed by gonadal microsurgery to inject donor germ cells. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Donor cells should be labeled with reporter genes, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP), lactose operon (LacZ), or alternatively design an effective strategy with specific antibodies to track them within the recipient testes. Sperm detection in the ejaculate can also be used as a read out. However, in this case detection of the donor genotype in the sperm is mandatory to elucidate their origin. RESULT(S): In the present study we describe the complete protocol for germ cell transplant by efferent duct injection, including the preparation of recipient mice, surgery for the germ cell transplant, and analysis of recipient testes. The main strength of this technique is that it constitutes the gold standard for a functional test of the germ cell potential as only spermatogonial stem cells are able to properly colonize the seminal lumen. Both fresh and frozen/thawed testicular cells are suitable for this technique as donor germ cells. Also, enrichment of living spermatogonial stem cells, previous to the transplant, seems to improve the efficiency of colonization. For proper colonization of germ cells, the niche should be available and thus mouse strains that lack endogenous spermatogenesis such as W/W(v) mutant mice are usually used. In the case of nonmatched donor cells, seminiferous epithelium of immune-suppressed recipient mice should be germ cell depleted before the transplant. One limitation of this technique is that the procedure can take up to 3 months. Also, in contrast to the full recovery of spermatogenesis in mouse-to-mouse transplants, xenotransplantation of germ cells from phylogenetically distant species, such as humans into mouse recipients, results in colonization of donor cells and spermatogonial expansion, but fail in their spermatogenic progression due to evolutive incompatibilities with the recipient niche. Xenografting of pieces of donor testis tissue under the skin of mouse hosts is an alternative approach that is currently being investigated to try to solve this limitation. CONCLUSION(S): Transplantation of spermatogonial stem cells into the seminal lumen of mouse testes is a functional assay that defines this cellular subpopulation by its ability to colonize it. This technique can be used as a model to elucidate the insights of spermatogonial stem cells, to produce transgenic animals by genetically manipulating donor cells before transplantation, but also it has potential applications in fertility preservation in cattle and humans as it is feasible in large animals, as recent reports have demonstrated with rhesus monkeys, that recovered spermatogenesis after allogenic transplantation, and even from human cadaver testes. Therefore spermatogonial stem cells isolated from prepuberal boys, who are treated with alkylant chemotherapy, could be returned to their testis to regenerate spermatogenesis in the future.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spermatogonial stem cells; colonization of seminiferous epithelium; germ cell transplantation; regeneration of spermatogenesis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150391     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

Review 1.  Engineered reproductive tissues.

Authors:  Emma S Gargus; Hunter B Rogers; Kelly E McKinnon; Maxwell E Edmonds; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Changes in Sexual Behavior of Orchidectomized Rats Under Influence of Allotransplantation of Testicular Interstitial Cell Suspension.

Authors:  Bo Deng; Tatyana Bondarenko; Oleksandr Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Current standing and future directions in pediatric oncofertility: a narrative review.

Authors:  Glen A Lau; Anthony J Schaeffer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

4.  Spermatogonial Stem Cell Numbers Are Reduced by Transient Inhibition of GDNF Signaling but Restored by Self-Renewing Replication when Signaling Resumes.

Authors:  Nicole Parker; Andrew Laychur; Meena Sukwani; Kyle E Orwig; Jon M Oatley; Chao Zhang; Florentine U Rutaganira; Kevan Shokat; William W Wright
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 7.765

5.  Histologic Analysis of Testes from Prepubertal Patients Treated with Chemotherapy Associates Impaired Germ Cell Counts with Cumulative Doses of Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Cytarabine, and Asparaginase.

Authors:  Jose V Medrano; D Hervás; T Vilanova-Pérez; A Navarro-Gomezlechon; E Goossens; A Pellicer; M M Andrés; E Novella-Maestre
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 6.  Pediatric and Adolescent Oncofertility in Male Patients-From Alpha to Omega.

Authors:  Ovidiu Bîcă; Ioan Sârbu; Carmen Iulia Ciongradi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Human somatic cells subjected to genetic induction with six germ line-related factors display meiotic germ cell-like features.

Authors:  Jose V Medrano; Ana M Martínez-Arroyo; Jose M Míguez; Inmaculada Moreno; Sebastián Martínez; Alicia Quiñonero; Patricia Díaz-Gimeno; Ana I Marqués-Marí; Antonio Pellicer; Jose Remohí; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Cell-specific ablation in the testis: what have we learned?

Authors:  L B Smith; P J O'Shaughnessy; D Rebourcet
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.842

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.