Literature DB >> 25149902

Whole body mechanics differ among running and cutting maneuvers in skilled athletes.

Kathryn L Havens1, Susan M Sigward2.   

Abstract

Quick changes of direction during running (cutting) represent a whole body mechanical challenge, as they require deceleration and translation of the body during ongoing movement. While much is known with respect to whole body demands during walking turns, whole body mechanics and anticipatory adjustments necessary for cutting are unclear. As the ability to rapidly change direction is critical to athletes' success in many sports, a better understanding of whole body adjustments made during cuts is needed. Whole body center of mass velocity and position during the approach and execution steps of three tasks (straight running, 45° sidestep cut, and 90° sidestep cut) performed as fast as possible were compared in 25 healthy soccer athletes. Repeated measure ANOVA revealed that overall, braking and translation were greater during the cuts compared to the straight run. Interestingly, with systematically increased cut angle, disproportionately greater braking but proportionately greater translation was observed. Anticipatory adjustments made prior to the execution of the cuts suggested that individuals evenly distributed the deceleration and redirection demands across steps of the 45° cut but prioritized deceleration over translation during the approach step of the 90° cut.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Anticipatory postural adjustments; Cutting; Dynamic stability; Turning; Whole body mechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25149902     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of biases in dynamic margins of stability introduced by the use of simplified center of mass estimates during walking and turning.

Authors:  Kathryn L Havens; Tatri Mukherjee; James M Finley
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Athletic groin pain (part 2): a prospective cohort study on the biomechanical evaluation of change of direction identifies three clusters of movement patterns.

Authors:  A Franklyn-Miller; C Richter; E King; S Gore; K Moran; S Strike; E C Falvey
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Quantifying performance on an outdoor agility drill using foot-mounted inertial measurement units.

Authors:  Antonia M Zaferiou; Lauro Ojeda; Stephen M Cain; Rachel V Vitali; Steven P Davidson; Leia Stirling; Noel C Perkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The Effect of Angle and Velocity on Change of Direction Biomechanics: An Angle-Velocity Trade-Off.

Authors:  Thomas Dos'Santos; Christopher Thomas; Paul Comfort; Paul A Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application.

Authors:  Joao Beleboni Marques; Darren James Paul; Phil Graham-Smith; Paul James Read
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Human myoelectric spatial patterns differ among lower limb muscles and locomotion speeds.

Authors:  Bryan R Schlink; Andrew D Nordin; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-12

7.  Metabolic Power Requirement of Change of Direction Speed in Young Soccer Players: Not All Is What It Seems.

Authors:  Karim Hader; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva; Dino Palazzi; Saïd Ahmaidi; Martin Buchheit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Energy expenditure associated with walking speed and angle of turn in children.

Authors:  Sam G M Crossley; Kelly A Mackintosh; Rory P Wilson; Leanne J Lester; Iwan W Griffiths; Melitta A McNarry
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  A Novel and Safe Approach to Simulate Cutting Movements Using Ground Reaction Forces.

Authors:  Amelia S Lanier; Brian A Knarr; Nicholas Stergiou; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Clinical and biomechanical outcomes of rehabilitation targeting intersegmental control in athletic groin pain: prospective cohort of 205 patients.

Authors:  Enda King; Andrew Franklyn-Miller; Chris Richter; Eamon O'Reilly; Mark Doolan; Kieran Moran; Siobhan Strike; Éanna Falvey
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.