Literature DB >> 25149024

New formula for evaluation of the QT interval in patients with left bundle branch block.

Harilaos Bogossian1, Gerrit Frommeyer2, Ilias Ninios3, Fuad Hasan3, Quy Suu Nguyen3, Zana Karosiene3, Dejan Mijic3, Axel Kloppe3, Hawal Suleiman3, Dirk Bandorski3, Melchior Seyfarth4, Bernd Lemke3, Lars Eckardt2, Markus Zarse5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QT prolongation both are associated with a worse prognosis. LBBB lengthens the QT interval. To date it is not known whether QT prolongation during LBBB differs in repolarization from QT prolongation during narrow QRS.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present proof-of-concept-study was to develop a formula that allows comparison of the adjusted QT interval during LBBB with reference values and thereby allows interpretation of the QT interval irrespective of QRS widening.
METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with sinus rhythm (SR) and narrow QRS underwent electrophysiologic study for ablation. In all patients, the intrinsic QRS ,QT, and JT times were measured during SR, and ventricular pacing from both the right ventricular apex (RVA) and the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) caused LBBB. We determined prolongation of the QT during as compared to SR (ΔQT). ΔQT was then divided by the QRS length during pacing QRS (QRSb). This describes the percentage of the QRS duration at LBBB, which must be subtracted from the measured QT (QTb) to determine the modified QT interval (QTm).
RESULTS: The ratio of ΔQT to paced QRS was calculated as 48.3% (RVA) and 48.8% (RVOT) (mean 48.5%). The ratio intrinsic of JTi to paced JT was 1.0055 (RVA) and 1.0087 (RVOT). There was no significant difference in intrinsic JT vs paced JT (P = .2).
CONCLUSION: Right ventricular pacing causes prolongation of the QT due to a paced LBBB without prolongation of the JT time. In our study, we showed that QT prolongation caused by LBBB constitutes 48.5% of the QRS width. This is the value that must be subtracted from the measured QT in LBBB in order to estimate the modified QT. Thus, the resulting formula for "modified QT" estimation in LBBB is QTm = QTb - 48.5% * (QRSb).
Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JT interval; Left bundle branch block; Long QT; QT formula; QT interval; QT prolongation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25149024     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  14 in total

1.  Cutting off half of QRS duration can cause overcorrection of QT interval in left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Binhao Wang; Li Zhang; Yunlong Xia
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Reply: QT interval measurements in patients with left bundle branch block. There is yet more to learn about repolarization.

Authors:  Harilaos Bogossian; Gerrit Frommeyer; Markus Zarse
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Application of the Bogossian formula for evaluation of the QT interval in pacemaker patients with stimulated left bundle branch block.

Authors:  K F Weipert; H Bogossian; P Conzen; G Frommeyer; C Gemein; I Helmig; R Chasan; L Eckardt; M Seyfarth; B Lemke; M Zarse; C W Hamm; J Schmitt; D Erkapic
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  A new experimentally validated formula to calculate the QT interval in the presence of left bundle branch block holds true in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Harilaos Bogossian; Gerrit Frommeyer; Ilias Ninios; Eleni Pechlivanidou; Fuad Hasan; Quy Suu Nguyen; Dejan Mijic; Axel Kloppe; Zana Karosiene; Artak Margkarian; Dirk Bandorski; Dominik Schultes; Damir Erkapic; Melchior Seyfarth; Bernd Lemke; Lars Eckardt; Markus Zarse
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Carcinoid Syndrome-Induced Ventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  Austin B Rupp; Abdulmohsin Ahmadjee; Jack H Morshedzadeh; Ravi Ranjan
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-21

6.  QTc interval evaluation in patients with right bundle branch block or bifascicular blocks.

Authors:  Damir Erkapic; Gerrit Frommeyer; Niklas Brettner; Korkut Sözener; Harry J G M Crijns; Melchior Seyfarth; Christian W Hamm; Harilaos Bogossian
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Peyman Tabatabaei; Ala Keikhavani; Majid Haghjoo; Amirfarjam Fazelifar; Zahra Emkanjoo; Mahbobeh Zeighami; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Behshid Ghadrdoost; Abolfath Alizadeh
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-03-05

Review 8.  Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management of QT Prolongation Induced by Cancer Therapies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andreu Porta-Sánchez; Cameron Gilbert; Danna Spears; Eitan Amir; Joyce Chan; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  COVID-19 therapies and their impact on QT interval prolongation: A multicentre retrospective study on 196 patients.

Authors:  M Bianco; C A Biolè; S Campagnuolo; F Pietrangiolillo; A Spirito; A Galluzzo; I Nuñez-Gil; P Destefanis; A Luciano; P Carvalho; G P Varalda; A Previti; M Gravellone; A Travieso Gonzalez; F Ugo; G Pivano; F Rametta; A Perboni; R Pozzi; L Montagna; E Cerrato
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-09-11

10.  The QT Interval Dynamic in a Human Experimental Model of Controlled Heart Rate and QRS Widening.

Authors:  Santiago Colunga; Remigio Padrón; Daniel García-Iglesias; José Manuel Rubín; Diego Pérez; Raquel Del Valle; Pablo Avanzas; César Morís; David Calvo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.