| Literature DB >> 25148849 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intestinal bladder augmentation has more disadvantages. One of the most promising alternative methods is tissue engineering in combination with surgical construction. Small intestine submucosa (SIS) is commonly used materials in tissue engineer. The aim of this study is determine the histologic and functional characteristics of SIS as bladder wall replacement in a rabbit augmentation model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25148849 PMCID: PMC4150863 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-69
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Urol ISSN: 1471-2490 Impact factor: 2.264
Figure 1Macroscopic and HE evaluation. a. The SIS patch (1.0 × 2.0 cm) was already grafted onto the host bladder. b. Regenerated tissue in the arrows 24 weeks post-operation. c. Thin arrow marked the regenerated transitional epithelium in the region of the SIS graft. Coarse arrow marked the infiltrated inflammatory cells (×20). d. Thin arrow marked the regenerated transitional epithelium. Coarse arrow marked the new vessels (×10).
Figure 2Compare of OD value. The OD value of regenerated tissue was 0.067 ± 0.022 in group A, 0.082 ± 0.017 in group B, and 0.148 ± 0.099 in group C. Compared with normal bladder (0.140 ± 0.021 in group A, 0.130 ± 0.020 in group B, 0.152 ± 0.017 in group C), groups A and B were significantly different with normal bladder (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in group C and normal bladder (p > 0.05).
Comparisons between regenerated and normal bladder and results of urodynamic testing
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder volume (ml) | 40.30 ± 7.6* | 26.11 ± 4.8* | 55.7 ± 27.2 | 60.4 ± 24.7 | 48.98 ± 27.8* | 57.80 ± 27.7* |
| | P = 0.021 | P = 0.111 | P = 0.001 | |||
| Compliance (ml/cmH2O) | 2.74 ± 1.57 | 2.36 ± 0.71 | 4.9 ± 2.04 | 5.1 ± 1.54 | 6.88 ± 4.07 | 6.2±3.86 |
| P = 0.653 | P = 0.272 | P = 0.732 | ||||
*P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Comparisons between regenerated and normal bladder tissues and the results of the detrusor strip study
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency (min−1) | ___ | 4.80 ± 1.20* | 2.88 ± 0.49* | 3.64 ± 0.98 | 4.35 ± 1.25 | |
| | | | (p = 0.005) | (P = 0.442) | ||
| Amplitude (g) | ___ | 0.47 ± 0.083* | 0.13 ± 0.014* | 0.67 ± 0.09 | 0.50 ± 0.25 | |
| (p = 0.000) | (p = 0.051.) | |||||
*P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.