Literature DB >> 25148675

Identification of the Best Anthropometric Predictors of Serum High- and Low-Density Lipoproteins Using Machine Learning.

Bum Ju Lee, Jong Yeol Kim.   

Abstract

Serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are associated with risk factors for various diseases and are related to anthropometric measures. However, controversy remains regarding the best anthropometric indicators of the HDL and LDL cholesterol levels. The objectives of this study were to identify the best predictors of HDL and LDL cholesterol using statistical analyses and two machine learning algorithms and to compare the predictive power of combined anthropometric measures in Korean adults. A total of 13,014 subjects participated in this study. The anthropometric measures were assessed with binary logistic regression (LR) to evaluate statistically significant differences between the subjects with normal and high LDL cholesterol levels and between the subjects with normal and low HDL cholesterol levels. LR and the naive Bayes algorithm (NB), which provides more reasonable and reliable results, were used in the analyses of the predictive power of individual and combined measures. The best predictor of HDL was the rib to hip ratio (p =< 0.0001; odds ratio (OR) = 1.895; area under curve (AUC) = 0.681) in women and the waist to hip ratio (WHR) (p =< 0.0001; OR = 1.624; AUC = 0.633) in men. In women, the strongest indicator of LDL was age (p =< 0.0001; OR = 1.662; AUC by NB = 0.653 ; AUC by LR = 0.636). Among the anthropometric measures, the body mass index (BMI), WHR, forehead to waist ratio, forehead to rib ratio, and forehead to chest ratio were the strongest predictors of LDL; these measures had similar predictive powers. The strongest predictor in men was BMI (p =< 0.0001; OR = 1.369; AUC by NB = 0.594; AUC by LR = 0.595 ). The predictive power of almost all individual anthropometric measures was higher for HDL than for LDL, and the predictive power for both HDL and LDL in women was higher than for men. A combination of anthropometric measures slightly improved the predictive power for both HDL and LDL cholesterol. The best indicator for HDL and LDL might differ according to the type of cholesterol and the gender. In women, but not men, age was the variable that strongly predicted HDL and LDL cholesterol levels. Our findings provide new information for the development of better initial screening tools for HDL and LDL cholesterol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25148675     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2350014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of anthropometric and body composition indices in the identification of metabolic risk factors.

Authors:  Bum Ju Lee; Mi Hong Yim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Association of peptic ulcer disease with obesity, nutritional components, and blood parameters in the Korean population.

Authors:  Jihye Kim; Keun Ho Kim; Bum Ju Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparative analysis of anthropometric indices of obesity as correlates and potential predictors of risk for hypertension and prehypertension in a population in Nigeria.

Authors:  Chimaobi James Ononamadu; Chinwe Nonyelum Ezekwesili; Onyemaechi Faith Onyeukwu; Uchenna Francis Umeoguaju; Obiajulu Christian Ezeigwe; Godwin Okwudiri Ihegboro
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 1.167

4.  Identification of Hemoglobin Levels Based on Anthropometric Indices in Elderly Koreans.

Authors:  Bum Ju Lee; Jong Yeol Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Association between Aerobic Exercise and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels across Various Ranges of Body Mass Index and Waist-Hip Ratio and the Modulating Role of the Hepatic Lipase rs1800588 Variant.

Authors:  Yasser Nassef; Oswald Ndi Nfor; Kuan-Jung Lee; Ming-Chih Chou; Yung-Po Liaw
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  A comparison of trunk circumference and width indices for hypertension and type 2 diabetes in a large-scale screening: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bum Ju Lee; Boncho Ku
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.