The proton-coupled oligopeptide transporter PEPT1 (SLC15A1) is abundantly expressed in the small intestine, but not colon, of mammals and found to mediate the uptake of di/tripeptides and peptide-like drugs from the intestinal lumen. However, species differences have been observed in both the expression (and localization) of PEPT1 and its substrate affinity. With this in mind, the objectives of this study were to develop a humanized PEPT1 mouse model (huPEPT1) and to characterize hPEPT1 expression and functional activity in the intestines. Thus, after generating huPEPT1 mice in animals previously nulled for mouse Pept1, phenotypic, PCR, and immunoblot analyses were performed, along with in situ single-pass intestinal perfusion and in vivo oral pharmacokinetic studies with a model dipeptide, glycylsarcosine (GlySar). Overall, the huPEPT1 mice had normal survival rates, fertility, litter size, gender distribution, and body weight. There was no obvious behavioral or pathological phenotype. The mRNA and protein profiles indicated that huPEPT1 mice had substantial PEPT1 expression in all regions of the small intestine (i.e., duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) along with low but measurable expression in both proximal and distal segments of the colon. In agreement with PEPT1 expression, the in situ permeability of GlySar in huPEPT1 mice was similar to but lower than wildtype animals in small intestine, and greater than wildtype mice in colon. However, a species difference existed in the in situ transport kinetics of jejunal PEPT1, in which the maximal flux and Michaelis constant of GlySar were reduced 7-fold and 2- to 4-fold, respectively, in huPEPT1 compared to wildtype mice. Still, the in vivo function of intestinal PEPT1 appeared fully restored (compared to Pept1 knockout mice) as indicated by the nearly identical pharmacokinetics and plasma concentration-time profiles following a 5.0 nmol/g oral dose of GlySar to huPEPT1 and wildtype mice. This study reports, for the first time, the development and characterization of mice humanized for PEPT1. This novel transgenic huPEPT1 mouse model should prove useful in examining the role, relevance, and regulation of PEPT1 in diet and disease, and in the drug discovery process.
The proton-coupled oligopeptide transporter PEPT1 (SLC15A1) is abundantly expressed in the small intestine, but not colon, of mammals and found to mediate the uptake of di/tripeptides and peptide-like drugs from the intestinal lumen. However, species differences have been observed in both the expression (and localization) of PEPT1 and its substrate affinity. With this in mind, the objectives of this study were to develop a humanized PEPT1mouse model (huPEPT1) and to characterize hPEPT1 expression and functional activity in the intestines. Thus, after generating huPEPT1 mice in animals previously nulled for mousePept1, phenotypic, PCR, and immunoblot analyses were performed, along with in situ single-pass intestinal perfusion and in vivo oral pharmacokinetic studies with a model dipeptide, glycylsarcosine (GlySar). Overall, the huPEPT1 mice had normal survival rates, fertility, litter size, gender distribution, and body weight. There was no obvious behavioral or pathological phenotype. The mRNA and protein profiles indicated that huPEPT1 mice had substantial PEPT1 expression in all regions of the small intestine (i.e., duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) along with low but measurable expression in both proximal and distal segments of the colon. In agreement with PEPT1 expression, the in situ permeability of GlySar in huPEPT1 mice was similar to but lower than wildtype animals in small intestine, and greater than wildtype mice in colon. However, a species difference existed in the in situ transport kinetics of jejunal PEPT1, in which the maximal flux and Michaelis constant of GlySar were reduced 7-fold and 2- to 4-fold, respectively, in huPEPT1 compared to wildtype mice. Still, the in vivo function of intestinal PEPT1 appeared fully restored (compared to Pept1 knockout mice) as indicated by the nearly identical pharmacokinetics and plasma concentration-time profiles following a 5.0 nmol/g oral dose of GlySar to huPEPT1 and wildtype mice. This study reports, for the first time, the development and characterization of mice humanized for PEPT1. This novel transgenic huPEPT1 mouse model should prove useful in examining the role, relevance, and regulation of PEPT1 in diet and disease, and in the drug discovery process.
Entities:
Keywords:
PEPT1; glycylsarcosine; humanized mice; in situ intestinal perfusions; in vivo oral pharmacokinetics; mRNA and protein expression
MammalianPEPT1 (SLC15A1), along with
PEPT2 (SLC15A2), PHT1 (SLC15A4)
and PHT2 (SLC15A3), belong to the solute carrier group of membrane
transport proteins (i.e., SLC15) that mediate the cellular uptake
of di- and tripeptides in addition to several peptidomimetic drugs.
Following discovery of rabbitPept1,[1] the
human and mouse orthologues were cloned (85% amino acid identity)[2,3] in which they contained 708 and 709 amino acid residues, respectively.
These Pept1 transporters have 12 transmembrane domains, C- and N-termini
facing the cytoplasm, and Tyr12, His57, Tyr64, Trp294, Phe297, and
Glu595 residues located within highly conserved transmembrane domains
(H1, H2, H5, H7, and H10).[4]In contrast
to PEPT2, a high-affinity low-capacity transporter
primarily responsible for the reabsorption of peptides/mimetics in
kidney,[5] PEPT1 is a low-affinity high-capacity
transporter that is important in the absorption of digested peptides
(mostly di- and tripeptides) from dietary protein in the small intestine.
PEPT1 is also crucial for the intestinal uptake and absorption of
therapeutic drugs such as the β-lactam antibiotic cefadroxil[6] and the antiviral nucleoside prodrug valacyclovir.[7] Previous studies using polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) and immunoblot analyses have demonstrated that in rodents and
humansPEPT1 is abundantly expressed in the apical membrane of enterocytes
in duodenal, jejunal, and ileal regions.[8−11] The expression of PEPT1 in colon
is controversial and perhaps species dependent. Nevertheless, under
normal conditions, PEPT1 is unlikely to have much impact on the absorption
of peptides/mimetics from this region.Species differences in
PEPT1 expression and functional activity
have been reported in mouse and human colonic tissue.[11,12] Moreover, our laboratory demonstrated in vivo that
both cefadroxil[6] and valacyclovir[7] exhibited dose-proportional absorption in wildtype
and Pept1 knockout mice after oral dose escalation.
The “apparent” dose linearity observed in these mouse
studies is contrary to the nonlinear intestinal absorption kinetics
reported in rats and humans for cefadroxil[13,14] and in humans for valacyclovir.[15] Interspecies
differences in transporter-mediated activity are difficult to sort
out given that studies are usually performed by different investigators
and laboratories and especially under varying experimental conditions.
For this reason, we demonstrated in a single system, yeastPichia pastoris, a species difference in the affinity of
glycylsarcosine (GlySar) for rat, mouse, and humanPEPT1 transformants.[16] These findings, and others, clearly illustrate
that species differences may impact the intestinal absorption and
pharmacokinetics of PEPT1 substrates, thereby, making it more difficult
to predict systemic drug exposure. It is also clear that cell culture
systems, naive or transfected with transporters of interest, as well
as further in vitro or in situ methods,
will not reflect what happens in humans under physiological conditions.The past decade has shown a growing interest in the development
of humanized mice to overcome species differences in drug metabolism,
disposition, and regulation.[17−21] Studies with humanized mouse models not only provide a mechanistic
understanding of species differences but also improve our ability
to optimize and predict the pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, and safety
profiles of xenobiotics in humans. With this in mind, the primary
aim of this study was to generate a humanized PEPT1 (huPEPT1) mouse model, which was nulled for the
mousePept1 gene and expresses the human transporter
in the tissues where Pept1 is normally expressed.
The secondary aim was to characterize the huPEPT1 mice with respect to hPEPT1 expression and functional activity in
the intestines, as examined by in situ permeability
and in vivo oral absorption studies with the model
dipeptideGlySar.
Experimental Section
Chemicals
[3H]-GlySar (98 mCi/mmol), [14C]-GlySar (113 mCi/mmol),
and [14C]-inulin 5000
(1.1 mCi/g) were purchased from Moravek Biochemicals (Brea, CA). Unlabeled
GlySar and inulin 5000 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO). Rabbit antihuman PEPT1 antiserum was generously provided by Dr.
Hannelore Daniel (Technische Universität München, Germany).
Protease inhibitor cocktail was purchased from Roche (Seattle, WA)
and Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix from Applied Biosystems (Foster
City, CA). All other chemicals were obtained from standard sources.
Animals
Gender- and weight-matched mice (8 to 10 weeks)
were provided in-house for mPept1 (wildtype), mPept1/hPEPT1 (mPept1 knockout), and mPept1/hPEPT1 (humanized or huPEPT1) genotypes. All animals were bred on a C57BL/6 background (>99%
congenic) in which the Pept1 knockout and humanized
mice were identified by genotyping and culled from the same litters.
The mice were housed in a temperature-controlled environment with
12 h light and dark cycles and received a standard diet and water ad libitum (Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI). All mouse studies were performed in accordance
with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted
and promulgated by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Generation
and Molecular Characterization of Humanized PEPT1 Mice
huPEPT1 mice were generated
using an approach described previously.[22] In brief, bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) containing the PEPT1 gene were obtained from a human BAC library (Empire
Genomics, Buffalo, NY). A BAC clone [RP11-782G13; ∼179 kb;
CHR13 (98,091,462–98,270,723)], containing the entire 5′-terminal
regulatory elements, coding area, and 3′-terminal regulatory
elements, was then microinjected into the male pronucleus of fertilized
one-cell embryos obtained from Pept1mice on a C57BL/6 background.[23] The pronuclear stage embryos were then transferred
into the uterus of pseudopregnant recipient animals. Founder mice
were screened to identify an animal containing one copy of the human
BAC after which these animals were bred (i.e., mPept1/hPEPT1 × mPept1/hPEPT1mice) to maintain hemizygous
transgenic lines.Transgenic huPEPT1 alleles
were detected in offspring by PCR using genomic DNA isolated from
tail biopsies. The first set had a forward primer 5′-ATCTTCTTCATCGTGGTCAATG-3′
and a reverse primer 5′-CCCAGCTGATGAAATTTGTGAA-3′,
with a product size of 200 bp. The second set had a forward primer
5′-CCAATCTGCTCACACAGGATAGAGAGGGCAGG-3′ and a reverse
primer 5′-CCTTGAGGCTGTCCAAGTGATTCAGGCCATCG-3′,
with a product size of 524 bp. The endogenous mPept1 gene was confirmed as nullified using a PCR approach described previously.[23] The PCR conditions were 1 cycle at 94 °C
for 2 min, 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 45 s,
and 72 °C for 60 s, and then 72 °C for 10 min.
Initial Phenotypic
Analysis
The huPEPT1 mice were evaluated
for viability, fertility, serum clinical chemistry,
and histology, as performed previously for wildtype and Pept1 knockout mice.[23]
Real-time PCR and Immunoblot
Analyses
Quantitation
of hPEPT1, mPept1, mPept2, mPht1, mPht2, and other relevant genes was performed
in the small intestine, colon, and kidney of wildtype, mPept1 knockout, and humanized PEPT1mice using a 7300
Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as described
before.[24] In brief, 2.0 μg of total
RNA, isolated using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA),
was reversely transcribed into cDNA using the Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen,
Valencia, CA) with 16-mer random primers. The mouseGapdh gene was used as an internal control of cDNA quality and quantity.
The primers (Table 1) were designed using Primer
3.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and synthesized by Integrated
DNA Technologies (Coraville, IA). The real-time PCR thermal conditions
were 1 cycle at 50 °C for 2 min, 1 cycle at 95 °C for 10
min, and then 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for
1 min. The ΔCT method was used to calculate the relative levels
of target gene transcripts in mice, where the ratio of target gene
to mGapdh was equal to 2–ΔCT, ΔCT = CT(gene) – CT (mGapdh).
Table 1
Primers Used in Quantitative Real
Time PCR
genea
forward primer (5′–3′)
reverse primer (5′–3′)
mGapdh (EC = 1.2.1.12)
GAGACAGCCGCATCTTCTTGT
CACACCGACCTTCACCATTTT
hPEPT1
(SLC15A1)
TGACCTCACAGACCACAACCA
GCCAGGCCGATCAAGGA
mPept1 (Slc15a1)
CCACGGCCATTTACCATACG
TGCGATCAGAGCTCCAAGAA
mPept2 (Slc15a2)
TGCAGAGGCACGGACTAGATAC
GGGTGTGATGAACGTAGAAATCAA
mPht1
(Slc15a4)
GCTGCCACCTGCATTACTACTTC
CGTACTTCACAGACACAATGAGGAA
mPht2 (Slc15a3)
GCTGAAGCTTGCGTTCCAA
AACAGGTGGGCACTTTCAGAGT
mBphl (EC = 3.1.-.-)
GCCAAGGTGGCTGTGAATG
GATCGCATGTTCCCCTTCTC
mAtb0,+ (Slc6a14)
TCAGGATTTGACTTGGCATTCA
CAAGGCCCAATGTTAAAAGCA
mOat1
(Slc22a6)
CCACCTGCTAATGCCAACCT
GATTCGGGTCGTCCTTGCT
mOat2 (Slc22a7)
TGTCGCAAAGACCCTCGTACT
ACATCATCATGCAGCACAGTGA
mOat3
(Slc22a8)
GCCCCAGCCTCACTGTCTATAT
ACATTCAAGATAATGGTGCTCAGAGA
mOct1 (Slc22a1)
TGGTGTTCAGGCTGATGGAA
GCCCAAAACCCCAAACAAA
mMate1 (Slc47a1)
TTCTGCTTGTGACACGCTCAT
AGTGTCCCCCTTTGCAGGAT
mMate2
(Slc47a2)
GACATCATTTCCCTTGTGAGTCAA
GCCCGCAAGTGCATCAA
mPat1 (Slc36a1)
TCTGCTGTGTCTACTTCGTGTTTCT
GGATCACGGTCACATTGTTGTT
Shown as gene name (solute carrier group
or enzyme commission
number) for human (h) and mouse (m) transporters or enzymes.
Shown as gene name (solute carrier group
or enzyme commission
number) for human (h) and mouse (m) transporters or enzymes.Different segments of small intestine,
colon, and kidney of wildtype,
mPept1 knockout, and huPEPT1 mice
were homogenized in 2.0 mL of Nonidet P40-lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl,
150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P40, and proteinase inhibitor cocktail, pH
8.0), as described previously for immunoblot analyses.[12] The homogenates were sonicated for 10 pulses
in ice at half strength, and then centrifuged at 15,000g at 4 °C for 15 min. The final concentration of proteins was
measured with a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The
proteins were denatured at 40 °C for 45 min, resolved using 10%
SDS-PAGE, transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA),
and then blotted with specific rabbit antihuman PEPT1 antiserum[11] (1:3000 dilution) or specific rabbit antimouse
PEPT1 antiserum[12] (1:5000 dilution).
In Situ Single-Pass Intestinal Perfusion Studies
Wildtype, mPept1 knockout, and humanized PEPT1mice were fasted overnight (∼12 h), but with
free access to water, and anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (40–60
mg/kg intraperitoneal). The permeability of GlySar in regional segments
of the intestines (i.e., duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon) was
then determined simultaneously, as described previously.[12] In brief, the mouse was placed on top of a heating
pad to maintain body temperature, the abdominal area sterilized with
70% ethanol, and the intestine exposed by making an incision along
its midline. A 4 cm segment of duodenum, 8 cm segment of proximal
jejunum (∼2 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz), 6 cm segment
of ileum (∼1 cm proximal to the cecum), and 4 cm segment of
colon (∼0.5 cm distal to the cecum) was isolated and followed
by incisions at both the proximal and distal ends. After the segment
was rinsed with 0.9% isotonic saline solution, a glass cannula (2.0
mm outer diameter) was inserted at each end of the intestinal segment
and secured in place with silk sutures. The isolated intestinal segment
was covered with saline-wetted gauze and parafilm to prevent dehydration.
After cannulation, the animals were then transferred to a temperature-controlled
chamber at 31 °C to maintain body temperature during the entire
perfusion procedure. The cannulas were then connected to inlet tubing
that was attached to a 30 mL syringe (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ USA)
on a perfusion pump (Model 22: Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, MA)
and to outlet tubing that was placed in a collection vial.The
perfusate buffer contained 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, and 10 mM MES/Tris
(pH 6.5), plus 10 μM [3H]-GlySar (0.5 μCi)
and 0.01% (w/v) [14C]-inulin-5000 (0.25 μCi), which
severed as a nonabsorbable marker to correct for water flux during
the perfusions. Buffer was perfused through each intestinal segment
at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/min, and the exiting perfusate was collected
every 10 min over a 90 min period. A 100 μL aliquot from each
collection was added to a vial containing 6.0 mL of scintillation
cocktail (Ecolite, MP Biochemicals, Solon, OH), and the samples were
measured for radioactivity by a dual-channel liquid scintillation
counter (Beckman LS 6000 SC, Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA).
At the end of experimentation, the length of all four intestinal segments
was measured.Concentration-dependent studies were also performed
in the jejunum
of wildtype and huPEPT1 mice, by varying the perfusate
concentrations of GlySar over a wide range (0.01–50 mM), to
assess its saturable transport kinetics.
In Vivo Oral Pharmacokinetic Studies
Following an overnight fast
(∼12 h), wildtype, mPept1 knockout, and huPEPT1 mice were anesthetized briefly
with isoflurane and administered 5.0 nmol/g [14C]-GlySar
(5.0 μCi/mouse in 0.2 mL normal saline) orally by gavage. After
dosing, serial blood samples (15 μL) were collected at 5, 7.5,
15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 360 min via tail transections.
The blood samples were placed in tubes containing 1.0 μL of
EDTA-K3 and centrifuged at 3000g for 3 min to obtain
plasma (∼5 μL). Animals were returned to their cages
between blood sampling where they had free access to water and, 2
h after dosing, food. Radioactivity in the plasma samples was measured
by a dual-channel liquid scintillation counter (Beckman LS 6000 SC,
Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA).
Data Analysis
The steady-state loss of drug from perfusate
through the intestinal segments was achieved approximately 30 min
after the start of perfusion. The effective permeability (Peff) of drug was calculated according to a complete
radial mixing parallel tube model:[25,26]where Q is the perfusion
flow rate (0.1 mL/min), Cout is the outlet
GlySar concentration after water flux correction, C is the inlet GlySar concentration, R is the
internal radius (0.1 cm for small intestine and 0.2 cm for colon),
and L is the length of intestinal segment.The concentration-dependent flux (J) of GlySar in
jejunum was best fit to a single Michaelis–Menten term in which[12]where the parameters Vm′ and Km′ were referenced
to the inlet concentrations (Cin) and
the parameters Vm and Km were referenced to the intestinal wall concentrations
(Cw) after correcting for the unstirred
aqueous layer permeability.Pharmacokinetic parameters, after
oral dosing of GlySar, were determined
using a noncompartmental approach (NCA, Phoenix WinNonlin v1.3, Certara,
St. Louis, MO).Data were reported as mean ± SE, unless
otherwise noted. Statistical
differences between two groups were determined by an unpaired t test. Multiple group comparisons were performed using
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s
test in which wildtype mice served as the control group (GraphPad
Prism v5.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Identification
of huPEPT1 Mice
Mice
humanized for PEPT1 were generated using a standard
microinjection transgenic strategy with BAC DNA such that the entire hPEPT1 genome, comprising all regulatory and coding regions,
was integrated into the mouse chromosome for inheritance. As shown
in Figure 1, PCR analysis of genomic DNA extracted
from tail biopsies demonstrated that hPEPT1 genomic
DNA only appeared in huPEPT1 (mPept1/hPEPT1) mice and the BAC clone RP11-782G13,
which served as a positive control. In contrast, hPEPT1 genomic DNA was not found in mouse genotypes mPept1 (wildtype), mPept1/hPEPT1 (mPept1 knockout mice bred to hemizygous huPEPT1 animals),
and mPept1 (mPept1 knockout mice not bred to hemizygous huPEPT1 animals). Using wildtype primers, mousePept1 genomic DNA was neither detected in huPEPT1 nor Pept1 knockout mice (i.e., the mPept1/huPEPT1 and mPept1 genotypes). Since mPept1 knockout primers were designed specifically to target
the Neo gene, inserted during homologous recombination
in the Pept1 knockout mouse model,[23] a band was observed in mPept1/hPEPT1, mPept1/huPEPT1, and mPept1mice, but not in mPept1 animals.
Figure 1
Genotyping results for the identification of humanized PEPT1 mice. Genomic DNA was extracted from mouse tail biopsies
and genotyped by PCR using specific primers, as described previously.[23] The DNA ladder, consisting of 100 bp repeats,
was used to determine the size of PCR products. mPept1/hPEPT1 represents the positive screen
for humanized PEPT1 (huPEPT1) mice, mPept1/hPEPT1 the
negative screen for humanized PEPT1 mice, mPept1 the wildtype mice, mPept1 the Pept1 knockout (KO) mice, and RP11–782G13 the purified
BAC DNA (used to inject fertilized eggs in generating huPEPT1), which serves as a positive control.
Genotyping results for the identification of humanized PEPT1mice. Genomic DNA was extracted from mouse tail biopsies
and genotyped by PCR using specific primers, as described previously.[23] The DNA ladder, consisting of 100 bp repeats,
was used to determine the size of PCR products. mPept1/hPEPT1 represents the positive screen
for humanized PEPT1 (huPEPT1) mice, mPept1/hPEPT1 the
negative screen for humanized PEPT1mice, mPept1 the wildtype mice, mPept1 the Pept1 knockout (KO) mice, and RP11–782G13 the purified
BAC DNA (used to inject fertilized eggs in generating huPEPT1), which serves as a positive control.During the process of generating huPEPT1 mice,
six founder mice were identified as containing the RP11-782G13 BAC
DNA for hPEPT1. However, only five of these mice
succeeded in germline transmission of the transgenic gene, and only
three mouse lines showed hPEPT1 transcripts (data
not shown). The mouse line demonstrating the highest level of RNA
was bred and maintained for subsequent studies. Using real-time PCR,[27] the integration copy number of BAC DNA transferred
from the RP11-782G13 clone was estimated as one in our humanized PEPT1mouse genome.
Initial Phenotypic Analysis
Hemizygous huPEPT1 mice appeared normal with no
obvious behavioral abnormality as compared
to wildtype and mPept1 knockout (mPept1) mice. These humanized
mice had normal survival rates, fertility, litter size, gender distribution,
and body weight. Moreover, as shown in Table 2, there were no significant differences in serum clinical chemistry
between the wildtype, Pept1 knockout, and humanized PEPT1mice. Histologic evaluation (i.e., hematoxylin and
eosin staining) established normal morphology of the kidney, small
intestine, and cecum/colon across the three genetic strains (data
not shown).
Table 2
Serum Clinical Chemistry of Wildtype
(WT), Pept1 Knockout (KO), and Humanized PEPT1 (huPEPT1) Micea
WT
Pept1
KO
huPEPT1
Body
Weight
male, 7–8 weeks (g)
21.5 ± 0.6 (12)
21.3 ± 0.6 (12)
22.1 ± 0.5 (12)
female, 7–8 weeks (g)
17.9 ± 0.3 (12)
17.7 ± 0.4 (12)
18.0 ± 0.3 (12)
Serum
sodium (mmol/L)
145 ± 1 (6)
147 ± 1 (6)
146 ± 1 (6)
potassium (mmol/L)
7.3 ± 0.5 (6)
7.4 ± 0.3 (6)
7.7 ± 0.5 (6)
chloride (mmol/L)
113 ± 1 (6)
113 ± 1 (6)
113 ± 1 (6)
calcium (mg/dL)
9.7 ± 0.5 (6)
9.5 ± 0.1 (6)
9.8 ± 0.2 (6)
albumin
(g/dL)
3.4 ± 0.1 (6)
3.5 ± 0.1 (6)
3.6 ± 0.1 (6)
protein (g/dL)
6.4 ± 0.1 (6)
6.4 ± 0.1 (5)
6.3 ± 0.1 (4)
creatinine (mg/dL)
0.24 ± 0.03 (6)
0.25 ± 0.01 (6)
0.28 ± 0.05 (6)
bilirubin (mg/dL)
0.16 ± 0.05 (5)
0.08 ± 0.02 (5)
0.14 ± 0.02 (5)
glucose (mg/dL)
131 ± 22 (5)
163 ± 18 (6)
188 ± 6 (4)
BUN (mg/dL)
29.5 ± 2.4 (6)
27.5 ± 1.5 (6)
33.3 ± 2.1 (6)
ALT (U/L)
95.2 ± 16.0 (6)
78.0 ± 4.8 (6)
101 ± 6 (6)
ALP (U/L)
186 ± 29 (6)
94.2 ± 11.7 (6)
149 ± 15 (6)
AST (U/L)
124 ± 18 (6)
124 ± 16 (6)
104 ± 10 (6)
Data are expressed
as mean ±
SE (n = number of mice). Pept1 KO
(mPept1) and huPEPT1 (mPept1/hPEPT1) mice were not significantly different
than WT (mPept1) mice,
as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses. BUN is urea nitrogen,
ALT is alanine aminotransferase, ALP is alkaline phosphatase, and
AST is aspartate aminotransferase.
Data are expressed
as mean ±
SE (n = number of mice). Pept1 KO
(mPept1) and huPEPT1 (mPept1/hPEPT1) mice were not significantly different
than WT (mPept1) mice,
as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses. BUN is ureanitrogen,
ALT is alanine aminotransferase, ALP is alkaline phosphatase, and
AST is aspartate aminotransferase.
Stable Expression of hPEPT1 in the Intestine of Humanized Mice
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) demonstrated that human (and
not mouse) PEPT1 transcripts were expressed in the
small and large intestines of huPEPT1 mice (Figure 2A), but not in wildtype and Pept1 knockout animals (data not shown). Moreover, mousePept1 transcripts were expressed in wildtype animals but these same transcripts
were not observed in Pept1 knockout mice (Figure 2A). A comparison of Pept1 expression
in proximal colon further demonstrated that hPEPT1 mRNA was detectable in huPEPT1 mice, whereas mPept1 mRNA was not detectable in wildtype animals. Both hPEPT1 and mPept1 transcripts were observed
in the distal colon, respectively, of huPEPT1 and
wildtype mice.
Figure 2
Real time-PCR analyses of mPept1 or hPEPT1 transcripts (A), mPept2 transcripts
(B), mPht1 transcripts (C), and mPht2 transcripts
(D) in the small intestine, colon, and kidney of wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. Gene expression was
normalized by mGapdh. Duo represents the duodenum,
Jej the jejunum, Ile the ileum, PC the proximal colon, DC the distal
colon, and Kid the kidney. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, as evaluated
by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses in which WT was the control group.
Note the discontinuous y-axis in panels B–D
and the different scaling compared to panel A.
Real time-PCR analyses of mPept1 or hPEPT1 transcripts (A), mPept2 transcripts
(B), mPht1 transcripts (C), and mPht2 transcripts
(D) in the small intestine, colon, and kidney of wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. Gene expression was
normalized by mGapdh. Duo represents the duodenum,
Jej the jejunum, Ile the ileum, PC the proximal colon, DC the distal
colon, and Kid the kidney. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, as evaluated
by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses in which WT was the control group.
Note the discontinuous y-axis in panels B–D
and the different scaling compared to panel A.Immunoblot analyses of intestine and kidney were performed
to assess
whether the hPEPT1 transcripts would be translated
into protein. As observed in Figure 3A, high
expression levels of hPEPT1 protein were noted in the duodenum, jejunum,
and ileum of humanized PEPT1mice. In contrast, huPEPT1 animals had low expression of PEPT1 protein in the
proximal and distal colon, and no expression in kidney. Specificity
of the rabbit antihuman PEPT1 antibody was confirmed by the absence
of signal in jejunal samples from wildtype and Pept1 knockout mice (Caco-2 cells served as a positive control). The presence
of mPEPT1 protein was also tested in mice using a specific rabbit
antimouse PEPT1 antibody, as shown in Figure 3B. In agreement with the qPCR results, mousePEPT1 protein was expressed
in the jejunum of wildtype mice, but not in the jejunum of huPEPT1 and mPept1 knockout animals (Caco-2
cells served as a negative control).
Figure 3
Immunoblots of hPEPT1 protein in the small
intestine, large intestine,
and kidney of wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice (A), and mPEPT1 protein in the jejunum of the same genotypes
(B). Protein samples were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto
PVDF membranes, and incubated for 1.5 h with rabbit antihuman hPEPT1[11] (1:3000) or antimouse mPEPT1[12] (1:5000) antiserum, and a mouse monoclonal antibody for
β-actin (1:1000). The membranes were washed three times with
TBST and then incubated for 1 h with an appropriate secondary antibody
of IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:3000). Caco-2 cells
served as positive and negative controls, respectively, for hPEPT1
and mPEPT1. Duo represents the duodenum, Jej the jejunum, Ile the
ileum, PC the proximal colon, DC the distal colon, and Kid the kidney.
Immunoblots of hPEPT1 protein in the small
intestine, large intestine,
and kidney of wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice (A), and mPEPT1 protein in the jejunum of the same genotypes
(B). Protein samples were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto
PVDF membranes, and incubated for 1.5 h with rabbit antihuman hPEPT1[11] (1:3000) or antimouse mPEPT1[12] (1:5000) antiserum, and a mouse monoclonal antibody for
β-actin (1:1000). The membranes were washed three times with
TBST and then incubated for 1 h with an appropriate secondary antibody
of IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:3000). Caco-2 cells
served as positive and negative controls, respectively, for hPEPT1
and mPEPT1. Duo represents the duodenum, Jej the jejunum, Ile the
ileum, PC the proximal colon, DC the distal colon, and Kid the kidney.
Tissue Expression Profile
of Select Transporters and Enzymes
It is crucial to know
whether or not other proton-coupled oligopeptide
transporters (POTs) will be dysregulated as a compensatory response
to the mousePept1 gene being replaced by a humanPEPT1 gene. As shown in Figure 2B–D,
qPCR analyses indicated little to no expression of mousePept2, Pht1, and Pht2 transcripts in
the small and large intestines. There were moderate levels of mPept2 mRNA in kidney; however, no change in expression
was observed between the three genotypes (Figure 2B). In some cases, statistical differences were observed between
the other three POT family members (Figures 2B–D). Nevertheless, given their extremely low expression levels,
it is very unlikely that PEPT2 in the intestines and PHT1/2 in the
intestines and kidney will have meaningful protein expression.The tissue expression of several relevant peptide/mimetic transporters
was also examined by qPCR. As shown in Figure 4, only minor changes were observed in mouse mRNA expression of transporters
between the humanized PEPT1 and mPept1 knockout and wildtype animals. In this regard, mPat1 transcripts increased <2-fold in the small intestine of huPEPT1 (compared to wildtype or knockout mice; Figure 4A), mOat1 transcripts increased
2-fold in the kidney of Pept1 knockout mice (although
no difference was observed between wildtype and huPEPT1 mice; Figure 4C), and mOat2 transcripts increased 2-fold in the kidney of huPEPT1 mice (compared to wildtype or knockout mice; Figure 4C). No differences were noted between the three genotypes
in mouse mRNA expression of mAtb, mOat3, mOct1, mMate1, and mMate2 in the small and large intestines and
kidney.
Figure 4
Real time-PCR analyses of select transporters and enzymes in the
small intestine (A), large intestine (B), and kidney (C) of wildtype
(WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. Refer to Table 1 for gene identification.
Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6).
*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01,
as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses in which WT was the
control group. Note the discontinuous y-axis in panel
A.
Real time-PCR analyses of select transporters and enzymes in the
small intestine (A), large intestine (B), and kidney (C) of wildtype
(WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. Refer to Table 1 for gene identification.
Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6).
*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01,
as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses in which WT was the
control group. Note the discontinuous y-axis in panel
A.The biphenyl hydrolase-like enzyme
BPHL, important in activating
the prodrug valacyclovir to acyclovir, was evaluated in the intestines
and kidney by qPCR. A statistical decrease in mouseBphl transcripts was observed in the small intestine of Pept1 knockout mice (although no difference was observed between wildtype
and huPEPT1 mice; Figure 4A), and a statistical increase in mouseBphl transcripts
was observed in the large intestine of huPEPT1 mice
(compared to wildtype or knockout mice; Figure 4B). It is very unlikely, however, that BPHL will have meaningful
protein expression in the intestines given their extremely low expression
levels. Finally, no difference in mouseBphl transcripts
was observed between genotypes in the kidney (Figure 4C).Primers used in the qPCR analyses can be found in
Table 1.Intestinal perfusion
studies were performed to evaluate the functional
activity of PEPT1 in different regions of the small and large intestines,
and to examine if differences exist between the three genotypes. As
shown in Figure 5, there was substantial permeability
of GlySar in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of huPEPT1 mice, although the permeability was lower than that observed in
wildtype animals. As expected, GlySar permeability was minimal, at
best, in Pept1 knockout mice in all intestinal regions.
In agreement with the qPCR and immunoblot results, GlySar permeability
was low, but measurable, in the colon of huPEPT2 mice
and about 11-fold higher than the colonic permeability observed in
wildtype animals.
Figure 5
Effective permeability of 10 μM [3H]-GlySar
in
different intestinal regions of wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout
(KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. All studies were performed
in pH 6.5 buffer. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6). **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses in which
WT was the control group.
Effective permeability of 10 μM [3H]-GlySar
in
different intestinal regions of wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout
(KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. All studies were performed
in pH 6.5 buffer. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6). **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses in which
WT was the control group.To assess if there were species-dependent differences in
the transport
kinetics of GlySar by PEPT1, concentration-dependent perfusion studies
were performed in the jejunum of wildtype and huPEPT1 mice. As shown in Figure 6A, the maximal
flux (Vm′ = 3.75 ± 0.11 nmol/cm2/sec for wildtype and 0.50 ± 0.04 nmol/cm2/sec for huPEPT1) and Michaelis constant (Km′ = 13.2 ± 1.0 mM for wildtype
and 3.3 ± 0.9 mM for huPEPT1) of GlySar were
substantially lower in mice humanized for the PEPT1 gene. When intestinal wall concentrations were used as the reference,
after adjusting for the unstirred water layer, the maximal flux (Vm = 3.28 ± 0.13 nmol/cm2/sec
for wildtype and 0.49 ± 0.03 nmol/cm2/sec for huPEPT1) and Michaelis constant (Km = 5.5 ± 0.7 mM for wildtype and 2.7 ± 0.6 mM for huPEPT1) were similarly lower in huPEPT1 mice as compared to wildtype animals (Figure 6B). These results demonstrate that a species difference exists in
the transport kinetics of intestinal PEPT1.
Figure 6
Concentration-dependent
flux of [3H]-GlySar (0.01–50
mM total substrate) during jejunal perfusions of wildtype (WT = mPept1) and huPEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. Cin is the inlet concentration of GlySar in perfusate
in which Vm′ = 3.75 ± 0.11
nmol/cm2/sec and Km′
= 13.2 ± 1.0 mM for WT mice, r2 =
0.988; Vm′ = 0.50 ± 0.04 nmol/cm2/sec and Km′ = 3.3 ±
0.9 mM for HU mice, r2 = 0.838 (A). Cw is the estimated concentration of GlySar at
the membrane wall in which Vm = 3.24 ±
0.13 nmol/cm2/sec and Km =
5.5 ± 0.7 mM for WT mice, r2 = 0.993; Vm = 0.49 ± 0.03 nmol/cm2/sec
and Km = 2.7 ± 0.6 mM for HU mice, r2 = 0.973 (B). All studies were performed in
pH 6.5 buffer. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6).
Concentration-dependent
flux of [3H]-GlySar (0.01–50
mM total substrate) during jejunal perfusions of wildtype (WT = mPept1) and huPEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice. Cin is the inlet concentration of GlySar in perfusate
in which Vm′ = 3.75 ± 0.11
nmol/cm2/sec and Km′
= 13.2 ± 1.0 mM for WT mice, r2 =
0.988; Vm′ = 0.50 ± 0.04 nmol/cm2/sec and Km′ = 3.3 ±
0.9 mM for HU mice, r2 = 0.838 (A). Cw is the estimated concentration of GlySar at
the membrane wall in which Vm = 3.24 ±
0.13 nmol/cm2/sec and Km =
5.5 ± 0.7 mM for WT mice, r2 = 0.993; Vm = 0.49 ± 0.03 nmol/cm2/sec
and Km = 2.7 ± 0.6 mM for HU mice, r2 = 0.973 (B). All studies were performed in
pH 6.5 buffer. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 4–6).To assess the in vivo functional activity of hPEPT1 in humanized mice,
the pharmacokinetics of the model
dipeptideGlySar was evaluated after oral dosing. As shown in Figure 7, the plasma concentrations of GlySar were substantially
reduced in Pept1 knockout mice, and according to
Table 3, all pharmacokinetic parameters were
significantly different than wildtype animals. The systemic exposure
(AUC) of GlySar in Pept1 knockout mice was about
50% of that observed in wildtype animals. In contrast, the plasma
concentration–time profiles of GlySar in huPEPT1 mice were virtually superimposable with that observed in wildtype
animals. Humanized PEPT1 and wildtype mice had the
same values for Cmax and Tmax, suggesting that the absorption rate was not different
between the two genotypes. Moreover, the incremental AUC values (i.e.,
AUC0–) in huPEPT1 mice were 93%, 97%, and 104% of that in wildtype mice at 0.5, 2,
and 6 h, respectively, indicating that PEPT1 activity had been fully
restored in these mice.
Figure 7
Plasma concentration–time profiles of
[14C]-GlySar
in wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice following a 5.0 nmol/g oral dose. Data are expressed as mean
± SE (n = 3) in which the y-axis is displayed on a linear scale (A) and on a logarithmic scale
(B).
Table 3
Noncompartmental
Pharmacokinetics
of [14C]GlySar after a 5.0 nmol/g Oral Dose in Wildtype
(WT), Pept1 Knockout (KO), and Humanized PEPT1 (huPEPT1) Micea
parameter (units)
WT
Pept1 KO
huPEPT1
Cmax (μM)
2.71 ± 0.09
1.27 ± 0.05b
2.86 ± 0.09
Tmax (h)
0.33 ± 0.08
1.83 ± 0.17b
0.33 ± 0.08
AUC0–0.5 (μM·h)
1.12 ± 0.02
0.34 ± 0.01b
1.04 ± 0.04
AUC0–2 (μM·h)
4.76 ± 0.12
2.04 ± 0.04b
4.61 ± 0.04
AUC0–6 (μM·h)
11.6 ± 0.6
6.66 ± 0.25b
12.1 ± 0.3
Data are expressed as mean ±
SE (n = 3).
***P < 0.001,
as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses of WT (mPept1), Pept1 KO (mPept1), and huPEPT1 (mPept1/hPEPT1) mice, where WT was the control group.
Plasma concentration–time profiles of
[14C]-GlySar
in wildtype (WT = mPept1), Pept1 knockout (KO = mPept1), and humanized PEPT1 (HU = mPept1/hPEPT1) mice following a 5.0 nmol/g oral dose. Data are expressed as mean
± SE (n = 3) in which the y-axis is displayed on a linear scale (A) and on a logarithmic scale
(B).Data are expressed as mean ±
SE (n = 3).***P < 0.001,
as evaluated by ANOVA/Dunnett’s analyses of WT (mPept1), Pept1 KO (mPept1), and huPEPT1 (mPept1/hPEPT1) mice, where WT was the control group.
Discussion
Substantial progress
has been made in generating and characterizing
mice that contain human CYP450 and conjugation enzymes[19,20] and nuclear receptors.[20,21] However, with the exception
of studies by Schinkel and co-workers[28−30] in which several organic
anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) transporters were humanized
in mice and Scheer et al.[31] in which mice
were humanized for multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2),
no other plasma membrane transporters have been humanized to date.
Thus, the ability to generate a huPEPT1 mouse model
containing the entire human genome offers an unparalleled opportunity
to more reliably study in vivo systems in humanPEPT1
absorption, transport, pharmacologic response, disease, and regulation.In the present study, we developed and characterized a novel mouse
line humanized for PEPT1. In doing so, we made the
following observations: (1) huPEPT1 mice had no obvious
behavioral or pathological phenotype; (2) mRNA and protein profiles
indicated that huPEPT1 mice had substantial PEPT1
expression in all regions of the small intestine (i.e., duodenum,
jejunum, and ileum) along with low but measurable expression in both
proximal and distal segments of the colon; (3) the in situ permeability of GlySar in huPEPT1 mice was similar
to but lower than wildtype animals in small intestine, and greater
than wildtype mice in colon; (4) a species difference existed in the in situ transport kinetics of jejunal PEPT1, in which the
maximal flux and Michaelis constant of GlySar were reduced in huPEPT1 compared to wildtype mice; and (5) the in
vivo function of intestinal PEPT1 appeared fully restored
(compared to Pept1 knockout mice) as indicated by
the nearly identical pharmacokinetics and plasma concentration–time
profiles of GlySar in huPEPT1 and wildtype mice following
a single oral dose.There is good agreement among species (e.g.,
rat, mouse, and human)
regarding the abundant protein expression of PEPT1 in duodenal, jejunal,
and ileal segments of small intestine, and its apical localization.[8−12,32−35] However, the colonic expression
of PEPT1 is controversial and may be the result of differences among
species, antibody specificity, regional specificity, and the methods
of preparation between different laboratories. Whereas some studies
have reported the expression of PEPT1 protein in normal mouse, rat,
and human colon,[9,11,32] other studies have been unable to detect PEPT1 in normal colon.[8,12,33−35] In particular,
Wuensch et al.[11] found a distinct spatial
distribution of colonic PEPT1 in mice, rats, and humans in which immunostaining
was not observed in proximal colon, but significant staining was observed
in the distal colon. In our hands, we have consistently detected abundant
expression of PEPT1 protein in all regions of mouse and rat small
intestine, but not in the colon of rodents past 7 days of age.[8,12] In addition, the functional activity of mousePEPT1 was consistent
with these expression levels, as determined by the permeability of
GlySar,[12] cefadroxil,[36] and valacyclovir[37] in wildtype
compared to Pept1 knockout mice. In the present study, huPEPT1 mice had measurable expression of PEPT1 protein
in the distal and proximal colon (distal > proximal) and 11-fold
higher
permeabilities of GlySar in colon as compared to wildtype mice. Still,
the colonic permeability of GlySar was only about 25–30% of
that in ileum. Therefore, it appears that huPEPT1 mice (under regulatory control of the human genome) could express
a functional PEPT1 protein that transported GlySar across the colon,
whereas wildtype mice (under regulatory control of the murine genome)
did not have this capability.A species-dependent difference
was also reported in the affinity
of PEPT1 for GlySar where the Km values
varied over a 5.4-fold range in yeastPichia pastoris expressing the human (0.86 mM), mouse (0.30 mM), and rat (0.16 mM)
transformants.[16] In the present study,
this trend was reversed in which the Km of GlySar was 2- to 4-fold lower (i.e., greater affinity), and the Vm or Vm′
was 7-fold lower in huPEPT1 mice compared to wildtype
animals during in situ jejunal perfusions of substrate.
It is unclear, at present, why the Km values
of GlySar “flip-flop” when studied in vitro in yeast expressing PEPT1mouse and human homologues compared to in situ during intestinal perfusions in wildtype and huPEPT1 mice. Thus, it will be important to determine, in
subsequent studies, if the in vivo intestinal absorption
of GlySar (and other peptides/mimetics) is dose-dependent (nonlinear)
following oral dose escalation. In doing so, the huPEPT1 mouse model might be useful in clarifying the discrepancy between
the dose-proportional absorption of cefadroxil[6] and valacyclovir[7] in mice over an 8-
to 10-fold oral dose range, respectively, and the nonlinear intestinal
absorption observed for these compounds in humans.[14,15] More important, perhaps, would be the ability of huPEPT1 mice to better predict the oral drug (and prodrug) performance of
new chemical entities.Previous studies have shown that, after
oral dosing, the in vivo systemic exposure of GlySar
in Pept1 knockout mice was only about 50% of that
in wildtype mice even though in situ permeabilities
in the proximal small intestine differed
by >10-fold between genotypes.[12,39] To explain
this “apparent”
discrepancy, the authors suggested that GlySar may be able to take
advantage of the intestine’s residual length and long residence
times so that passive absorption processes play a bigger role in the
absence of PEPT1. Our current study corroborated these earlier findings
where GlySar had a substantially reduced (>50-fold) in
situ permeability in the small intestine of Pept1 knockout
mice but an in vivo oral availability that differed
by only 50%, compared to wildtype animals. Given the complexity of
intestinal absorption (including membrane permeability, luminal drug
concentration, and gastrointestinal residence time), it was not surprising
that the pharmacokinetics and oral absorption profiles of GlySar were
similar in wildtype and huPEPT1 mice (Figure 7 and Table 3), especially
when in situ permeabilities in the small intestine
of huPEPT1 mice were reduced by only 30–40%
and higher in colon (Figure 5). However, since
species differences were observed in the transport kinetics (i.e., Vm and Km) of GlySar,
it will be interesting to see whether or not the pharmacokinetics
are similar in wildtype and huPEPT1 mice when higher
oral doses of substrate are administered and the chance of intestinal
PEPT1 saturability increases.It should be appreciated that
transgenic mice were generated previously[38] in which hPepT1 expression
was regulated by the mouse β-actin or villin promoters as a
model for studying the role of PEPT1 in inflammatory bowel disease.
However, in these mice there was no deletion of endogenous mPEPT1.
As a result, the concomitant protein expression of mouse and humanPEPT1 in the intestines and other PEPT1-expressing tissues of the
body make it impossible to separate the role of each species-specific
transporter and, thereby, humanize the mouse. In our huPEPT1 mouse model, the purified BAC DNA, containing the entire hPEPT1 genome, was injected into eggs from Pept1 knockout mice. As a result, the huPEPT1 mice lacked
endogenous mPEPT1 protein and, by maintaining the mice as hemizygotes,
were able to avoid the potential interference of other endogenous
genes. Another advantage of using genomic DNA was that transcripts
of the huPEPT1 gene were regulated by their own regulatory
elements and produced PEPT1 protein only if the gene translation mechanism
was conserved among mammals.In concluding, the present study
reports, for the first time, the
development and initial characterization of huPEPT1 mice. These mice are unique in that they contain a copy of the entire
human genome in mice previously nulled for mPept1 and demonstrate the full restoration of PEPT1 function. There is
excellent agreement between hPEPT1 expression in the intestines, the in situ intestinal permeability of GlySar, and the in vivo intestinal absorption of GlySar following a single
oral dose. However, a clear species difference was observed in the
maximal flux and affinity of GlySar during in situ jejunal perfusions of huPEPT1 mice as compared
to wildtype animals. These humanized PEPT1mice should
prove a valuable model in future studies investigating the role, relevance,
and regulation of PEPT1 in diet and disease and in the drug discovery
process.
Authors: A Sánchez-Picó; J E Peris-Ribera; C Toledano; F Torres-Molina; V G Casabó; A Martín-Villodre; J M Plá-Delfina Journal: J Pharm Pharmacol Date: 1989-03 Impact factor: 3.765
Authors: Y J Fei; Y Kanai; S Nussberger; V Ganapathy; F H Leibach; M F Romero; S K Singh; W F Boron; M A Hediger Journal: Nature Date: 1994-04-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: D Merlin; M Si-Tahar; S V Sitaraman; K Eastburn; I Williams; X Liu; M A Hediger; J L Madara Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Thomas R Ziegler; Concepción Fernández-Estívariz; Li H Gu; Niloofar Bazargan; Kay Umeakunne; Timothy M Wallace; Emma E Diaz; Kathia E Rosado; Robert R Pascal; John R Galloway; Josiah N Wilcox; Lorraine M Leader Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: S Weller; M R Blum; M Doucette; T Burnette; D M Cederberg; P de Miranda; M L Smiley Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: R Liang; Y J Fei; P D Prasad; S Ramamoorthy; H Han; T L Yang-Feng; M A Hediger; V Ganapathy; F H Leibach Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1995-03-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Xiao-Xing Wang; Yongjun Hu; Richard F Keep; Noriko Toyama-Sorimachi; David E Smith Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Yongjun Hu; Daniel Epling; Jian Shi; Feifeng Song; Yasuhiro Tsume; Hao-Jie Zhu; Gordon L Amidon; David E Smith Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 5.858