Literature DB >> 25148218

Differences between wavefront and subjective refraction for infrared light.

Danielle F W Teel1, Robert J Jacobs, James Copland, Daniel R Neal, Larry N Thibos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of objective wavefront refractions for predicting subjective refractions for monochromatic infrared light.
METHODS: Objective refractions were obtained with a commercial wavefront aberrometer (COAS, Wavefront Sciences). Subjective refractions were obtained for 30 subjects with a speckle optometer validated against objective Zernike wavefront refractions on a physical model eye (Teel et al., Design and validation of an infrared Badal optometer for laser speckle, Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:834-42). Both instruments used near-infrared (NIR) radiation (835 nm for COAS, 820 nm for the speckle optometer) to avoid correction for ocular chromatic aberration. A 3-mm artificial pupil was used to reduce complications attributed to higher-order ocular aberrations. For comparison with paraxial (Seidel) and minimum root-mean-square (Zernike) wavefront refractions, objective refractions were also determined for a battery of 29 image quality metrics by computing the correcting lens that optimizes retinal image quality.
RESULTS: Objective Zernike refractions were more myopic than subjective refractions for 29 of 30 subjects. The population mean discrepancy was -0.26 diopters (D) (SEM = 0.03 D). Paraxial (Seidel) objective refractions tended to be hyperopically biased (mean discrepancy = +0.20 D, SEM = 0.06 D). Refractions based on retinal image quality were myopically biased for 28 of 29 metrics. The mean bias across all 31 measures was -0.24 D (SEM = 0.03). Myopic bias of objective refractions was greater for eyes with brown irises compared with eyes with blue irises.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experimental results are consistent with the hypothesis that reflected NIR light captured by the aberrometer originates from scattering sources located posterior to the entrance apertures of cone photoreceptors, near the retinal pigment epithelium. The larger myopic bias for brown eyes suggests that a greater fraction of NIR light is reflected from choroidal melanin in brown eyes compared with blue eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25148218     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  6 in total

1.  Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Lan Chi Nguyen; Han Cheng; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Photorefraction estimates of refractive power varies with the ethnic origin of human eyes.

Authors:  N Geetha Sravani; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Variant myopia: A new presentation?

Authors:  Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen; Mithra Anand; Viswanathan Sivaraman; Krishna Kumar Ramani; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Predicting subjective refraction with dynamic retinal image quality analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Gil; Carlos S Hernández; Ahhyun Stephanie Nam; Varshini Varadaraj; Nicholas J Durr; Daryl Lim; Shivang R Dave; Eduardo Lage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison of Two Wavefront Autorefractors: Binocular Open-Field versus Monocular Closed-Field.

Authors:  Gonzalo Carracedo; Carlos Carpena-Torres; Laura Batres; Maria Serramito; Anahí Gonzalez-Bergaz
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  New Objective Refraction Metric Based on Sphere Fitting to the Wavefront.

Authors:  Mateusz Jaskulski; Andreí Martínez-Finkelshtein; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.