| Literature DB >> 25147750 |
Varun Kumar1, Abha Mangal1, Sanjeet Panesar1, Geeta Yadav1, Richa Talwar1, Deepak Raut1, Saudan Singh1.
Abstract
Background. Malaria still remains a public health problem in developing countries and changing environmental and climatic factors pose the biggest challenge in fighting against the scourge of malaria. Therefore, the study was designed to forecast malaria cases using climatic factors as predictors in Delhi, India. Methods. The total number of monthly cases of malaria slide positives occurring from January 2006 to December 2013 was taken from the register maintained at the malaria clinic at Rural Health Training Centre (RHTC), Najafgarh, Delhi. Climatic data of monthly mean rainfall, relative humidity, and mean maximum temperature were taken from Regional Meteorological Centre, Delhi. Expert modeler of SPSS ver. 21 was used for analyzing the time series data. Results. Autoregressive integrated moving average, ARIMA (0,1,1) (0,1,0)(12), was the best fit model and it could explain 72.5% variability in the time series data. Rainfall (P value = 0.004) and relative humidity (P value = 0.001) were found to be significant predictors for malaria transmission in the study area. Seasonal adjusted factor (SAF) for malaria cases shows peak during the months of August and September. Conclusion. ARIMA models of time series analysis is a simple and reliable tool for producing reliable forecasts for malaria in Delhi, India.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25147750 PMCID: PMC4132340 DOI: 10.1155/2014/482851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar Res Treat
Monthly malaria cases at RHTC Najafgarh, Delhi, during the study period (n = 92).
| Month | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| March | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| April | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| May | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| June | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| July | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| August | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| September | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| October | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| November | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| December | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||
| Total | 25 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 23 |
Figure 1Monthly malaria cases, rainfall, relative humidity, and mean maximum temperature from January 2006 to December 2013 in the study area.
Seasonal adjustment factor (SAF) for malaria cases.
| Month | Observed cases | SAF |
|---|---|---|
| January | 2 | 0 |
| February | 0 | 0 |
| March | 0 | 0 |
| April | 2 | 0 |
| May | 10 | 0.80 |
| June | 11 | 1.89 |
| July | 17 | 2.41 |
| August | 18 | 3.14 |
| September | 24 | 3.10 |
| October | 7 | 0.66 |
| November | 1 | 0 |
| December | 0 | 0 |
Figure 2Actual (observed) and predicted (fit) values of malaria cases.
Model statistics for malaria data.
| Model parameter | Stationary | Ljung-Box statistic | Model type | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| statistics | df |
| |||
| Monthly malaria infections | 0.725 | 22.899 | 17 | 0.653 | ARIMA (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 0)12 |
Figure 3Observed and forecasted values for malaria cases.