| Literature DB >> 25147427 |
Hirokazu Ohminami1, Kikuko Amo1, Yutaka Taketani1, Kazusa Sato1, Makiko Fukaya1, Takashi Uebanso1, Hidekazu Arai2, Megumi Koganei3, Hajime Sasaki3, Hisami Yamanaka-Okumura1, Hironori Yamamoto1, Eiji Takeda1.
Abstract
A dietary combination of sucrose and linoleic acid strongly contributes to the development of metabolic disorders in Zucker fatty rats. However, the underlying mechanisms of the metabolic disorders are poorly understood. We hypothesized that the metabolic disorders were triggered at a stage earlier than the 8 weeks we had previously reported. In this study, we investigated early molecular events induced by the sucrose and linoleic acid diet in Zucker fatty rats by comparison with other combinations of carbohydrate (sucrose or palatinose) and fat (linoleic acid or oleic acid). Skeletal muscle arachidonic acid levels were significantly increased in the sucrose and linoleic acid group compared to the other dietary groups at 4 weeks, while there were no obvious differences in the metabolic phenotype between the groups. Expression of genes related to arachidonic acid synthesis was induced in skeletal muscle but not in liver and adipose tissue in sucrose and linoleic acid group rats. In addition, the sucrose and linoleic acid group exhibited a rapid induction in endoplasmic reticulum stress and abnormal lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle. We concluded that the dietary combination of sucrose and linoleic acid primarily induces metabolic disorders in skeletal muscle through increases in arachidonic acid and endoplasmic reticulum stress, in advance of systemic metabolic disorders.Entities:
Keywords: ER stress; arachidonic acid; combination diet; insulin sensitivity; lipotoxicity
Year: 2014 PMID: 25147427 PMCID: PMC4078067 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.14-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1Glucose tolerance and whole body insulin sensitivity. OGTT was performed at 3 weeks (A and B) and 4 weeks (C and D). Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured in a blood sample collected at each indicated time after glucose administration (2 g/kg BW). (E) ITT was performed at 4 weeks. Plasma glucose levels at each indicated time were represented as the percent of the value at time 0. Results were means ± SEM (n = 5–6). *p<0.05 vs PL group for SL group, †p<0.05 vs PO group for PL group, and §p<0.05 vs PL group for SO group.
Sequence of oligonucleotide primers for quantitative RT-PCR analysis
| Gene name | Size (bp) | Accession No. | Primer sequence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | Reverse | |||
| ChREBP | 113 | AB074517 | 5'-CAGCTTCTCGACTTGGACTG-3' | 5'-TTGCCAACATAAGCGTCTTC-3' |
| Elovl5 | 150 | NM_134382 | 5'-TTCTTCTGTCAGGGAACACG-3' | 5'-GTGCAGGACTGTGATCTGGT-3' |
| D5D | 178 | NM_053445 | 5'-AAGCACATGCCATACAACCA-3' | 5'-CAGCGGCATGTAAGTGATGA-3' |
| D6D | 144 | NM_031344 | 5'-ACATCATCGTCATGGAAAGC-3' | 5'-CAGAAAGGTGGCCATAATCA-3' |
| ATGL | 148 | NM_001108509 | 5'-GAGATGTGCAAACAGGGCTA-3' | 5'-CAGTCCTCTCCTCAGTCACG-3' |
| DGAT | 150 | NM_053437 | 5'-GACAGCGGTTTCAGCAATTA-3' | 5'-GGGGTCCTTCAGAAACAGAG-3' |
| FATP | 100 | U89529 | 5'-AGGTGACGTGCTAGTGATGG-3' | 5'-CTCCGTGGTGGATACGTTCT-3' |
| GPAT | 116 | NM_017274 | 5'-GTTATCAGAATGCTGCGGAA-3' | 5'-GAGAGGGGAGCAGATACAGG-3' |
| FAT/CD36 | 145 | NM_031561 | 5'-ATGCCGGTTGGAGACCTACT-3' | 5'-CCTCTGGGTTTTGCACGTCA-3' |
| FABP | 174 | NM_024162 | 5'-CATGAAGTCACTCGGTGTGG-3' | 5'-TCATCTGCTGTGACCTCGTC-3' |
| Elovl6 | 99 | NM_134383 | 5'-AGCAAAGCACCCGAACTAGG-3' | 5'-GTACAGGAGCACAGTGATGTGG-3' |
| 5-LOX | 198 | NM_012822 | 5'-CCCATCTGCCTGCTGTATAA-3' | 5'-CAGATGTGTGCGGAGAAGAT-3' |
| 12-LOX | 92 | L06040 | 5'-TCTGGCAGATCATGAATCGG-3' | 5'-GCTCTGCAGTTCATAGTCGT-3' |
| PPARγ | 147 | AF156665 | 5'-TCAAACCCTTTACCACGGTT-3' | 5'-CAGGCTCTACTTTGATCGCA-3' |
| TNF-α | 143 | NM_012675 | 5'-ATGGATCTCAAGACAACCA-3' | 5'-TCCTGGTATGAAATGGCAAA-3' |
| MCP-1 | 93 | M57441 | 5'-CCCTAAGGACTTCAGCACCTTTG-3' | 5'-AAGTGCTTGAGGTGGTTGTGG-3' |
| Acrp30 | 140 | NM_144744 | 5'-GGAAACTTGTGCAAGGTTGGA-3' | 5'-GGTCACCCTTAGGACCAAGA-3' |
| Bip | 279 | NM_013083 | 5'-CCTGTTGCTGGACTCTGTGA-3' | 5'-AGGAGTGAAGGCCACATACG-3' |
| Chop | 231 | NM_001109986 | 5'-TTGGGGGCACCTATATCTCA-3' | 5'-CGCACTGACCACTCTGTTTC-3' |
| Xbp1 | 229 | NM_001004210 | 5'-GAGCAGCAAGTGGTGGATTT-3' | 5'-GAGGCGCACGTAGTCTGAGT-3' |
| Atf3 | 225 | NM_012912 | 5'-CCAGGTCTCTGCCTCAGAAG-3' | 5'-GCCACCTCAGACTTGGTGA-3' |
| Atf6 | 249 | NM_001107196 | 5'-AGCAGAGCCACTGAAGGAAG-3' | 5'-GGGGTCCTTCAGAAACAGAG-3' |
| LPCAT3 | 188 | NM_001012189 | 5'-GATGGCCTACCTTCTTGCTG-3' | 5'-ATGAGGGGACACCCAGTATG-3' |
| LPIAT1 | 177 | NM_001134978 | 5'-ATTGCAGCTTCCCTGGAGTA-3' | 5'-GGCACTCCTCAAAACGTAGG-3' |
| SERCA1 | 170 | NM_058213 | 5'-AAAGGAAGGAGCCCAGGTTA-3' | 5'-GCTCACCCCAAAATAGGACA-3' |
| SERCA2a | 228 | NM_001110823 | 5'-TATTGGCTGGTGAAGGAGGT-3' | 5'-GACAATGTCTGCTGGCTCAA-3' |
| SERCA2b | 176 | NM_001110139 | 5'-CCGCTTCCTAAACATTGCAG-3' | 5'-CAACAGCTAAAACCCCACTTG-3' |
Body weight, plasma concentrations, and hepatic lipid content of Zucker fatty rats fed each diet for 4 weeks
| PO | PL | SO | SL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 607.21 ± 11.21 | 600.76 ± 17.36 | 624.62 ± 13.25 | 621.15 ± 11.40 |
| Visceral fat (g/kg BW) | 137.34 ± 4.54 | 135.15 ± 6.63 | 142.92 ± 3.72 | 142.62 ± 3.61 |
| Mesenteric fat | 37.13 ± 1.42 | 37.35 ± 2.15 | 41.10 ± 1.48 | 39.49 ± 1.85 |
| Epididymal fat | 38.41 ± 1.89 | 36.93 ± 2.47 | 42.38 ± 2.36 | 40.74 ± 1.60 |
| Retroperitoneal fat | 61.80 ± 5.38 | 60.87 ± 3.33 | 59.44 ± 1.34 | 62.44 ± 1.60 |
| Plasma concentrations | ||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 7.68 ± 0.15 | 6.55 ± 0.46 | 7.04 ± 0.31 | 8.07 ± 1.07 |
| Insulin (nmol/L) | 1.91 ± 0.21 | 1.62 ± 0.25 | 1.31 ± 0.09 | 2.13 ± 0.43 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 147 ± 14 | 166 ± 23 | 215 ± 37 | 150 ± 18 |
| T-Chol (mg/dL) | 162 ± 14 | 159 ± 15 | 226 ± 24* | 171 ± 17 |
| NEFA (mEq/L) | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 0.74 ± 0.05 |
| Adiponectin (µg/mL) | 10.18 ± 3.83 | 9.25 ± 3.19 | 13.56 ± 2.18 | 13.57 ± 3.81 |
| Leptin (pg/mL) | 127.4 ± 23.5 | 93.6 ± 21.1 | 131.0 ± 14.4 | 129.0 ± 10.5 |
| Hepatic TG (mg/g tissue) | 107 ± 5.0 | 128 ± 18 | 121 ± 15 | 128 ± 18 |
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p<0.05 vs PO, PL, SL groups for SO group.
Fig. 2In vivo glucose uptake in peripheral tissues at 4 weeks. Insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake in gastrocnemius (A), soleus (B), epididymal adipose tissue (eWAT) (C), and liver (D) were determined by non-radioisotopic assay. Results were means ± SEM (n = 4–6). *p<0.05.
Fig. 3Akt phosphorylation in peripheral tissues at 4 weeks. Protein samples extracted from gastrocnemius (A), soleus (B), eWAT (C), and liver (D) under insulin stimulation were subjected to immunoblotting for p-Akt (Ser473) and Akt, as indicated. Intensity of the signals was quantified using software (Malti Gauge ver. 3.0). Results were means ± SEM (n = 5–6) and calculated as relative expression levels to the PO group. *p<0.05.
Fig. 4Fatty acid composition in peripheral tissues at 4 weeks. Fatty acid composition of whole lipid extracted from soleus muscle (A), liver (B), and eWAT (C) were determined by gas-liquid chromatography. Results were means ± SEM (n = 5–6) and represented as a percentage of total fatty acid content. *p<0.05. Significant dietary effects of carbohydrate and fat (p<0.05) by 2-way ANOVA were described as C (palatinose vs sucrose) and F (oleic acid vs linoleic acid).
Fig. 5Tissue-specific changes in glucose and lipid metabolism at 4 weeks. mRNA expression in soleus muscle (A), liver (B), and epididymal adipose tissue (eWAT) (C) was determined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. (D and E) Protein samples extracted from soleus muscle were subjected to immunoblotting for SREBP-1c (D), p-AMPKα (Thr172) and total AMPKα, as indicated. Results were means ± SEM (n = 5–6) and calculated as relative expression levels to the PO group. *p<0.05.
Fig. 6ER stress response in soleus muscle at 4 weeks. (A) mRNA expression of genes related to ER stress and phospholipid remodeling in soleus muscle was determined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. (B) Protein samples extracted from soleus muscle were subjected to immunoblotting for p-JNK (Thr183/185) and total JNK, as indicated. Results were means ± SEM (n = 5–6) and calculated as relative expression levels to the PO group. *p<0.05.