Literature DB >> 25147126

Biosecurity on Finnish cattle, pig and sheep farms - results from a questionnaire.

Leena Sahlström1, Terhi Virtanen2, Jonna Kyyrö2, Tapani Lyytikäinen2.   

Abstract

Biosecurity is important in order to prevent disease transmission between animals on farms as well as from farm to farm. Personal biosecurity routines such as hand washing and the use of protective clothing and footwear are measures that should be used at all farms. Other measures are for example related to purchasing new animals to the farm. A questionnaire-based survey was undertaken to study the frequency of use of different biosecurity measures on cattle, pig and sheep farms in Finland. Information about which biosecurity measures are in use is needed for contingency planning of emerging diseases or when combating endemic diseases. Knowledge about the level of biosecurity of a farm is also needed in order to assess if and where improvement is needed. Information regarding biosecurity levels may benefit future animal disease risk assessments. A total of 2242 farmers responded to the questionnaire resulting in a response rate of 45%. The implementation frequencies of different biosecurity measures are reported. The results revealed differences between species: large pig farms had a better biosecurity level than small cattle farms. There were also differences between production types such as dairy farming versus beef cattle farming, but these were not as remarkable. Sheep farming in Finland is sparse and the large number of hobby farmers keeps the biosecurity level low on sheep farms. This might represent a risk for the entire sheep farming industry. The Finnish farmers were satisfied with their on-farm biosecurity. Eighty percent of the farmers report that they were satisfied even though the biosecurity level was not particularly high. The implementation of biosecurity measures could be further improved. Even though the disease situation in Finland is good today, one must be prepared for possible epidemics of threatening diseases.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosecurity; Cattle; GLM; Pig; Questionnaire; Sheep

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25147126     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  14 in total

1.  A survey of biosecurity measures and serological status for bovine viral diarrhoea virus and bovine herpesvirus 1 on dairy cattle farms in north-west and north-east Spain.

Authors:  Francisco J Villaamil; Ignacio Arnaiz; Alberto Allepuz; Miquel Molins; Mercedes Lazaro; Bibiana Benavides; Sebastián J Moya; Jordi Casal Fabrega; Eduardo Yus; Francisco J Dieguez
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2020-09-16

2.  Biosecurity level and health management practices in 60 Swedish farrow-to-finish herds.

Authors:  Annette Backhans; Marie Sjölund; Ann Lindberg; Ulf Emanuelson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  A Comparative Assessment of the Risks of Introduction and Spread of Foot-and-Mouth Disease among Different Pig Sectors in Australia.

Authors:  Marta Hernández-Jover; Nicole Schembri; Patricia K Holyoake; Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio; Peter Anthony Julian Martin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-09-22

4.  Exploring Attitudes and Beliefs towards Implementing Cattle Disease Prevention and Control Measures: A Qualitative Study with Dairy Farmers in Great Britain.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Nick Wright; Wendela Wapenaar; Susanne Jarratt; Pru Hobson-West; Imogen F Richens; Jasmeet Kaler; Heather Buchanan; Jonathan N Huxley; Heather M O'Connor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Differing perceptions - Swedish farmers' views of infectious disease control.

Authors:  Jenny Frössling; Maria Nöremark
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-11

6.  Sanitary program to reduce embryonic mortality associated with infectious diseases in cattle.

Authors:  Amauri Alcindo Alfieri; Raquel Arruda Leme; Alais Maria Dall Agnol; Alice Fernandes Alfieri
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.807

7.  Adoption of Secure Pork Supply Plan Biosecurity by U.S. Swine Producers.

Authors:  Christopher C Pudenz; Lee L Schulz; Glynn T Tonsor
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-05-28

8.  Dairy farmers' decision-making to implement biosecurity measures: A study of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Sebastián Moya; Francisco Tirado; Josep Espluga; Giovanna Ciaravino; Ramon Armengol; Javier Diéguez; Eduardo Yus; Bibiana Benavides; Jordi Casal; Alberto Allepuz
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.005

9.  Biosecurity practices in western Canadian cow-calf herds and their association with animal health.

Authors:  Trent R Wennekamp; Cheryl L Waldner; Sarah Parker; M Claire Windeyer; Kathy Larson; John R Campbell
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.008

10.  Swedish Farmers' Opinions about Biosecurity and Their Intention to Make Professionals Use Clean Protective Clothing When Entering the Stable.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin; Linda Ernholm; Jenny Frössling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.