Literature DB >> 25147037

Predictors of recurrent events in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale within the CLOSURE I (Evaluation of the STARFlex Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke and/or Transient Ischemic Attack Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a Patent Foramen Ovale) trial.

Sammy Elmariah1, Anthony J Furlan2, Mark Reisman3, David Burke4, Moshe Vardi4, Neil J Wimmer5, Shuqiong Ling4, Xiaohua Chen4, David M Kent6, Joseph Massaro7, Laura Mauri8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify predictors of recurrent ischemic neurologic events within the CLOSURE I (Evaluation of the STARFlex Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke and/or Transient Ischemic Attack Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a Patent Foramen Ovale) trial.
BACKGROUND: The CLOSURE I trial found that transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure using the STARFlex device was not superior to medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and PFO.
METHODS: The CLOSURE I trial is a multicenter, randomized trial of transcatheter PFO closure compared with medical therapy in patients who presented with cryptogenic stroke or TIA and had a PFO. We identified clinical predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA during 2 years of follow-up using Cox proportional hazards regression within the pooled intention-to-treat cohort.
RESULTS: In 909 patients, the incidence of recurrent events was 5.7% with 25 patients suffering a recurrent stroke and 30 a TIA. Patients who had a recurrent event had higher body mass index (30.2 ± 6.2 vs. 28.3 ± 5.8%; p = 0.03) and more frequently had diabetes (19.2% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.0016), hypertension (46.2% vs. 30.1%; p = 0.015), and ischemic heart disease (3.8% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.05). Diabetes (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69 to 6.84; p = 0.0007), index TIA (HR vs. stroke: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.20 to 3.80; p = 0.01), and the detection of atrial fibrillation after study enrollment (HR: 4.85; 95% CI: 2.05 to 11.47; p = 0.0003) independently predicted recurrent ischemic neurologic events. Recurrent neurologic events were more frequent in subjects with RoPE (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) score ≤5 than those with >5 (14.5% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest an alternative etiology to paradoxical embolism was frequently responsible for recurrent events within the CLOSURE I trial. (Evaluation of the STARFlex Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke or TIA Due to the Possible Passage of a Clot of Unknown Origin Through a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) [CLOSURE I]; NCT00201461).
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patent foramen ovale; risk factor; stroke; transient ischemic attack

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25147037     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  16 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wessler; David M Kent
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  Role of occlusive devices to prevent thromboembolism among persons with a patent foramen ovale and prior stroke.

Authors:  Christopher Roth; Oluseun Alli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  [Risk factors for recurrence of large atherosclerotic cerebral infarction].

Authors:  Ying-Yi Dai; Zhi-Xin Huang; Xin-Tong Liu; Qi-Zhang Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 4.  Patent foramen ovale (PFO), stroke and pregnancy.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Wenjun Deng; Igor Palacios; Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje; David McMullin; Dong Zhou; Eng H Lo; Ferdinando Buonanno; MingMing Ning
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Serpentine thrombus in the heart: a rare case of trapped thrombus in patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Dominika M Zoltowska; Yashwant Agrawal; Jagadeesh K Kalavakunta
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-21

6.  Residual Shunt After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Long-Term Stroke Recurrence.

Authors:  Wenjun Deng; Shanye Yin; David McMullin; Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje; Sammy Elmariah; Judy Hung; Eng H Lo; Igor F Palacios; Ferdinando S Buonanno; MingMing Ning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Right-to-left shunts in unexplained syncope: an age- and sex-matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dong Liu; Keyan Chen; Jie Gong; Lin Huang; Xin Dong; Qi Wan; Xiaoxuan Qin; Jiaojiao Shi; Lihong Zhang; Zhaolu Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

8.  Rheumatoid arthritis significantly increased recurrence risk after ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Yih-Ru Chen; Fang-I Hsieh; Li-Ming Lien; Chaur-Jong Hu; Jiann-Shing Jeng; Giia-Sheun Peng; Sung-Chun Tang; Nai-Fang Chi; Yueh-Feng Sung; Hung-Yi Chiou
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Prediction of early-onset atrial tachyarrhythmia after successful trans-catheter device closure of atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Kyoung-Min Park; Jin Kyung Hwang; Kwang Jin Chun; Seung-Jung Park; Young Keun On; June Soo Kim; Seung Woo Park; I-Seok Kang; Jinyoung Song; June Huh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Ivan Milev; Planinka Zafirovska; Zan Zimbakov; Shpend Idrizi; Vilma Ampova-Sokolov; Emilija Gorgieva; Liljana Ilievska; Goce Tosheski; Nikola Hristov; Ljubica Georgievska-Ismail; Tanja Anguseva; Zan Mitrev
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.