Literature DB >> 25147020

Lack of body positional effects on paresthesias when stimulating the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in the treatment of chronic pain.

Jeffery Kramer1, Liong Liem, Marc Russo, Iris Smet, Jean-Pierre Van Buyten, Frank Huygen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: One prominent side effect from neurostimulation techniques, and in particular spinal cord stimulation (SCS), is the change in intensity of stimulation when moving from an upright (vertical) to a recumbent or supine (horizontal) position and vice versa. It is well understood that the effects of gravity combined with highly conductive cerebrospinal fluid provide the mechanism by which changes in body position can alter the intensity of stimulation-induced paresthesias. While these effects are well established for leads that are placed within the more medial aspects of the spinal canal, little is known about these potential effects in leads placed in the lateral epidural space and in particular within the neural foramina near the dorsal root ganglion (DRG).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively validated a newly developed paresthesia intensity rating scale and compared perceived paresthesia intensities when subjects assumed upright vs. supine bodily positions during neuromodulation of the DRG.
RESULTS: On average, the correlation coefficient between stimulation intensity (pulse amplitude) and perceived paresthesia intensity was 0.83, demonstrating a strong linear relationship. No significant differences in paresthesia intensities were reported within subjects when moving from an upright (4.5 ± 0.14) to supine position 4.5 (± 0.12) (p > 0.05). This effect persisted through 12 months following implant.
CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation of the DRG produces paresthesias that remain consistent across body positions, suggesting that this paradigm may be less susceptible to positional effects than dorsal column stimulation.
© 2014 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; dorsal root ganglion (DRG); neuromodulation; position; spinal cord stimulation (SCS)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25147020     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  11 in total

1.  Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for chronic pain modulates Aβ-fiber activity but not C-fiber activity: A computational modeling study.

Authors:  Robert D Graham; Tim M Bruns; Bo Duan; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Jacob Caylor; Rajiv Reddy; Sopyda Yin; Christina Cui; Mingxiong Huang; Charles Huang; Rao Ramesh; Dewleen G Baker; Alan Simmons; Dmitri Souza; Samer Narouze; Ricardo Vallejo; Imanuel Lerman
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2019-06-28

3.  Stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion using an Injectrode®.

Authors:  Ashley N Dalrymple; Jordyn E Ting; Rohit Bose; James K Trevathan; Stephan Nieuwoudt; Scott F Lempka; Manfred Franke; Kip A Ludwig; Andrew J Shoffstall; Lee E Fisher; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Dorsal root ganglion stimulation of injured sensory neurons in rats rapidly eliminates their spontaneous activity and relieves spontaneous pain.

Authors:  Dongman Chao; Christina M Mecca; Guoliang Yu; Ian Segel; Michael S Gold; Quinn H Hogan; Bin Pan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Unique Characteristics of the Dorsal Root Ganglion as a Target for Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Michael F Esposito; Rudy Malayil; Michael Hanes; Timothy Deer
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Experimental Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Burst vs. Conventional Stimulation Paradigm.

Authors:  Glenn Franken; Jacques Debets; Elbert A J Joosten
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2018-12-20

7.  Nonlinear Relation Between Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Amplitude and Behavioral Outcome in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

Authors:  Glenn Franken; Jacques Debets; Elbert A J Joosten
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-11-18

8.  Analgesic dorsal root ganglionic field stimulation blocks conduction of afferent impulse trains selectively in nociceptive sensory afferents.

Authors:  Dongman Chao; Zhiyong Zhang; Christina M Mecca; Quinn H Hogan; Bin Pan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.926

9.  Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Robert M Levy; Jeffery Kramer; Lawrence Poree; Kasra Amirdelfan; Eric Grigsby; Peter Staats; Allen W Burton; Abram H Burgher; Jon Obray; James Scowcroft; Stan Golovac; Leonardo Kapural; Richard Paicius; Christopher Kim; Jason Pope; Thomas Yearwood; Sam Samuel; W Porter McRoberts; Hazmer Cassim; Mark Netherton; Nathan Miller; Michael Schaufele; Edward Tavel; Timothy Davis; Kristina Davis; Linda Johnson; Nagy Mekhail
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).

Authors:  Philippe Rigoard; Manuel Roulaud; Lisa Goudman; Nihel Adjali; Amine Ounajim; Jimmy Voirin; Christophe Perruchoud; Bénédicte Bouche; Philippe Page; Rémy Guillevin; Mathieu Naudin; Martin Simoneau; Bertille Lorgeoux; Sandrine Baron; Kevin Nivole; Mathilde Many; Iona Maitre; Raphaël Rigoard; Romain David; Maarten Moens; Maxime Billot
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.