Literature DB >> 25146970

Competence for chemical reprogramming of sexual fate correlates with an intersexual molecular signature in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Elena P Sorokin1, Audrey P Gasch2, Judith Kimble3.   

Abstract

In multicellular organisms, genetic programs guide cells to adopt cell fates as tissues are formed during development, maintained in adults, and repaired after injury. Here we explore how a small molecule in the environment can switch a genetic program from one fate to another. Wild-type Caenorhabditis elegans XX adult hermaphrodites make oocytes continuously, but certain mutant XX adults make sperm instead in an otherwise hermaphrodite soma. Thus, puf-8; lip-1 XX adults make only sperm, but they can be switched from sperm to oocyte production by treatment with a small-molecule MEK inhibitor. To ask whether this chemical reprogramming is common, we tested six XX sperm-only mutants, but found only one other capable of cell fate switching, fbf-1; lip-1. Therefore, reprogramming competence relies on genotype, with only certain mutants capable of responding to the MEK inhibitor with a cell fate change. To gain insight into the molecular basis of competence for chemical reprogramming, we compared polyadenylated transcriptomes of competent and noncompetent XX sperm-only mutants in the absence of the MEK inhibitor and hence in the absence of cell fate reprogramming. Despite their cellular production of sperm, competent mutants were enriched for oogenic messenger RNAs relative to mutants lacking competence for chemical reprogramming. In addition, competent mutants expressed the oocyte-specific protein RME-2, whereas those lacking competence did not. Therefore, mutants competent for reprogramming possess an intersexual molecular profile at both RNA and protein levels. We suggest that this intersexual molecular signature is diagnostic of an intermediate network state that poises the germline tissue for changing its cellular fate in response to environmental cues.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MAPK signaling; PUF protein; germline; network states; sex determination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25146970      PMCID: PMC4196613          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.169409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  69 in total

Review 1.  Wound healing: a paradigm for regeneration.

Authors:  Victor W Wong; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Small molecules facilitate the reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts into pancreatic lineages.

Authors:  Ke Li; Saiyong Zhu; Holger A Russ; Shaohua Xu; Tao Xu; Yu Zhang; Tianhua Ma; Matthias Hebrok; Sheng Ding
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  Phases of reprogramming.

Authors:  Laurent David; Jose M Polo
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.020

4.  Dose-dependent control of proliferation and sperm specification by FOG-1/CPEB.

Authors:  Beth E Thompson; David S Bernstein; Jennifer L Bachorik; Andrei G Petcherski; Marvin Wickens; Judith Kimble
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  FBF-1 and FBF-2 regulate the size of the mitotic region in the C. elegans germline.

Authors:  Liana B Lamont; Sarah L Crittenden; David Bernstein; Marvin Wickens; Judith Kimble
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line.

Authors:  B Zhang; M Gallegos; A Puoti; E Durkin; S Fields; J Kimble; M P Wickens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  TRA-1 ChIP-seq reveals regulators of sexual differentiation and multilevel feedback in nematode sex determination.

Authors:  Matt Berkseth; Kohta Ikegami; Swathi Arur; Jason D Lieb; David Zarkower
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A new dataset of spermatogenic vs. oogenic transcriptomes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Marco A Ortiz; Daniel Noble; Elena P Sorokin; Judith Kimble
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Tissue-specific direct targets of Caenorhabditis elegans Rb/E2F dictate distinct somatic and germline programs.

Authors:  Michelle Kudron; Wei Niu; Zhi Lu; Guilin Wang; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder; Valerie Reinke
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Sex Determination in Nematode Germ Cells.

Authors:  Ronald E Ellis
Journal:  Sex Dev       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 1.943

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.