P Leavy1, A Templeton2, L Young3, C McDonnell4. 1. Dental Officer and Scottish Dental Postgraduate Remote and Rural Fellow, Abban Street Dental Clinic, 22A Abban Street, Inverness, IV3 8HH. 2. Research Fellow, Translation Research in a Dental Setting (TRiaDS), Dundee Dental Education Centre, Frankland Building, Smalls Wynd, Dundee, DD1 4HN. 3. Research and Development Manager, Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme (SDCEP), Dundee Dental Education Centre, Frankland Building, Smalls Wynd, Dundee, DD1 4HN. 4. Consultant Occupational Health Physician, HSE Mid-Western Regional Hospital, Dooradoyle, County Limerick, Ireland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate experience, practice and beliefs regarding occupational exposures to blood and oral fluids among a random sample of 300 dentists working in Scotland's NHS primary dental services. METHOD: A cross-sectional postal survey assessed occupational exposure policies and procedures, recent occupational exposure incidence and current management. Beliefs were measured using constructs from the theory of planned behaviour, shown to influence behaviour in this population. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of dentists responded. Fourteen percent had sustained an occupational exposure in the previous 12 months; of those, 35% did not report their exposure. All respondents' practices had protocols in place for managing and reporting dental team member sharps injuries. Most (82%) had protocols for mucocutaneous exposures. Less than half (48%) had a protocol for managing and reporting patient exposures to blood or saliva. Dentists placed significantly more importance (z-score -4.44, p value <0.001) and necessity (z-score -4.17, p value <0.001) on reporting patient exposure than dentist occupational exposure. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that while dentists generally have positive beliefs about reporting occupational exposures, there are gaps in practice.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate experience, practice and beliefs regarding occupational exposures to blood and oral fluids among a random sample of 300 dentists working in Scotland's NHS primary dental services. METHOD: A cross-sectional postal survey assessed occupational exposure policies and procedures, recent occupational exposure incidence and current management. Beliefs were measured using constructs from the theory of planned behaviour, shown to influence behaviour in this population. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of dentists responded. Fourteen percent had sustained an occupational exposure in the previous 12 months; of those, 35% did not report their exposure. All respondents' practices had protocols in place for managing and reporting dental team member sharps injuries. Most (82%) had protocols for mucocutaneous exposures. Less than half (48%) had a protocol for managing and reporting patient exposures to blood or saliva. Dentists placed significantly more importance (z-score -4.44, p value <0.001) and necessity (z-score -4.17, p value <0.001) on reporting patient exposure than dentist occupational exposure. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that while dentists generally have positive beliefs about reporting occupational exposures, there are gaps in practice.