Literature DB >> 25146811

Update on guidelines for selecting appropriate patients to receive treatment with dental implants: priorities for the NHS--the position after 15 years.

A Alani1, K Bishop2, T Renton3, S Djemal4.   

Abstract

In 1997 the Faculty of Dental Surgery (Royal College of Surgeons, England) as part of a wider publication produced guidance on prioritisation for the selection of patients to receive treatment with dental implants within the NHS in the UK (http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/fds/publications-clinical-guidelines/clinical_guidelines/index.html). This update considers eight main groups who may benefit from treatment with osseointegrated implants. Where patients are being considered for implant-based rehabilitation, treatment plans must be weighed up against the risks, benefits and outcomes outlined in evidence-based research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25146811     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  2 in total

1.  Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.

Authors:  Manal A Awad; James P Lund; Stanley H Shapiro; David Locker; Esa Klemetti; Antoine Chehade; Andre Savard; Jocelyne S Feine
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients--the York Consensus Statement.

Authors:  J Mark Thomason; Jocelyne Feine; Catherine Exley; Paula Moynihan; Frauke Müller; Ignace Naert; Janice S Ellis; Craig Barclay; Chris Butterworth; Brendan Scott; Christopher Lynch; Dominic Stewardson; Philip Smith; Richard Welfare; Paul Hyde; Robert McAndrew; Michael Fenlon; Stewart Barclay; Dean Barker
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 1.626

  2 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Restorative dentistry for the older patient cohort.

Authors:  R Y Jablonski; M W Barber
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  The denture box. An aid to denture hygiene.

Authors:  M J Faigenblum
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Should implants be considered for patients with periodontal disease?

Authors:  E King; R Patel; A Patel; L Addy
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Attitudes of general dental practitioners to the maintenance of Locator retained implant overdentures.

Authors:  J W Vere; S Eliyas; P F Wragg
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Improving patient safety in a UK dental hospital: long-term use of clinical audit.

Authors:  M P Ashley; M N Pemberton; A Saksena; A Shaw; S Dickson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Transdisciplinary treatment of Class III malocclusion using conventional implant-supported anchorage: 10-year posttreatment follow-up.

Authors:  Mariana Roennau Lemos Rinaldi; Susana Maria Deon Rizzatto; Luciane Macedo de Menezes; Waldemar Daudt Polido; Eduardo Martinelli Santayanna de Lima
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

7.  Peri-implantitis and the prosthodontist.

Authors:  A Dawood; B Marti Marti; S Tanner
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Income or education, which has a stronger association with dental implant use in elderly people in Japan?

Authors:  Hazem Abbas; Jun Aida; Masashige Saito; Georgios Tsakos; Richard G Watt; Shigeto Koyama; Katsunori Kondo; Ken Osaka
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.607

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.