INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the pulpal and periapical responses of dogs' teeth after pulpotomy and pulp capping with a new tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine) when compared with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) by radiographic, histopathologic, and histomicrobiological analyses. METHODS: Sixty roots (30 teeth) of dogs were divided into 2 groups, Biodentine (n = 36 roots) and ProRoot MTA (control, n = 24 roots). Animals were killed after 120 days, and the teeth were subjected to histotechnical processing (hematoxylin-eosin and Brown and Brenn staining). Qualitative and quantitative histopathologic data were analyzed by Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Radiographically, mineralized tissue bridge formation was observed in more specimens treated with Biodentine (96.8%) than with MTA (72.2%) (P = .02). Integrity of the lamina dura and absence of periapical bone rarefaction and root resorption (external and internal) were observed in all specimens. Histopathologic and histomicrobiological analyses revealed mineralized tissue bridge formation, pulpal vitality, odontoblast layer integrity, preserved periodontal ligament, and absence of bone or root resorption and microorganisms in both groups. Although the bridges formed at the amputation site had similar morphology, they were significantly thicker in the Biodentine group (P < .0001). Comparison between the radiographic and histopathologic results showed that radiographic visualization of more bridges in the Biodentine group was related to bridge thickness because radiographic diagnosis was flawed for bridges with thickness less than 0.5 mm. Fluorescence microscopy improved the visualization of bridge structure. CONCLUSIONS: Biodentine presented tissue compatibility and allowed for mineralized tissue bridge formation after pulpotomy in all specimens with similar morphology and integrity to those formed with use of MTA. Periapical radiographs failed in detecting mineralized tissue bridges with thickness less than 0.5 mm.
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the pulpal and periapical responses of dogs' teeth after pulpotomy and pulp capping with a new tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine) when compared with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) by radiographic, histopathologic, and histomicrobiological analyses. METHODS: Sixty roots (30 teeth) of dogs were divided into 2 groups, Biodentine (n = 36 roots) and ProRoot MTA (control, n = 24 roots). Animals were killed after 120 days, and the teeth were subjected to histotechnical processing (hematoxylin-eosin and Brown and Brenn staining). Qualitative and quantitative histopathologic data were analyzed by Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Radiographically, mineralized tissue bridge formation was observed in more specimens treated with Biodentine (96.8%) than with MTA (72.2%) (P = .02). Integrity of the lamina dura and absence of periapical bone rarefaction and root resorption (external and internal) were observed in all specimens. Histopathologic and histomicrobiological analyses revealed mineralized tissue bridge formation, pulpal vitality, odontoblast layer integrity, preserved periodontal ligament, and absence of bone or root resorption and microorganisms in both groups. Although the bridges formed at the amputation site had similar morphology, they were significantly thicker in the Biodentine group (P < .0001). Comparison between the radiographic and histopathologic results showed that radiographic visualization of more bridges in the Biodentine group was related to bridge thickness because radiographic diagnosis was flawed for bridges with thickness less than 0.5 mm. Fluorescence microscopy improved the visualization of bridge structure. CONCLUSIONS:Biodentine presented tissue compatibility and allowed for mineralized tissue bridge formation after pulpotomy in all specimens with similar morphology and integrity to those formed with use of MTA. Periapical radiographs failed in detecting mineralized tissue bridges with thickness less than 0.5 mm.
Authors: C Cuadros-Fernández; A I Lorente Rodríguez; S Sáez-Martínez; J García-Binimelis; I About; M Mercadé Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 3.573